Quantifying methane point sources from fine-scale satellite observations of atmospheric methane plumes

被引:176
|
作者
Varon, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ]
Jacob, Daniel J. [1 ]
McKeever, Jason [2 ]
Jervis, Dylan [2 ]
Durak, Berke O. A. [2 ]
Xia, Yan [3 ]
Huang, Yi [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] GHGSat Inc, Montreal, PQ H2W 1Y5, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Montreal, PQ H3A 0B9, Canada
关键词
IMAGING SPECTROSCOPY; EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; MISSION; SPACE; CH4; QUANTIFICATION; INSTRUMENT; OZONE; LAYER;
D O I
10.5194/amt-11-5673-2018
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Anthropogenic methane emissions originate from a large number of relatively small point sources. The planned GHGSat satellite fleet aims to quantify emissions from individual point sources by measuring methane column plumes over selected similar to 10 x 10 km(2) domains with <= 50 x 50 m(2) pixel resolution and 1 %-5 % measurement precision. Here we develop algorithms for retrieving point source rates from such measurements. We simulate a large ensemble of instantaneous methane column plumes at 50 x 50 m(2) pixel resolution for a range of atmospheric conditions using the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) in large eddy simulation (LES) mode and adding instrument noise. We show that standard methods to infer source rates by Gaussian plume inversion or source pixel mass balance are prone to large errors because the turbulence cannot be properly parameterized on the small scale of instantaneous methane plumes. The integrated mass enhancement (IME) method, which relates total plume mass to source rate, and the cross-sectional flux method, which infers source rate from fluxes across plume transects, are better adapted to the problem. We show that the IME method with local measurements of the 10 m wind speed can infer source rates with an error of 0.07-0.17 th(-1) + 5 %-12 % depending on instrument precision (1 %-5 %). The cross-sectional flux method has slightly larger errors (0.07-0.26 th(-1) + 8 %-12 %) but a simpler physical basis. For comparison, point sources larger than 0.3 th(-1) contribute more than 75 % of methane emissions reported to the US Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. Additional error applies if local wind speed measurements are not available and may dominate the overall error at low wind speeds. Low winds are beneficial for source detection but detrimental for source quantification.
引用
收藏
页码:5673 / 5686
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A lightweight NO2-to-NOx conversion model for quantifying NOx emissions of point sources from NO2 satellite observations
    Meier, Sandro
    Koene, Erik F. M.
    Krol, Maarten
    Brunner, Dominik
    Damm, Alexander
    Kuhlmann, Gerrit
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2024, 24 (13) : 7667 - 7686
  • [42] Geostationary satellite observations of extreme and transient methane emissions from oil and gas infrastructure
    Watine-Guiu, Marc
    Varona, Daniel J.
    Irakulis-Loitxatec, Itziar
    Balasusa, Nicholas
    Jacoba, Daniel J.
    Thiemens, Mark
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2023, 120 (52)
  • [43] Satellite observations reveal extreme methane leakage from a natural gas well blowout
    Pandey, Sudhanshu
    Gautam, Ritesh
    Houweling, Sander
    van der Gon, Hugo Denier
    Sadavarte, Pankaj
    Borsdorff, Tobias
    Hasekamp, Otto
    Landgraf, Jochen
    Tol, Paul
    van Kempen, Tim
    Hoogeveen, Ruud
    van Hees, Richard
    Hamburg, Steven P.
    Maasakkers, Joannes D.
    Aben, Ilse
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (52) : 26376 - 26381
  • [44] Methane emissions from China: a high-resolution inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations
    Chen, Zichong
    Jacob, Daniel J.
    Nesser, Hannah
    Sulprizio, Melissa P.
    Lorente, Alba
    Varon, Daniel J.
    Lu, Xiao
    Shen, Lu
    Qu, Zhen
    Penn, Elise
    Yu, Xueying
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2022, 22 (16) : 10809 - 10826
  • [45] Daily Satellite Observations of Methane from Oil and Gas Production Regions in the United States
    Joost A. de Gouw
    J. Pepijn Veefkind
    Esther Roosenbrand
    Barbara Dix
    John C. Lin
    Jochen Landgraf
    Pieternel F. Levelt
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [46] Daily Satellite Observations of Methane from Oil and Gas Production Regions in the United States
    de Gouw, Joost A.
    Veefkind, J. Pepijn
    Roosenbrand, Esther
    Dix, Barbara
    Lin, John C.
    Landgraf, Jochen
    Levelt, Pieternel F.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [47] What can we learn about tropospheric OH from satellite observations of methane?
    Penn, Elise
    Jacob, Daniel J.
    Chen, Zichong
    East, James D.
    Sulprizio, Melissa P.
    Bruhwiler, Lori
    Maasakkers, Joannes D.
    Nesser, Hannah
    Qu, Zhen
    Zhang, Yuzhong
    Worden, John
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2025, 25 (05) : 2947 - 2965
  • [48] STATISTICAL-MODELS OF SUMMER RAINSHOWERS DERIVED FROM FINE-SCALE RADAR OBSERVATIONS
    KONRAD, TG
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY, 1978, 17 (02): : 171 - 188
  • [49] Fine-scale infaunal community and food web patch mosaics from Barkley methane hydrates (British Columbia, Canada): The role of food quality
    Campanya-Llovet, Neus
    Snelgrove, Paul V. R.
    DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART I-OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH PAPERS, 2018, 140 : 186 - 195
  • [50] High-resolution inversion of methane emissions in the Southeast US using SEAC4RS aircraft observations of atmospheric methane: anthropogenic and wetland sources
    Sheng, Jian-Xiong
    Jacob, Daniel J.
    Turner, Alexander J.
    Maasakkers, Joannes D.
    Sulprizio, Melissa P.
    Bloom, A. Anthony
    Andrews, Arlyn E.
    Wunch, Debra
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2018, 18 (09) : 6483 - 6491