Estimating the causal effect of embryo transfer day on clinical in vitro fertilization outcomes using propensity score matching

被引:4
|
作者
Hsieh, Han-Chih [1 ]
Lee, Chun-, I [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lai, En-Yu [1 ]
Su, Jia-Ying [1 ]
Huang, Yi-Ting [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Wei-Lin [6 ]
Chen, Chien-Hong [5 ]
Huang, Chun-Chia [5 ]
Lin, Pin-Yao [5 ]
Lee, Maw-Sheng [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Liu, Mark [6 ]
Huang, Yen-Tsung [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Sinica, Inst Stat Sci, 128 Acad Rd, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Inst Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Room 501,17 Xu Zhou Rd, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[3] Chung Shan Med Univ, Inst Med, 110,Sec 1,Jianguo N Rd, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
[4] Chung Shan Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 110,Sec 1,Jianguo N Rd, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
[5] Lee Womens Hosp, Div Infertil, 30-6,Sect 1,Changping Rd, Taichung 406, Taiwan
[6] Binflux Inc, 4F-1,9 Dehui St, Taipei 104, Taiwan
关键词
Blastocyst; Cleavage-stage transfer; In vitro fertilization; Embryo transfer; Indication bias; BLASTOCYST-STAGE TRANSFER; LIVE BIRTH-RATES; IMPLANTATION RATES; ASIAN ETHNICITY; CULTURE; MORPHOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PITFALLS; BENEFITS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-021-04013-y
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background For women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), the clinical benefit of embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage (Day 5) versus cleavage stage (Day 3) remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and odds of live birth of Day 3 and Day 5 embryo transfer, and more importantly, to address the issue that patients were chosen to receive either transfer protocol due to their underlying clinical characteristics, i.e., confounding by indication. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 9,090 IVF cycles collected by Lee Women's Hospital in Taichung, Taiwan from 1998 to 2014. We utilized the method of propensity score matching to mimic a randomized controlled trial (RCT) where each patient with Day 5 transfer was matched by another patient with Day 3 transfer with respect to other clinical characteristics. Implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and odds of live birth were compared for women underwent Day 5 transfer and Day 3 transfer to estimate the causal effects. We further investigated the causal effects in subgroups by stratifying age and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH). Results Our analyses uncovered an evidence of a significant difference in implantation rate (p=0.04) favoring Day 5 transfer, and showed that Day 3 and Day 5 transfers made no difference in both odds of live birth (p=0.27) and clinical pregnancy rate (p=0.11). With the increase of gestational age, the trend toward non-significance of embryo transfer day in our result appeared to be consistent for subgroups stratified by age and AMH, while all analyses stratified by age and AMH were not statistically significant. Conclusions We conclude that for women without strong indications for Day 3 or Day 5 transfer, there is a small significant difference in implantation rate in favor of Day 5 transfer. However, the two protocols have indistinguishable outcomes on odds of live birth and clinical pregnancy rate.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Clinical Outcomes of the Tuberculosis Control Program in Taiwan Using Propensity Score Matching
    Yang, Hsin-Tien
    Hsieh, Chi-Jeng
    Shen, Gwan-Han
    Yaung, Chih-Liang
    Chiou, Shang-Jyh
    POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2013, 16 (05) : 351 - 352
  • [12] Effects of atosiban on clinical outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a propensity score matching study
    Ge, Caiyun
    Zhang, Bo
    Mao, Yanhong
    Hong, Zhidan
    Zhou, Chun
    Wang, Yan
    Wang, Mei
    Ma, Ling
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 309 (03) : 1101 - 1106
  • [13] Effects of atosiban on clinical outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a propensity score matching study
    Caiyun Ge
    Bo Zhang
    Yanhong Mao
    Zhidan Hong
    Chun Zhou
    Yan Wang
    Mei Wang
    Ling Ma
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2024, 309 : 1101 - 1106
  • [14] Impact of embryo replacement depth on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes
    Tiras, Bulent
    Polat, Mehtap
    Korucuoglu, Umit
    Zeyneloglu, Hulusi Bulent
    Yarali, Hakan
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : 1341 - 1345
  • [15] EMBRYO TRANSFER MANEUVERS AND MANIPULATIONS - THE EFFECT ON IN VITRO FERTILIZATION (IVF) OUTCOMES.
    O'Leary, Briana
    Lanes, Andrea
    Thomas, Ann M.
    Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.
    Lee, Malinda S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 112 (03) : E71 - E72
  • [16] High-DNA Stainability Is Not Related to Embryonic Development and Clinical Outcomes on In Vitro Fertilization Cycles: A Retrospective Study Using a Propensity Score-Matching Analysis
    Song, Mingzhe
    Huang, Wensi
    Ye, Lijun
    Liu, Zhiqiang
    Xiao, Weiqiang
    Xiong, Feng
    Peng, Yueqin
    Cai, Jing
    Zeng, Yong
    ANDROLOGIA, 2023, 2023
  • [17] Effect of sequential embryo transfer on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Teng, Wending
    Xian, Hong
    Wang, Fang
    Wang, Yicheng
    Meng, Xiangqian
    Zhang, Xiaojian
    Shan, Xudong
    Yi, Jiangying
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [18] Perinatal complications and neonatal outcomes in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a propensity score matching cohort study
    Chen, Ying
    Zhang, Mengjie
    Gao, Yumei
    Li, Mingming
    Zheng, Wenjun
    Guo, Xueyan
    Li, Fei
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [19] Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization using fresh or frozen embryo transfer
    Zargar, Mahvash
    Dehdashti, Sorour
    Najafian, Mahin
    Choghakabodi, Parastoo Moradi
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2021, 25 (04): : 570 - 574
  • [20] USE OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING TO ASSESS THE ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY ASSAY (ERA) IN OPTIMIZING EMBRYO TRANSFER OUTCOMES.
    Bergin, Keri
    Eliner, Yael
    Vaughan, Denis A.
    Sakkas, Denny
    Duvall, Daniel W., Jr.
    Elguero, Sonia
    Penzias, Alan S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (03) : E290 - E291