An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations

被引:269
|
作者
Kelemen, Peter [1 ]
Benson, Sally M. M. [2 ]
Pilorge, Helene [3 ]
Psarras, Peter [4 ]
Wilcox, Jennifer [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, New York, NY USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Energy Resources Engn, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Chem Engn, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
[4] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Golden, CO USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE | 2019年 / 1卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
geologic storage; mineral carbonation; mineralization; carbon sequestration; negative emissions; carbon capture and storage; BASALTIC GLASS DISSOLUTION; ENHANCED OIL-RECOVERY; DEEP SALINE AQUIFERS; SULTANATE-OF-OMAN; CARBON-DIOXIDE; SAMAIL OPHIOLITE; DEHYDROXYLATED LIZARDITE; PILOT PROJECT; ACTIVATED SERPENTINE; HEAT PRETREATMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fclim.2019.00009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Since the Industrial Revolution, anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions have grown exponentially, accumulating in the atmosphere and leading to global warming. According to the IPCC (IPCC Special Report, 2018), atmospheric warming should be <2? to avoid the most serious consequences associated with climate change. This goal may be achieved in part by reducing CO2 emissions, together with capturing and sequestering CO2 from point sources. The most mature storage technique is sequestration in deep saline aquifers. In addition, CO2 can be mineralized and sequestered in solid form by various techniques, i.e., ex-situ, surficial and in situ mineralization. Ex situ and surficial approaches may produce valuable products while mitigating environmental hazards. In-situ mineralization uses ultramafic and mafic geological formations for permanent, solid storage. In addition, the IPCC portfolio that limits warming to <2? by 2100 includes avoiding CO2 emissions and removal of CO2 from air. Regardless of the specific mix of approaches, it will be essential to permanently sequester about 10 billion tons of CO2 per year by mid-century, and roughly twice that amount each year by 2100. Maximizing the potential of technologies for CO2 removal from air and CO2 storage will help to meet global climate goals. The research agenda published by National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine (2019) calls for roughly $1 billion over a 10-20 years time period to advance the deployment of CO2 sequestration in deep sedimentary reservoirs at the GtCO(2)/yr scale and develop CO2 mineralization at the MtCO(2)/yr scale. This would lead to a deeper understanding of the reservoir characteristics from the nano- to kilometer scale, some of which may include the distribution of the reaction products, the reaction rate of the minerals, the permeability evolution, the pressure build-up in the reservoir, the large-scale impact of chemicophysical processes leading to clogging or cracking, the effects of potential geochemical contamination, etc. This overview presents the advantages, drawbacks, costs, and CO2 storage potential of each technique, the current and future projects in this domain, and potential sequestration options in geologic formations around the world.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AN OVERVIEW OF CO2 GEOLOGICAL STORAGE IN CHINA
    Qiao, Xiaojuan
    Li, Guomin
    MeDermott, Christopher I.
    Wu, Runjian
    Haszeldine, R. Stuart
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 9 (07): : 889 - 896
  • [2] Capture and geological storage of CO2:: An overview
    Rojey, A
    Torp, TA
    OIL & GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE D IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES, 2005, 60 (03): : 445 - 448
  • [3] Numerical simulation of CO2 storage in geological formations.
    Class, H
    Bielinski, A
    Helmig, R
    Kopp, A
    Ebigbo, A
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2006, 78 (04) : 445 - 452
  • [4] A study of the effect of impurities on CO2 storage capacity in geological formations
    Wang, Jinsheng
    Wang, Zhiyu
    Ryan, David
    Lan, Christopher
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 42 : 132 - 137
  • [5] Prospects for Geological Storage of CO2 in Carbonate Formations of the Adriatic Offshore
    Saftic, Bruno
    Bralic, Nikolina
    Rukavina, David
    Kolenkovic Mocilac, Iva
    Cvetkovic, Marko
    MINERALS, 2024, 14 (04)
  • [6] Identification and characterization of geological formations with CO2 storage potential in Portugal
    Pereira, Pedro
    Ribeiro, Carlos
    Carneiro, Julio
    PETROLEUM GEOSCIENCE, 2021, 27 (03)
  • [7] Selecting Geological Formations for CO2 Storage: A Comparative Rating System
    Rasool, Muhammad Hammad
    Ahmad, Maqsood
    Ayoub, Muhammad
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [8] Numerical analyses of the solubility trapping of CO2 storage in geological formations
    Meng, Qingliang
    Jiang, Xi
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 130 : 581 - 591
  • [9] CO2 Sequestration Overview in Geological Formations: Trapping Mechanisms Matrix Assessment
    Al Hameli, Fatima
    Belhaj, Hadi
    Al Dhuhoori, Mohammed
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (20)
  • [10] A Numerical Analysis of the Effects of Supercritical CO2 Injection on CO2 Storage Capacities of Geological Formations
    Khudaida, Kamal Jawher
    Das, Diganta Bhusan
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 2 (03): : 333 - 364