How to make the unpopular popular? Policy characteristics, social norms and the acceptability of environmental policies

被引:125
|
作者
de Groot, Judith I. M. [1 ]
Schuitema, Geertje [2 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Sch Design Engn Comp & Psychol, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Business Adm, DK-8260 Aarhus V, Denmark
关键词
Push measures; Pull measures; Behavioural target; Policy characteristics; Social norms; Acceptability; PRIVATE CAR USE; PUBLIC ACCEPTABILITY; ENERGY POLICIES; TRANSPORT; ATTITUDES; ACTIVATION; MORALITY; BEHAVIOR; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examined how policy characteristics (i.e. push versus pull measure and high versus low cost behaviour targeted) and social norms (i.e. strong versus weak social norms) influence the acceptability of environmental policies. Results of a mixed 2 x 2 x 2 subjects design among 123 participants showed that pull measures were evaluated as more acceptable than push measures; and when environmental policies targeted high cost behaviour, participants evaluated policies as less acceptable than when low cost behaviour was targeted. Moreover, a main effect for social norms was found: when it was indicated that a minority instead of a majority of the public supported a policy, acceptability was lower. The results showed two interaction effects. That is, push measures were particularly perceived as unacceptable when: (1) they targeted high cost behaviour, and (2) when a weak social norm was experienced. When a push measure targeted low cost behaviour or when it was clear that the majority of people supported this policy, the environmental policy was almost as acceptable as pull measures. The results imply that push measures should be presented in the correct way to minimise public opposition as to make the unpopular popular. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 107
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Thou Shalt Recycle: How Social Norms of Environmental Protection Narrow the Scope of the Low-Cost Hypothesis
    Keuschnigg, Marc
    Kratz, Fabian
    ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2018, 50 (10) : 1059 - 1091
  • [32] Understanding the public acceptability of road pricing and the roles of older age, social norms, pro-social values and trust for urban policy-making: The case of Bristol
    Nikitas, Alexandros
    Avineri, Erel
    Parkhurst, Graham
    CITIES, 2018, 79 : 78 - 91
  • [33] Recent Australian market mechanisms as a component of an environmental policy that can make choices between sustainability and social justice
    McKay J.
    Bjornlund H.
    Social Justice Research, 2001, 14 (4) : 387 - 403
  • [34] How to integrate social and environmental aspects in housing and urban policies: Some experiences from France and Germany
    Laigle, L
    Oehler, V
    SUSTAINABLE CITY III: URBAN REGENERATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2004, 18 : 443 - 452
  • [35] The structure of environmental governance: How public policies connect and partition California ' s oil and gas policy landscape
    Heikkila, Tanya
    Weible, Christopher M.
    Olofsson, Kristin L.
    Kagan, Jennifer A.
    You, Jongeun
    Yordy, Jill
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 284
  • [36] Smoke-free policies and the social acceptability of smoking in Uruguay and Mexico: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project
    Thrasher, James F.
    Boado, Marcelo
    Sebrie, Ernesto M.
    Bianco, Eduardo
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (06) : 591 - 599
  • [37] Images of Educational Leadership: How Principals Make Sense of Democracy and Social Justice in Two Distinct Policy Contexts
    Trujillo, Tina
    Moller, Jorunn
    Jensen, Ruth
    Kissell, Rene Espinoza
    Larsen, Eivind
    EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION QUARTERLY, 2021, 57 (04) : 536 - 569
  • [38] How Does Organizational Leadership Promote Pro-Environmental Behavior? A Moderated Mediation Model of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Policies
    Huang, Chien-Hsiang
    Chang, Tai-Wei
    Ting, Chih-Wen
    Huang, Stanley Y. B.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (11)
  • [39] Subverted expectations and social democratic austerity: How voters? reactions to policies are conditional on the policy-implementing actor
    Langsaether, Peter Egge
    Goubin, Silke
    Haugsgjerd, Atle
    ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2022, 80
  • [40] No (sociological) excuses for not going green: How do environmental activists make sense of social inequalities and relate to the working class?
    Malier, Hadrien
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL THEORY, 2021, 24 (03) : 411 - 430