Moral Leadership in the 2016 US Presidential Election

被引:1
|
作者
Kidd, William [1 ]
Vitriol, Joseph A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
partisanship; moral foundations; moral conviction; motivated reasoning; cognitive dissonance; POLITICAL-IDEOLOGY; PUBLIC-OPINION; FOUNDATIONS; SUPPORT; PREDISPOSITIONS; ISSUES; TRUMP;
D O I
10.1111/pops.12782
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Voters commonly revise their political beliefs to align with the political leaders with whom they strongly identify, suggesting voters lack a coherent ideological structure causally prior to their political loyalties. Alternatively, voters may organize their preferences around nonideological concepts or values, such as moral belief. Using a four-wave panel study during the 2016 election, we examine the relationship between voters' own moral foundations and their perceptions of the candidates' moral beliefs. We observed a bidirectional relationship among Republicans, who revised both their own moral beliefs and their perceptions of Donald Trump to reduce incongruities. In contrast, Democrats revised their perceptions of Hillary Clinton to align with their own moral beliefs. Importantly, consistency between voters' and political candidates' moral beliefs was more common among partisans and led to polarized evaluations of the two candidates on Election Day.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 604
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Spatial Exploration of the Halo Effect in the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Miller, Jennifer A.
    Grubesic, Tony H.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOGRAPHERS, 2021, 111 (04) : 1094 - 1109
  • [22] Using Facebook data to predict the 2016 US presidential election
    Chang, Keng-Chi
    Chiang, Chun-Fang
    Lin, Ming-Jen
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (12):
  • [23] Contraceptive decision making after the 2016 US presidential election
    Judge, Colleen P.
    Borrero, Sonya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (01) : 89 - 90
  • [24] A note on internet use and the 2016 US presidential election outcome
    Boxell, Levi
    Gentzkow, Matthew
    Shapiro, Jesse M.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [25] Latino adolescents' physiological responses to the 2016 US presidential election
    Zeiders, Katharine H.
    Nair, Rajni L.
    Hoyt, Lindsay T.
    PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 100 : S60 - S61
  • [26] Legitimacy Troubles and the Performance of Power in the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Jason L. Mast
    American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 2017, 5 : 460 - 480
  • [27] On Not Being Able to Sleep: After the US 2016 Presidential Election
    Pelias, Ronald J.
    QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2018, 24 (05) : 318 - 322
  • [28] Moral Foundations, System Justification, and Support for Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election
    Weinschenk, Aaron C.
    Dawes, Christopher T.
    FORUM-A JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN CONTEMPORARY POLITICS, 2019, 17 (02): : 195 - 208
  • [29] The 2016 US presidential election and the Stock, FX and VIX markets
    Shaikh, Imlak
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2017, 42 : 546 - 563
  • [30] The US 2016 presidential election & Russia?s troll farms
    McCombie, Stephen
    Uhlmann, Allon J.
    Morrison, Sarah
    INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY, 2020, 35 (01) : 95 - 114