Costly signals can facilitate cooperation and punishment in the prisoner?s dilemma

被引:0
|
作者
Guan, Kaixuan [1 ]
Chen, Yuyou [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zheng, Wanjun [2 ]
Zeng, Lulu [2 ]
Ye, Hang [2 ]
机构
[1] Ind & Commercial Bank China, Postdoctoral Res Ctr, Beijing 100140, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Ctr Econ Behav & Decis Making CEBD, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
关键词
Cooperation; Punishment; Evolutionary game theory; Costly signaling theory; The prisoner?s dilemma; SOCIAL ATTRACTIVENESS; EVOLUTION; RECIPROCITY; SELECTION; EMERGENCE; PROMOTES; FREEDOM;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2022.127997
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Costly signal is regarded as one of the mechanisms to explain the emergence of cooperation. Both the cost of cooperation and the cost of punishment can be seen as expensive cost signals. Previous research has used costly signaling theory to explain the establishment of cooperation and punishment in public goods game. However, punishment is less likely to emerge stably in the prisoner's dilemma, and the punisher cannot have additional information to identify and punish the defector. Therefore, it is particularly important to further study whether the expensive cost signal in the prisoner's dilemma can promote the emergence of cooperation and punishment. We distinguish between costly punishing signals and costly cooperative signals in this paper to look at the rule that turns payoff into fitness. The findings reveal that, without punishment, if the costly signal is weak and the cost of cooperation is not too high compared to the benefit of cooperation, cooperation is a better choice than defection. With punishment, if there is a small amount of noise in the costly signaling mechanism and punishment is considered a more expensive signal than cooperation, punishment is a better strategy. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predation promotes cooperation in Prisoner's dilemma games
    Yang, Xiqing
    Zhang, Feng
    Wang, Wanxiong
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2019, 514 : 20 - 24
  • [42] The emergence of cooperation in the random asynchronous prisoner's dilemma
    Newth D.
    Cornforth D.
    Artificial Life and Robotics, 2008, 12 (1-2) : 329 - 334
  • [43] Cooperation in stochastic games: a prisoner’s dilemma experiment
    Andrew Kloosterman
    Experimental Economics, 2020, 23 : 447 - 467
  • [44] Cooperation percolation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game
    Yang, Han-Xin
    Rong, Zhihai
    Wang, Wen-Xu
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2014, 16
  • [45] Risk consideration and cooperation in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma
    Weijun Zeng
    Minqiang Li
    Fuzan Chen
    Guofang Nan
    Soft Computing, 2016, 20 : 567 - 587
  • [46] Emergence of Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma Driven by Conformity
    Javarone, Marco Alberto
    Atzeni, Antonio Emanuele
    Galam, Serge
    APPLICATIONS OF EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, EVOAPPLICATIONS 2015, 2015, 9028 : 155 - 163
  • [47] Autonomy promotes the evolution of cooperation in prisoner's dilemma
    Li, Liang
    Chen, Chen
    Li, Aming
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2020, 102 (04)
  • [48] Physical attractiveness and cooperation in a prisoner's dilemma game
    Shinada, Mizuho
    Yamagishi, Toshio
    EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2014, 35 (06) : 451 - 455
  • [49] Survival via cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game
    Xu, Zhaojin
    Zhi, Haizhao
    Zhang, Lianzhong
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2011, 84 (05):
  • [50] Indian caste names and cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma
    Tiwari, Shambhavi
    Scigala, Karolina Aleksandra
    Schild, Christoph
    Zettler, Ingo
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 25 (03) : 489 - 503