Optimization of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction of copper (II) by atomic absorption spectrometry as its oxinate chelate:: Application to determination of copper in different water samples
被引:146
|
作者:
Farajzadeh, Mir Ali
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Tabriz Univ, Fac Chem, Dept Analyt Chem, Tabriz, IranTabriz Univ, Fac Chem, Dept Analyt Chem, Tabriz, Iran
Farajzadeh, Mir Ali
[1
]
Bahram, Morteza
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Urmia Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, Orumiyeh, IranTabriz Univ, Fac Chem, Dept Analyt Chem, Tabriz, Iran
Bahram, Morteza
[2
]
Mehr, Behzad Ghorbani
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Urmia Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, Orumiyeh, IranTabriz Univ, Fac Chem, Dept Analyt Chem, Tabriz, Iran
dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction;
optimization;
one variable at a time;
central composite design;
atomic absorption spectrometry;
copper ion determination;
D O I:
10.1016/j.talanta.2007.12.035
中图分类号:
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号:
070302 ;
081704 ;
摘要:
In this study a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) method based on the dispersion of an extraction solvent into aqueous phase in the presence of a dispersive solvent was investigated for the preconcentration of Cu2+ ions. 8-Hydroxy quinoline was used as a chelating agent prior to extraction. Flame atomic absorption spectrometry using an acetylene-air flame was used for quantitation of the analyte after preconcentration. The effect of various experimental parameters on the extraction was investigated using two optimization methods, one variable at a time and central composite design. The experimental design was performed at five levels of the operating parameters. Nearly the same results for optimization were obtained using both methods: sample size 5 mL; volume of dispersive solvent 1.5 mL; dispersive solvent methanol; extracting solvent chloroform; extracting solvent volume 250 mu L; 8-hydroxy quinoline concentration and salt amount do not affect significantly the extraction. Under the optimum conditions the calibration graph was linear over the range 50-2000 mu g L-1. The relative standard deviation was 5.1% for six repeated determinations at a concentration of 500 mu g L-1. The limit of detection (S/N = 3) was 3 mu g L-1. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机构:
Erciyes Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, TR-38039 Kayseri, Turkey
King Saud Univ, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaErciyes Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, TR-38039 Kayseri, Turkey