An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations

被引:269
|
作者
Kelemen, Peter [1 ]
Benson, Sally M. M. [2 ]
Pilorge, Helene [3 ]
Psarras, Peter [4 ]
Wilcox, Jennifer [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, New York, NY USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Energy Resources Engn, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Chem Engn, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
[4] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Golden, CO USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE | 2019年 / 1卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
geologic storage; mineral carbonation; mineralization; carbon sequestration; negative emissions; carbon capture and storage; BASALTIC GLASS DISSOLUTION; ENHANCED OIL-RECOVERY; DEEP SALINE AQUIFERS; SULTANATE-OF-OMAN; CARBON-DIOXIDE; SAMAIL OPHIOLITE; DEHYDROXYLATED LIZARDITE; PILOT PROJECT; ACTIVATED SERPENTINE; HEAT PRETREATMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fclim.2019.00009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Since the Industrial Revolution, anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions have grown exponentially, accumulating in the atmosphere and leading to global warming. According to the IPCC (IPCC Special Report, 2018), atmospheric warming should be <2? to avoid the most serious consequences associated with climate change. This goal may be achieved in part by reducing CO2 emissions, together with capturing and sequestering CO2 from point sources. The most mature storage technique is sequestration in deep saline aquifers. In addition, CO2 can be mineralized and sequestered in solid form by various techniques, i.e., ex-situ, surficial and in situ mineralization. Ex situ and surficial approaches may produce valuable products while mitigating environmental hazards. In-situ mineralization uses ultramafic and mafic geological formations for permanent, solid storage. In addition, the IPCC portfolio that limits warming to <2? by 2100 includes avoiding CO2 emissions and removal of CO2 from air. Regardless of the specific mix of approaches, it will be essential to permanently sequester about 10 billion tons of CO2 per year by mid-century, and roughly twice that amount each year by 2100. Maximizing the potential of technologies for CO2 removal from air and CO2 storage will help to meet global climate goals. The research agenda published by National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine (2019) calls for roughly $1 billion over a 10-20 years time period to advance the deployment of CO2 sequestration in deep sedimentary reservoirs at the GtCO(2)/yr scale and develop CO2 mineralization at the MtCO(2)/yr scale. This would lead to a deeper understanding of the reservoir characteristics from the nano- to kilometer scale, some of which may include the distribution of the reaction products, the reaction rate of the minerals, the permeability evolution, the pressure build-up in the reservoir, the large-scale impact of chemicophysical processes leading to clogging or cracking, the effects of potential geochemical contamination, etc. This overview presents the advantages, drawbacks, costs, and CO2 storage potential of each technique, the current and future projects in this domain, and potential sequestration options in geologic formations around the world.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Potential CO2 leakage from geological storage sites: advances and challenges
    Mortezaei, Kimia
    Amirlatifi, Amin
    Ghazanfari, Ehsan
    Vahedifard, Farshid
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICS, 2021, 8 (01): : 3 - 27
  • [42] Carbon mineralization and geological storage of CO2 in basalt: Mechanisms and technical challenges
    Raza, Arshad
    Glatz, Guenther
    Gholami, Raoof
    Mahmoud, Mohamed
    Alafnan, Saad
    EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2022, 229
  • [43] Current status of risk assessment and regulatory frameworks for geological CO2 storage
    Stenhouse, Michael J.
    Gale, John
    Zhou, Wei
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 2455 - 2462
  • [44] CO2 storage in geological media:: Role, means, status and barriers to deployment
    Bachu, Stefan
    PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2008, 34 (02) : 254 - 273
  • [45] Effects of density and mutual solubility of a CO2-brine system on CO2 storage in geological formations: "Warm" vs. "cold" formations
    Lu, Chuan
    Han, Weon Shik
    Lee, Si-Yong
    McPherson, Brian J.
    Lichtner, Peter C.
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2009, 32 (12) : 1685 - 1702
  • [46] Current status and technical challenges of CO2 storage in coal seams and enhanced coalbed methane recovery: an overview
    Li X.
    Fang Z.-M.
    International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 2014, 1 (1): : 93 - 102
  • [47] A Comprehensive Review of Geological CO2 Sequestration in Basalt Formations
    Jeon, Hyunjeong
    Shin, Hyung Chul
    Yun, Tae Kwon
    Han, Weon Shik
    Jeong, Jaehoon
    Gwag, Jaehwii
    ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2023, 56 (03): : 311 - 330
  • [48] CO2 storage capacity of coal seams: a screening and geological review of carboniferous coal formations of Kazakhstan
    Asif, Mohammad
    Junussov, Medet
    Longinos, Sotirios
    Hazlett, Randy
    Satibekova, Sandugash
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 12 (01)
  • [49] Modeling the reactive transport of CO2-enriched fluids in clayey caprock formations in the context of CO2 geological storage
    Credoz, A.
    Bildstein, O.
    Trotignon, L.
    Jullien, M.
    WATER-ROCK INTERACTION (WRI-13), 2010, : 851 - 854
  • [50] Application of multi-well analytical models to maximize geological CO2 storage in brine formations
    Hosseini, Seyyed A.
    Kim, Seunghee
    Zeidouni, Mehdi
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 3563 - 3567