How to make the unpopular popular? Policy characteristics, social norms and the acceptability of environmental policies

被引:125
|
作者
de Groot, Judith I. M. [1 ]
Schuitema, Geertje [2 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Sch Design Engn Comp & Psychol, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Business Adm, DK-8260 Aarhus V, Denmark
关键词
Push measures; Pull measures; Behavioural target; Policy characteristics; Social norms; Acceptability; PRIVATE CAR USE; PUBLIC ACCEPTABILITY; ENERGY POLICIES; TRANSPORT; ATTITUDES; ACTIVATION; MORALITY; BEHAVIOR; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examined how policy characteristics (i.e. push versus pull measure and high versus low cost behaviour targeted) and social norms (i.e. strong versus weak social norms) influence the acceptability of environmental policies. Results of a mixed 2 x 2 x 2 subjects design among 123 participants showed that pull measures were evaluated as more acceptable than push measures; and when environmental policies targeted high cost behaviour, participants evaluated policies as less acceptable than when low cost behaviour was targeted. Moreover, a main effect for social norms was found: when it was indicated that a minority instead of a majority of the public supported a policy, acceptability was lower. The results showed two interaction effects. That is, push measures were particularly perceived as unacceptable when: (1) they targeted high cost behaviour, and (2) when a weak social norm was experienced. When a push measure targeted low cost behaviour or when it was clear that the majority of people supported this policy, the environmental policy was almost as acceptable as pull measures. The results imply that push measures should be presented in the correct way to minimise public opposition as to make the unpopular popular. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 107
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Accessing and building social capital: How a farmer-led initiative influenced environmental policy implementation
    Collins, Heather M.
    Gray, Dave, I
    Reid, Janet, I
    Shadbolt, Nicola M.
    Dooley, Anne E.
    RURAL EXTENSION AND INNOVATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2018, 14 (01): : 73 - 82
  • [42] The Revolution Will Be Hard to Evaluate: How Co-Occurring Policy Changes Affect Research on the Health Effects of Social Policies
    Matthay, Ellicott C.
    Hagan, Erin
    Joshi, Spruha
    Tan, May Lynn
    Vlahov, David
    Adler, Nancy
    Glymour, M. Maria
    EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2021, 43 (01) : 19 - 32
  • [43] How housing welfare policies impact housing cost burdens: An analysis of housing welfare policy efficacy and household characteristics
    Kim, Saehim
    Ryu, Saebae
    Kim, Yang-Sin
    Lee, Myeong-Hun
    HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 140
  • [44] How do environmental policies affect capital market reactions? Evidence from China?s construction waste treatment policy
    Liu, Haiyue
    Wang, Yile
    Shi, Xiaoshuang
    Pang, Lina
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 198
  • [45] How does anticipatory trauma reaction and climate-friendly behaviour make an affect at the individual level? The role of social norms and self-efficacy
    Yadav, Radha
    Kumar, Dharmendra
    Kumar, Anil
    Luthra, Sunil
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 32 (07) : 4028 - 4045
  • [46] How Can Organizational Leadership Promote Environmental Behaviors through Corporate Social Responsibility Policy Adoption? The Moderating Role of Environmental Awareness
    Ting, Chih-Wen
    Li, Hung-Xin
    Chen, Kuei-Hsien
    Lee, Yue-Shi
    Yen, Show-Jane
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [47] How social, environmental, and economic CSR affects consumer-perceived value: Does perceived consumer effectiveness make a difference?
    Curras-Perez, Rafael
    Dolz-Dolz, Consuelo
    Miquel-Romero, Maria J.
    Sanchez-Garcia, Isabel
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (05) : 733 - 747
  • [48] When incumbents successfully retrench big and popular social policies: policy design matters (Apr, 10.1017/S0143814X24000102, 2024)
    Arretche, Marta
    Souza, Pedro H. G. F.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY, 2024,
  • [49] The need for environmental and social sustainability - but how to make the case, and how to achieve it? : Jonathan Michie, reviewing The progress illusion - reclaiming our future from the fairytale of economics
    Michie, Jonathan
    Erickson, Jon D.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2023, 37 (03) : 426 - 431
  • [50] How information, social norms, and experience with novel meat substitutes can create positive political feedback and demand-side policy change
    Fesenfeld, Lukas Paul
    Maier, Maiken
    Brazzola, Nicoletta
    Stolz, Niklas
    Sun, Yixian
    Kachi, Aya
    FOOD POLICY, 2023, 117