An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations

被引:269
|
作者
Kelemen, Peter [1 ]
Benson, Sally M. M. [2 ]
Pilorge, Helene [3 ]
Psarras, Peter [4 ]
Wilcox, Jennifer [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, New York, NY USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Energy Resources Engn, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Chem Engn, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
[4] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Golden, CO USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE | 2019年 / 1卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
geologic storage; mineral carbonation; mineralization; carbon sequestration; negative emissions; carbon capture and storage; BASALTIC GLASS DISSOLUTION; ENHANCED OIL-RECOVERY; DEEP SALINE AQUIFERS; SULTANATE-OF-OMAN; CARBON-DIOXIDE; SAMAIL OPHIOLITE; DEHYDROXYLATED LIZARDITE; PILOT PROJECT; ACTIVATED SERPENTINE; HEAT PRETREATMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fclim.2019.00009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Since the Industrial Revolution, anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions have grown exponentially, accumulating in the atmosphere and leading to global warming. According to the IPCC (IPCC Special Report, 2018), atmospheric warming should be <2? to avoid the most serious consequences associated with climate change. This goal may be achieved in part by reducing CO2 emissions, together with capturing and sequestering CO2 from point sources. The most mature storage technique is sequestration in deep saline aquifers. In addition, CO2 can be mineralized and sequestered in solid form by various techniques, i.e., ex-situ, surficial and in situ mineralization. Ex situ and surficial approaches may produce valuable products while mitigating environmental hazards. In-situ mineralization uses ultramafic and mafic geological formations for permanent, solid storage. In addition, the IPCC portfolio that limits warming to <2? by 2100 includes avoiding CO2 emissions and removal of CO2 from air. Regardless of the specific mix of approaches, it will be essential to permanently sequester about 10 billion tons of CO2 per year by mid-century, and roughly twice that amount each year by 2100. Maximizing the potential of technologies for CO2 removal from air and CO2 storage will help to meet global climate goals. The research agenda published by National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine (2019) calls for roughly $1 billion over a 10-20 years time period to advance the deployment of CO2 sequestration in deep sedimentary reservoirs at the GtCO(2)/yr scale and develop CO2 mineralization at the MtCO(2)/yr scale. This would lead to a deeper understanding of the reservoir characteristics from the nano- to kilometer scale, some of which may include the distribution of the reaction products, the reaction rate of the minerals, the permeability evolution, the pressure build-up in the reservoir, the large-scale impact of chemicophysical processes leading to clogging or cracking, the effects of potential geochemical contamination, etc. This overview presents the advantages, drawbacks, costs, and CO2 storage potential of each technique, the current and future projects in this domain, and potential sequestration options in geologic formations around the world.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches
    Ajayi, Temitope
    Gomes, Jorge Salgado
    Bera, Achinta
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2019, 16 (05) : 1028 - 1063
  • [32] Probabilistic modeling and global sensitivity analysis for CO2 storage in geological formations: a spectral approach
    Saad, Bilal M.
    Alexanderian, Alen
    Prudhomme, Serge
    Knio, Omar M.
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2018, 53 : 584 - 601
  • [33] An assessment of Queensland's CO2 geological storage prospectivity - the Queensland CO2 Geological Storage Atlas
    Bradshaw, Barry E.
    Spencer, Lynton K.
    Lahtinen, Anna-Liisa
    Khider, Kamal
    Ryan, Damien J.
    Colwell, Jim B.
    Chirinos, Alfredo
    Bradshaw, John
    Draper, John J.
    Hodgkinson, Jonathan
    McKillop, Mike
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 4583 - 4590
  • [34] CO2 storage capacity of geological structures located within Polish Lowlands' Mesozoic formations
    Tarkowski, Radoslaw
    GOSPODARKA SUROWCAMI MINERALNYMI-MINERAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2008, 24 (04): : 101 - 111
  • [35] Computational estimation of transport properties in poorly-consolidated formations for geological CO2 storage
    Junehee Han
    Youngseuk Keehm
    Geosciences Journal, 2017, 21 : 71 - 79
  • [36] An integrative approach to robust design and probabilistic risk assessment for CO2 storage in geological formations
    Sergey Oladyshkin
    Holger Class
    Rainer Helmig
    Wolfgang Nowak
    Computational Geosciences, 2011, 15 : 565 - 577
  • [37] A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling,monitoring and capacity estimation approaches
    Temitope Ajayi
    Jorge Salgado Gomes
    Achinta Bera
    Petroleum Science, 2019, 16 (05) : 1028 - 1063
  • [38] An integrative approach to robust design and probabilistic risk assessment for CO2 storage in geological formations
    Oladyshkin, Sergey
    Class, Holger
    Helmig, Rainer
    Nowak, Wolfgang
    COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2011, 15 (03) : 565 - 577
  • [39] Computational estimation of transport properties in poorly-consolidated formations for geological CO2 storage
    Han, Junehee
    Keehm, Youngseuk
    GEOSCIENCES JOURNAL, 2017, 21 (01) : 71 - 79
  • [40] Dissolved CO2 Storage in Geological Formations with low Pressure, low Risk and large Capacities
    Kuehn, Michael
    Kempka, Thomas
    De Lucia, Marco
    Scheck-Wenderoth, Magdalena
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 4722 - 4727