Costly signals can facilitate cooperation and punishment in the prisoner?s dilemma

被引:0
|
作者
Guan, Kaixuan [1 ]
Chen, Yuyou [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zheng, Wanjun [2 ]
Zeng, Lulu [2 ]
Ye, Hang [2 ]
机构
[1] Ind & Commercial Bank China, Postdoctoral Res Ctr, Beijing 100140, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Ctr Econ Behav & Decis Making CEBD, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
关键词
Cooperation; Punishment; Evolutionary game theory; Costly signaling theory; The prisoner?s dilemma; SOCIAL ATTRACTIVENESS; EVOLUTION; RECIPROCITY; SELECTION; EMERGENCE; PROMOTES; FREEDOM;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2022.127997
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Costly signal is regarded as one of the mechanisms to explain the emergence of cooperation. Both the cost of cooperation and the cost of punishment can be seen as expensive cost signals. Previous research has used costly signaling theory to explain the establishment of cooperation and punishment in public goods game. However, punishment is less likely to emerge stably in the prisoner's dilemma, and the punisher cannot have additional information to identify and punish the defector. Therefore, it is particularly important to further study whether the expensive cost signal in the prisoner's dilemma can promote the emergence of cooperation and punishment. We distinguish between costly punishing signals and costly cooperative signals in this paper to look at the rule that turns payoff into fitness. The findings reveal that, without punishment, if the costly signal is weak and the cost of cooperation is not too high compared to the benefit of cooperation, cooperation is a better choice than defection. With punishment, if there is a small amount of noise in the costly signaling mechanism and punishment is considered a more expensive signal than cooperation, punishment is a better strategy. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhanced cooperation in prisoner's dilemma with aspiration
    Platkowski, Tadeusz
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS LETTERS, 2009, 22 (08) : 1161 - 1165
  • [22] COOPERATION IN THE FINITELY REPEATED PRISONER'S DILEMMA
    Embrey, Matthew
    Frechette, Guillaume R.
    Yuksel, Sevgi
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2018, 133 (01): : 509 - 551
  • [23] Understanding cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game
    Pothos, Emmanuel M.
    Perry, Gavin
    Corr, Philip J.
    Matthew, Mervin R.
    Busemeyer, Jerome R.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 51 (03) : 210 - 215
  • [24] Clans and Cooperation in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma
    Julstrom, Bryant A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION COMPANION (GECCO'12), 2012, : 1463 - 1464
  • [25] Partner choice cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma
    Qi Wang
    Zhaojin Xu
    Lianzhong Zhang
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2017, 71 : 861 - 865
  • [26] Communication and cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma games
    Bahel, Eric
    Ball, Sheryl
    Sarangi, Sudipta
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2022, 133 : 126 - 137
  • [27] Phase transitions to cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma
    Helbing, Dirk
    Lozano, Sergi
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2010, 81 (05):
  • [28] Evolving Cooperation for the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma
    Finocchiaro, Jessica
    Mathias, H. David
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION (GECCCO'19 COMPANION), 2019, : 199 - 200
  • [29] Cooperation Model with Costly Punishment
    Gradowski, T. M.
    Mrowinski, M. J.
    Kosinski, R. A.
    ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A, 2012, 121 (02) : B31 - B33
  • [30] Impact of binary social status with hierarchical punishment on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game
    Xie, Yunya
    Zhang, Shuhua
    Zhang, Zhipeng
    Bu, Hongyu
    CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2020, 130