To Jump or Not to Jump: Mule Deer and White-Tailed Deer Fence Crossing Decisions

被引:22
|
作者
Burkholder, Emily N. [1 ]
Jakes, Andrew F. [1 ,3 ]
Jones, Paul F. [2 ]
Hebblewhite, Mark [1 ]
Bishop, Chad J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Wildlife Biol Program, Dept Ecosyst & Conservat Sci, WA Franke Coll Forestry & Conservat, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[2] Alberta Conservat Assoc, 817 4th Ave South 400, Lethbridge, AB T1J 0P3, Canada
[3] Natl Wildlife Federat, Prairies & Pacific Pacif Reg, Northern Rockies, 240 North Higgins Ave,Suite 2, Missoula, MT 59802 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2018年 / 42卷 / 03期
关键词
barrier; fence; modification; mule deer; Odocoileus hemionus; Odocoileus virginianus; white-tailed deer; HABITAT USE; MOVEMENTS; PRONGHORN; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.898
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Modified fencing structures have been recommended with the intention of enhancing ungulate movement. Ungulates such as mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and white-tailed deer (O. virginianus) typically negotiate fences by jumping over them. We examined 2 fine-scale fence crossing decisions to determine factors influencing 1) crossing success and 2) the mode of crossing by 2 sympatric deer species. From 2010 to 2016, we used remote cameras along fence lines in 2 study areas-Canadian Forces Base Suffield in southeastern Alberta, Canada, and The Nature Conservancy's Matador Ranch in north-central Montana, USA-that captured images of deer-fence interactions before and after fence modifications were installed. We used logistic regression to model the probability of deer successfully crossing a fence and mode of crossing (jumping over vs. crawling under) based on fence characteristics and demographic factors. We documented 486 crossing attempts, of which 313 were successful (64.4%), indicating that pasture fences acted as a semipermeable barrier to deer. Of these 313 successful attempts, 152 crawled under the fence (48.6%) as opposed to jumping over it. We documented behavioral differences in mode of crossing between species when successfully crossing a fence. Results indicate that deer are selecting known crossing sites at broad scales as places to negotiate fences, and when assessing finer scale decisions at these sites, white-tailed deer seemed to acclimate better than mule deer to our imposed changes (switched from crawling under to jumping over the fence). Though sample size was low in terms of use at modified fence sites, we recommend visually inconspicuous modifications (such as clips to increase the bottom wire height as opposed to goat-bars) when implementing pasture fencing that was friendlier for deer. We also recommend modifications be implemented strategically; placement of modifications may be just as important to consider as the modification type. (C) 2018 The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 429
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Genetic Consequences of Fence Confinement in a Population of White-Tailed Deer
    Latch, Emily K.
    Gee, Kenneth L.
    Webb, Stephen L.
    Honeycutt, Rodney L.
    DeYoung, Randy W.
    Gonzales, Robert A.
    Demarais, Stephen
    Toby, Ryan
    DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (03):
  • [32] ESCAPE GAITS OF WHITE-TAILED DEER, MULE DEER, AND THEIR HYBRIDS - BODY CONFIGURATION, BIOMECHANICS, AND FUNCTION
    LINGLE, S
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1993, 71 (04): : 708 - 724
  • [33] Mule deer do more with less: comparing their nutritional requirements and tolerances with white-tailed deer
    Staudenmaier, Anna R.
    Shipley, Lisa A.
    Camp, Meghan J.
    Forbey, Jennifer S.
    Hagerman, Ann E.
    Brandt, Abigail E.
    Thornton, Daniel H.
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2022, 103 (01) : 178 - 195
  • [34] The effect of terrain and female density on survival of neonatal white-tailed deer and mule deer fawns
    Bonar, Maegwin
    Manseau, Micheline
    Geisheimer, Justin
    Bannatyne, Travis
    Lingle, Susan
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2016, 6 (13): : 4387 - 4402
  • [35] HYBRIDIZATION OF FREE-RANGING WHITE-TAILED AND MULE DEER IN TEXAS
    STUBBLEFIELD, SS
    WARREN, RJ
    MURPHY, BR
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1986, 50 (04): : 688 - 690
  • [36] ELECTROPHORETIC IDENTIFICATION OF WHITE-TAILED AND MULE DEER FECES - A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
    SCRIBNER, KT
    WARREN, RJ
    BEASOM, SL
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1984, 48 (02): : 656 - 658
  • [37] Epidemiology of chronic wasting disease in captive white-tailed and mule deer
    Miller, MW
    Wild, MA
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 2004, 40 (02) : 320 - 327
  • [38] A PSEUDOHERMAPHRODITIC WHITE-TAILED DEER
    MARBURGER, RG
    ROBINSON, RM
    THOMAS, JW
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1966, 47 (04) : 711 - +
  • [39] THE LARYNX OF THE WHITE-TAILED DEER
    BISAILLON, A
    ACTA THERIOLOGICA, 1985, 30 (1-8): : 139 - 148
  • [40] ANESTHETIZATION OF WHITE-TAILED DEER
    SEVERINGHAUS, CW
    CORNELL VETERINARIAN, 1950, 40 (03): : 275 - 282