Dependency of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Myocardial Viability at the LV Lead Position

被引:34
|
作者
Becker, Michael
Zwicker, Christian
Kaminski, Markus
Napp, Andreas
Altiok, Ertunc
Ocklenburg, Christina [2 ]
Friedman, Zvi [3 ]
Adam, Dan [3 ]
Schauerte, Patrick
Marx, Nikolaus
Hoffmann, Rainer [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Med Clin 1, Dept Cardiol, D-52057 Aachen, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Dept Med Stat, D-52057 Aachen, Germany
[3] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
关键词
resynchronization therapy; echocardiography; heart failure; left ventricular function; myocardial deformation imaging; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; 2-DIMENSIONAL STRAIN; LONGITUDINAL STRAIN; SCAR TISSUE; IMPROVEMENT; PREDICTORS; STIMULATION; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.01.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study sought to analyze the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) related to the viability in the segment of left ventricular (LV) lead position defined by myocardial deformation imaging. BACKGROUND Echocardiographic myocardial deformation analysis allows determination of LV lead position as well as extent of myocardial viability. METHODS Myocardial deformation imaging based on tracking of acoustic markers within 2-dimensional echo images (GE Ultrasound, GE Healthcare, Horton, Norway) was performed in 65 heart failure patients (54 +/- 6 years of age, 41 men) before and 12 months after CRT implantation. In a 16-segment model, the LV lead position was defined based on the segmental strain curve with earliest peak strain, whereas the CRT system was programmed to pure LV pacing. Nonviability of a segment (transmural scar formation) was assumed if the peak systolic circumferential strain was >-11.1%. RESULTS In 47 patients, the LV lead was placed in a viable segment, and in 18 patients, it was placed in a nonviable segment. At 12-month follow-up there was greater decrease of LV end-diastolic volumes (58 +/- 13 ml vs. 44 +/- 12 ml, p = 0.0388) and greater increase of LV ejection fraction (11 +/- 4% vs. 5 +/- 4%, p = 0.0343) and peak oxygen consumption (2.5 +/- 0.9 ml/kg/min vs. 1.7 +/- 1.1 ml/kg/min, p = 0.0465) in the viable compared with the nonviable group. The change in LV ejection fraction and the reduction in LV end-diastolic volumes at follow-up correlated to an increasing peak systolic circumferential strain in the segment of the LV pacing lead (r = 0.61, p = 0.0274 and r = 0.64, p = 0.0412, respectively). Considering only patients with ischemic heart disease, differences between viable and nonviable LV lead position group were even greater. CONCLUSIONS Preserved viability in the segment of the CRT LV lead position results in greater LV reverse remodeling and functional benefit at 12-month follow-up. Deformation imaging allows analysis of viability in the LV lead segment. (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2011;4:366-74) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 374
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cardiac resynchronization therapy using a VDD lead
    D'Ivernois, C
    Pi, S
    Hero, M
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (11): : 1240 - 1242
  • [32] Impact of left ventricular lead position on left ventricular function and remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy using myocardial deformation imaging
    Becker, M.
    Franke, A.
    Kaminski, T.
    Knackstedt, C.
    Schauerte, P.
    Kelm, M.
    Hoffmann, R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 24 - 24
  • [33] Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves myocardial conduction
    Li, Xuping
    Yang, Mei
    Yang, Dachun
    Zhou, Shenghua
    Liang, Jingjun
    Wu, Gang
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (16) : C129 - C130
  • [34] Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves myocardial conduction
    Yang, Mei
    Li, Xuping
    Yang, Dachun
    Li, Yigang
    Zhou, Shenghua
    Liang, Jinjun
    Wu, Gang
    Munoz, Freddy Del-Carpio
    Chen, Horng H.
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (02): : 238 - 246
  • [35] Effects of left ventricular lead position on cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure of different etiologies
    Sun Jia'an
    Wang Dongmei
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (16) : C156 - C156
  • [36] Go for the right left ventricular lead position at initial implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy device
    Fyenbo, Daniel Benjamin
    Kronborg, Mads Brix
    Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
    HEART RHYTHM O2, 2022, 3 (05): : 464 - 465
  • [37] Predictors for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response The Importance of QRS Morphology and Left Ventricular Lead Position
    Lin, Haiyan
    Zhou, Ying
    Xu, Geng
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 55 (03) : 256 - 263
  • [38] Long-term clinical outcome and left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Kronborg, Mads Brix
    Albertsen, Andi Eie
    Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
    Mortensen, Peter Thomas
    EUROPACE, 2009, 11 (09): : 1177 - 1182
  • [39] Association between right ventricular lead position and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Kronborg, Mads Brix
    Johansen, Jens Brock
    Riahi, Sam
    Petersen, Helen Hoegh
    Haarbo, Jens
    Jorgensen, Ole Dan
    Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
    EUROPACE, 2018, 20 (04): : 629 - 635
  • [40] Site of latest mechanical activation, left ventricular lead position and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Boogers, J. M. J.
    Chen, J.
    Van Bommel, R. J.
    Borleffs, C. J. W.
    Dibbets-Schneider, P.
    Stokkel, M. P.
    Schalij, M. J.
    Van Der Wall, E. E.
    Garcia, E. V.
    Bax, J. J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 : 17 - 17