Use of antagonists in ovarian stimulation protocols

被引:18
|
作者
Dal Prato, L [1 ]
Borini, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Reprod Hlth, Tecnobios Procreaz, I-40125 Bologna, Italy
关键词
GnRH agonists; GnRH antagonists; IVF; ovarian stimulation;
D O I
10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61792-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been introduced in IVF to prevent premature LH surge. They bind competitively to pituitary receptors and prevent endogenous GnRH from exerting any stimulus on pituitary cells, avoiding the initial 'flare-up' effect and decreasing gonadotrophin secretion within a few hours. Pituitary reserve and gonadotrophin synthesis are not affected; therefore, the recovery of pituitary function is rapid. Two different regimes have been described. The multiple-dose protocol involves the administration of 0.25 mg cetrorelix (or ganirelix) daily from day 6-7 of stimulation, or when the leading follicle is 14-15 mm, until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. The single-dose protocol involves the single administration of 3 mg cetrorelix on day 7-8 of stimulation. Both antagonists with either regimen seem to be equally effective in the prevention of the LH surge. Compared with a long luteal agonist protocol, the treatment is shorter and requires a smaller amount of gonadotrophins. Pregnancy rate seems to be lower, but a decrease in the incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is reported by several studies. A promising aspect of antagonists may be the possibility of making treatment less aggressive. Finally, in antagonist cycles, ovulation triggering is possible by GnRH agonists, avoiding the deleterious effect of HCG and thus preventing OHSS.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 338
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT OVARIAN STIMULATION PROTOCOLS FOR IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION
    PADOS, G
    TARLATZIS, BC
    BONTIS, J
    LAGOS, S
    PAPADIMAS, J
    SPANOS, E
    MANTALENAKIS, S
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1995, 9 (02) : 103 - 112
  • [32] Challenges and considerations in optimizing ovarian stimulation protocols in oncofertility patients
    Coyne, Kathryn
    Purdy, MacKenzie
    O'Leary, Kathleen
    Yaklic, Jerome L.
    Lindheim, Steven R.
    Appiah, Leslie A.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 2
  • [33] Ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF: is more better than less?
    Alper, Michael M.
    Fauser, Bart C.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2017, 34 (04) : 345 - 353
  • [34] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in controlled ovarian stimulation
    Diedrich, Klaus
    Felberbaum, Ricardo
    Al-Hasani, Safaa
    GYNAKOLOGE, 2020, 53 (08): : 517 - 521
  • [35] Comparison of clinical outcomes among dual ovarian stimulation, mild stimulation and luteal phase stimulation protocols in women with poor ovarian response
    Jin, Bailing
    Niu, Zhihong
    Xu, Bufang
    Chen, Qian
    Zhang, Aijun
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 34 (08) : 694 - 697
  • [36] Use of GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technologies compared to the long protocol: Meta-analysis
    Ludwig M.
    Katalinic A.
    Diedrich K.
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2001, 265 (4) : 175 - 182
  • [37] Ovarian response predictive model in different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF/ICSI treatment
    Micic, J.
    Surlan, L.
    Dotlic, J.
    Milic, N.
    Vidakovic, S.
    Radunovic, N.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 44 (06): : 923 - 928
  • [38] Ovarian stimulation for IVF in France: Choice and results according to protocols and gonadotrophin
    Rossin, B.
    Pouly, J. -L.
    Belaisch-Allart, J.
    de Mouzon, J.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2009, 37 (11-12): : 864 - 872
  • [39] COMPARING OVARIAN STIMULATION PROTOCOLS IN WOMEN UNDERGOING ELECTIVE OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION
    Michelis, L. D.
    Politch, J. A.
    Escott, V. A.
    Kuohung, W.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (03) : E192 - E192
  • [40] Granulosa-luteal cell function in vitro and ovarian stimulation protocols
    Lobb, DK
    Younglai, EV
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (01) : 195 - 196