To Jump or Not to Jump: Mule Deer and White-Tailed Deer Fence Crossing Decisions

被引:22
|
作者
Burkholder, Emily N. [1 ]
Jakes, Andrew F. [1 ,3 ]
Jones, Paul F. [2 ]
Hebblewhite, Mark [1 ]
Bishop, Chad J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Wildlife Biol Program, Dept Ecosyst & Conservat Sci, WA Franke Coll Forestry & Conservat, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[2] Alberta Conservat Assoc, 817 4th Ave South 400, Lethbridge, AB T1J 0P3, Canada
[3] Natl Wildlife Federat, Prairies & Pacific Pacif Reg, Northern Rockies, 240 North Higgins Ave,Suite 2, Missoula, MT 59802 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2018年 / 42卷 / 03期
关键词
barrier; fence; modification; mule deer; Odocoileus hemionus; Odocoileus virginianus; white-tailed deer; HABITAT USE; MOVEMENTS; PRONGHORN; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.898
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Modified fencing structures have been recommended with the intention of enhancing ungulate movement. Ungulates such as mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and white-tailed deer (O. virginianus) typically negotiate fences by jumping over them. We examined 2 fine-scale fence crossing decisions to determine factors influencing 1) crossing success and 2) the mode of crossing by 2 sympatric deer species. From 2010 to 2016, we used remote cameras along fence lines in 2 study areas-Canadian Forces Base Suffield in southeastern Alberta, Canada, and The Nature Conservancy's Matador Ranch in north-central Montana, USA-that captured images of deer-fence interactions before and after fence modifications were installed. We used logistic regression to model the probability of deer successfully crossing a fence and mode of crossing (jumping over vs. crawling under) based on fence characteristics and demographic factors. We documented 486 crossing attempts, of which 313 were successful (64.4%), indicating that pasture fences acted as a semipermeable barrier to deer. Of these 313 successful attempts, 152 crawled under the fence (48.6%) as opposed to jumping over it. We documented behavioral differences in mode of crossing between species when successfully crossing a fence. Results indicate that deer are selecting known crossing sites at broad scales as places to negotiate fences, and when assessing finer scale decisions at these sites, white-tailed deer seemed to acclimate better than mule deer to our imposed changes (switched from crawling under to jumping over the fence). Though sample size was low in terms of use at modified fence sites, we recommend visually inconspicuous modifications (such as clips to increase the bottom wire height as opposed to goat-bars) when implementing pasture fencing that was friendlier for deer. We also recommend modifications be implemented strategically; placement of modifications may be just as important to consider as the modification type. (C) 2018 The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 429
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SERUM ASSAYS FOR DETECTING PREGNANCY IN MULE AND WHITE-TAILED DEER
    WOOD, AK
    SHORT, RE
    DARLING, AE
    DUSEK, GL
    SASSER, RG
    RUDER, CA
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1986, 50 (04): : 684 - 687
  • [22] Prion protein distribution among white-tailed deer and mule deer exocrine glands
    Ness, Anthony M.
    Saboraki, Kelsey
    Velasquez, Camilo D.
    Gushue, Danielle
    Garcia, Alicia O.
    Craig, Joshua
    Ashrafi, Taraneh
    Aiken, Judd
    Lingle, Susan
    McKenzie, Debbie
    PRION, 2019, 13 : 49 - 49
  • [23] DETECTION OF PAPILLOMAVIRUSES IN CUTANEOUS FIBROMAS OF WHITE-TAILED AND MULE DEER
    SUNDBERG, JP
    WILLIAMS, ES
    HILL, D
    LANCASTER, WD
    NIELSEN, SW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 1985, 46 (05) : 1145 - 1149
  • [24] Habitat use by sympatric mule and white-tailed deer in Texas
    Brunjes, Kristina J.
    Ballard, Warren B.
    Humphrey, Mary H.
    Harwell, Fielding
    Mcintyre, Nancy E.
    Krausman, Paul R.
    Wallace, Mark C.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2006, 70 (05): : 1351 - 1359
  • [25] Anti-predator strategies and grouping patterns in white-tailed deer and mule deer
    Lingle, S
    ETHOLOGY, 2001, 107 (04) : 295 - 314
  • [26] CHARACTERIZATION OF PAPILLOMAVIRUSES ISOLATED FROM CUTANEOUS FIBROMAS OF WHITE-TAILED DEER AND MULE DEER
    LANCASTER, WD
    SUNDBERG, JP
    VIROLOGY, 1982, 123 (01) : 212 - 216
  • [27] HABITAT RELATIONSHIPS OF WHITE-TAILED AND MULE DEER IN NORTHERN MONTANA
    MARTINKA, CJ
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1968, 32 (03): : 558 - &
  • [28] Growth and Mortality of Sympatric White-Tailed and Mule Deer Fawns
    Haskell, Shawn P.
    Ballard, Warren B.
    Mcroberts, Jon T.
    Wallace, Mark C.
    Krausman, Paul R.
    Humphrey, Mary H.
    Alcumbrac, Ole J.
    Butler, David A.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 (08): : 1417 - 1429
  • [29] Comparing the fundamental nutritional niches of mule and white-tailed deer
    Staudenmaier, Anna R.
    Shipley, Lisa A.
    Camp, Meghan J.
    Forbey, Jennifer S.
    Hagerman, Ann E.
    Brandt, Abigail E.
    Thornton, Daniel H.
    CALIFORNIA FISH AND WILDLIFE JOURNAL, 2022, 108 (03):
  • [30] MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND AGING OF MULE AND WHITE-TAILED DEER FETUSES
    SHORT, C
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1970, 34 (02): : 383 - &