Early Diagnosis and Severity Assessment of Acute Pancreatitis (AP) Using MR Elastography (MRE) With Spin-Echo Echo-Planar Imaging

被引:16
|
作者
Shi, Yu [1 ]
Liu, Ying [1 ]
Liu, Yan-qing [1 ]
Gao, Feng [2 ]
Li, Jia-hui [1 ]
Li, Qiu-ju [1 ]
Guo, Qi-yong [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Shengjing Hosp, Dept Radiol, 36 Sanhao St, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Dept Hepatopancreatobiliary Tumour Surg, Shengjing Hosp, Shenyang, Liaoning, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
FATTY LIVER-DISEASE; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-SPECTROSCOPY; NONALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS; HEPATIC STEATOSIS; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; ANIMAL-MODELS; MICE; QUANTIFICATION; CIRRHOSIS; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25679
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in comparison to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) for early diagnosis and prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis (AP). Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional prospective study included 76 patients with suspected AP who underwent both CE-CT and 3.0T MRE within 24 hours of hospital admission. Pancreatic stiffness, CT severity index (CTSI), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-II, and Bedside Index for Severity in AP (BISAP) scores were comparatively evaluated using data from the first 24 hours of admission, and diagnosis and severity of AP were confirmed according to the revised Atlanta Classification (2012). The accuracy of MRE for predicting disease severity was compared with that of CE-CT and the clinical scoring systems using area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) analysis. Results: AP was confirmed in 56/76 patients (73.7%). Pancreatic stiffness values of >1.47 kPa showed significantly better diagnostic performance than CE-CT (AUC: 0.993 vs. 0.818, P < 0.001) along with greater sensitivity (96.4% vs. 78.6%, P=0.006) and accuracy (96.1% vs. 81.6%, P=0.007). Ten patients (10/76; 13.2%) had clinically severe AP. The accuracy of pancreatic stiffness > 2.47 kPa was comparable to that of the CTSI, APACHE-II and BISAP scores for predicting severe AP (accuracy=85.5%, 75.0%, 88.2%, and 78.9%, respectively). The pairwise comparisons were not significant after Bonferroni correction (P < 0.008 [0.05/6]), with P values of 0.008 (MRE vs. CTSI), 0.823 (MRE vs. APACHE-II) and 0.414 (MRE vs. BISAP). Conclusion: Early MRE is a useful, noninvasive method for both diagnosis and early severity assessment of AP. We recommend MRE at hospital admission for initial evaluation of AP.
引用
收藏
页码:1311 / 1319
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MR elastography of liver at 3 Tesla: comparison of gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences and agreement across stiffness measurements
    Zhan, Chenyang
    Kannengiesser, Stephan
    Chandarana, Hersh
    Fenchel, Matthias
    Ream, Justin
    Shanbhogue, Krishna Prasad
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (05) : 1825 - 1833
  • [22] In Vivo MR Elastography of Aortic Stiffness Using Multi-Slice Spin-Echo Echo Planar Imaging Sequence: A Comparison to Gradient Recalled Echo Sequence
    Dong, H.
    Jin, N.
    White, R.
    Kolipaka, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E476 - E476
  • [23] Magnetic resonance elastography for estimating in vivo stiffness of the abdominal aorta using cardiac-gated spin-echo echo-planar imaging: a feasibility study
    Dong, Huiming
    Jin, Ning
    Kannengiesser, Stephan
    Raterman, Brian
    White, Richard D.
    Kolipaka, Arunark
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2021, 34 (01)
  • [24] Rapid magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) using fast spin-echo (FSE)
    Rydberg, JN
    Grimm, RC
    Ehman, RL
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 329 - 330
  • [25] Spin-Echo Echo-Planar Perfusion MR Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Solitary Enhancing Brain Lesions: Distinguishing Solitary Metastases from Primary Glioma
    Young, G. S.
    Setayesh, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2009, 30 (03) : 575 - 577
  • [26] Diffusion-weighted imaging of the spinal cord: Interleaved echo-planar imaging is superior to fast spin-echo
    Bammer, R
    Augustin, M
    Prokesch, RW
    Stollberger, R
    Fazekas, F
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 15 (04) : 364 - 373
  • [27] re: Comparison of Technical Failure of MR Elastography for Measuring Liver Stiffness Between Gradient-Recalled Echo and Spin-Echo Echo-Planar Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ehman, Richard L.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 51 (04) : 1103 - 1104
  • [28] How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging
    Andersson, JLR
    Skare, S
    Ashburner, J
    NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 20 (02) : 870 - 888
  • [29] Diffusion-weighted imaging of the brain: comparison of stimulated- and spin-echo echo-planar sequences
    Heiland, S
    Dietrich, O
    Sartor, K
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2001, 43 (06) : 442 - 447
  • [30] ADRENAL MASSES IN PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANCY - PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF ECHO-PLANAR, FAST SPIN-ECHO, AND CHEMICAL-SHIFT MR-IMAGING
    SCHWARTZ, LH
    PANICEK, DM
    KOUTCHER, JA
    BROWN, KT
    GETRAJDMAN, GI
    HEELAN, RT
    BURT, M
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (02) : 421 - 425