Estimating the causal effect of embryo transfer day on clinical in vitro fertilization outcomes using propensity score matching

被引:4
|
作者
Hsieh, Han-Chih [1 ]
Lee, Chun-, I [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lai, En-Yu [1 ]
Su, Jia-Ying [1 ]
Huang, Yi-Ting [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Wei-Lin [6 ]
Chen, Chien-Hong [5 ]
Huang, Chun-Chia [5 ]
Lin, Pin-Yao [5 ]
Lee, Maw-Sheng [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Liu, Mark [6 ]
Huang, Yen-Tsung [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Sinica, Inst Stat Sci, 128 Acad Rd, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Inst Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Room 501,17 Xu Zhou Rd, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[3] Chung Shan Med Univ, Inst Med, 110,Sec 1,Jianguo N Rd, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
[4] Chung Shan Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 110,Sec 1,Jianguo N Rd, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
[5] Lee Womens Hosp, Div Infertil, 30-6,Sect 1,Changping Rd, Taichung 406, Taiwan
[6] Binflux Inc, 4F-1,9 Dehui St, Taipei 104, Taiwan
关键词
Blastocyst; Cleavage-stage transfer; In vitro fertilization; Embryo transfer; Indication bias; BLASTOCYST-STAGE TRANSFER; LIVE BIRTH-RATES; IMPLANTATION RATES; ASIAN ETHNICITY; CULTURE; MORPHOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PITFALLS; BENEFITS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-021-04013-y
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background For women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), the clinical benefit of embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage (Day 5) versus cleavage stage (Day 3) remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and odds of live birth of Day 3 and Day 5 embryo transfer, and more importantly, to address the issue that patients were chosen to receive either transfer protocol due to their underlying clinical characteristics, i.e., confounding by indication. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 9,090 IVF cycles collected by Lee Women's Hospital in Taichung, Taiwan from 1998 to 2014. We utilized the method of propensity score matching to mimic a randomized controlled trial (RCT) where each patient with Day 5 transfer was matched by another patient with Day 3 transfer with respect to other clinical characteristics. Implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and odds of live birth were compared for women underwent Day 5 transfer and Day 3 transfer to estimate the causal effects. We further investigated the causal effects in subgroups by stratifying age and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH). Results Our analyses uncovered an evidence of a significant difference in implantation rate (p=0.04) favoring Day 5 transfer, and showed that Day 3 and Day 5 transfers made no difference in both odds of live birth (p=0.27) and clinical pregnancy rate (p=0.11). With the increase of gestational age, the trend toward non-significance of embryo transfer day in our result appeared to be consistent for subgroups stratified by age and AMH, while all analyses stratified by age and AMH were not statistically significant. Conclusions We conclude that for women without strong indications for Day 3 or Day 5 transfer, there is a small significant difference in implantation rate in favor of Day 5 transfer. However, the two protocols have indistinguishable outcomes on odds of live birth and clinical pregnancy rate.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Estimating the Return to College in Britain Using Regression and Propensity Score Matching
    Fan, Wen
    LABOUR-ENGLAND, 2012, 26 (01): : 31 - 45
  • [32] Effect of unplanned spontaneous follicular growth and ovulation on pregnancy outcomes in planned artificial frozen embryo transfer cycles: a propensity score matching study
    Su, Yan
    Ji, Hui
    Jiang, Wei
    Xu, Lu
    Lu, Jing
    Zhao, Chun
    Zhang, Mianqiu
    Cao, Shanren
    Ling, Xiufeng
    Shen, Rong
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 (06) : 1542 - 1551
  • [33] Neutral effect of Zishen Yutai Pill on frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a propensity score matching study
    Yang, Xiaolian
    Cai, Jiali
    Jiang, Li
    Jiang, Xiaoming
    Liu, Zhenfang
    Chen, Jinghua
    Chen, Kaijie
    Yang, Chao
    Geng, Jie
    Ma, Caihui
    Ren, Jianzhi
    Liu, Lanlan
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [34] Impact of ovarian endometriomas on clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles.
    Wong, BC
    Cabrera, RA
    Bocca, S
    Oehninger, S
    Gibbons, WE
    Stadtmauer, LA
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 : S222 - S223
  • [35] The indicator of clinical outcomes for patients with heterotopic pregnancy following in-vitro fertilization with embryo transfer
    Shang, Jianhong
    Peng, Ruan
    Zheng, Ju
    Lin, Meifang
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 58 (06): : 827 - 832
  • [36] The effects of chromosome polymorphism on the clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer-assisted reproduction
    Zhang, Xiu-ping
    Zhang, Ying-feng
    Liang, Li-xia
    Zhang, Zhi-ping
    Wu, Yuan-Xia
    Zhang, Xue-luo
    Wu, Xue-qing
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2023, 36 (02):
  • [37] CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF INCREMENTAL PERITONEAL DIALYSIS: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING STUDY
    Lee, Sumi
    Kyung, Nam Hyun
    Yun, Seung Wook
    Ki, Son Young
    Eun, Kim Seong
    Suk, An Won
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 34 : 527 - 527
  • [38] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DAY OF EMBRYO-TRANSFER AND THE OUTCOME IN HUMAN IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION AND EMBRYO-TRANSFER
    GOTO, Y
    KANZAKI, H
    NAKAYAMA, T
    TAKABATAKE, K
    HIMENO, T
    MORI, T
    NODA, Y
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1994, 11 (08) : 401 - 404
  • [39] Effects of early-cleavage embryo transfer on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer pregnancy outcomes
    Lian, W. L.
    Xin, Z. M.
    Jin, H. X.
    Song, W. Y.
    Peng, Z. F.
    Sun, Y. P.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 40 (03): : 319 - 322
  • [40] Effect of Methotrexate or Salpingectomy for Ectopic Pregnancy on Subsequent In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer Outcomes
    Pereira, Nigel
    Gerber, Deanna
    Gerber, Rachel S.
    Lekovich, Jovana P.
    Elias, Rony T.
    Spandorfer, Steven D.
    Rosenwaks, Zev
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 22 (05) : 870 - 876