Moral Leadership in the 2016 US Presidential Election

被引:1
|
作者
Kidd, William [1 ]
Vitriol, Joseph A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
partisanship; moral foundations; moral conviction; motivated reasoning; cognitive dissonance; POLITICAL-IDEOLOGY; PUBLIC-OPINION; FOUNDATIONS; SUPPORT; PREDISPOSITIONS; ISSUES; TRUMP;
D O I
10.1111/pops.12782
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Voters commonly revise their political beliefs to align with the political leaders with whom they strongly identify, suggesting voters lack a coherent ideological structure causally prior to their political loyalties. Alternatively, voters may organize their preferences around nonideological concepts or values, such as moral belief. Using a four-wave panel study during the 2016 election, we examine the relationship between voters' own moral foundations and their perceptions of the candidates' moral beliefs. We observed a bidirectional relationship among Republicans, who revised both their own moral beliefs and their perceptions of Donald Trump to reduce incongruities. In contrast, Democrats revised their perceptions of Hillary Clinton to align with their own moral beliefs. Importantly, consistency between voters' and political candidates' moral beliefs was more common among partisans and led to polarized evaluations of the two candidates on Election Day.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 604
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The 2016 US presidential election and media on Instagram: Who was in the lead?
    Schmidbauer, Harald
    Roesch, Angi
    Stieler, Fabian
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2018, 81 : 148 - 160
  • [32] Introduction: The 2016 US presidential election and its understated stability
    Wood, Thomas J.
    Weisberg, Herbert F.
    ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2019, 61
  • [33] Bernie Bros and the gender schism in the 2016 US presidential election
    Albrecht, Michael Mario
    FEMINIST MEDIA STUDIES, 2017, 17 (03) : 509 - +
  • [34] Partisanship and generalized trust in response to the 2016 US presidential election
    Spina, Nicholas
    SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2021,
  • [35] Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election
    Grinberg, Nir
    Joseph, Kenneth
    Friedland, Lisa
    Swire-Thompson, Briony
    Lazer, David
    SCIENCE, 2019, 363 (6425) : 374 - +
  • [36] The 2016 US Presidential Election on Facebook: An Exploratory Analysis of Sentiments
    Alashri, Saud
    Kandala, Srinivasa Srivatsav
    Bajaj, Vikash
    Parriott, Emily
    Awazu, Yukika
    Desouza, Kevin C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 51ST ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2018, : 1771 - 1780
  • [37] Rape Culture and Candidate Selection in the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Johnson, Nicole L.
    Rocchino, Gabrielle H.
    Wolf, Jacob A.
    Gutekunst, Malaika H. C.
    Paulvin, Cleopatre
    Farrell, Jerome A.
    SOCIAL POLITICS, 2021, 28 (01): : 168 - 192
  • [38] Fake news as an informational moral panic: the symbolic deviancy of social media during the 2016 US presidential election
    Carlson, Matt
    INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2020, 23 (03) : 374 - 388
  • [39] Presidential Voting in the 2016 US Presidential Election: Impacts of the US-Mexico Border and Border Integration
    Adkisson, Richard V.
    Pallares, Francisco J.
    JOURNAL OF BORDERLANDS STUDIES, 2021, 36 (01) : 31 - 47
  • [40] How did that happen? Making sense of the 2016 US presidential election result through the lens of the "leadership moment'
    Ladkin, Donna
    LEADERSHIP, 2017, 13 (04) : 393 - 412