Assessment of nursing students' competence in clinical practice: A systematic review of reviews

被引:99
|
作者
Immonen, Kati [1 ]
Oikarainen, Ashlee [1 ]
Tomietto, Marco [1 ]
Kaariainen, Maria [1 ,6 ]
Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria [1 ]
Kaucic, Boris Miha [2 ]
Filej, Bojana [2 ]
Riklikiene, Olga [3 ]
Vizcaya-Moreno, M. Flores [4 ]
Perez-Canaveras, Rosa M. [4 ]
De Raeve, Paul [5 ]
Mikkonen, Kristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Res Unit Nursing Sci & Hlth Management, Oulu, Finland
[2] Coll Nursing Celje, Celje, Slovenia
[3] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Fac Nursing, Kaunas, Lithuania
[4] Univ Alicante, Nursing Dept, Clin Nursing Res Croup, Alicante, Spain
[5] European Federat Nurses Assoc, Ixelles, Belgium
[6] Finnish Ctr Evidence Based Hlth Care, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Assessment; Clinical practice; Evaluation; Nursing student; Systematic review; LEARNING-ENVIRONMENT; EDUCATION; MENTORS; SUPERVISION; EXPERIENCE; PERCEPTIONS; TEACHERS; FEEDBACK; NURSES; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103414
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The assessment of nursing students' nursing competence is a matter of concern worldwide and the complexity of assessing students' clinical competence has challenged educators for decades. It has been recognized that there is inconsistency among assessment methods and tools between countries and institutions. Objective: To identify the current best evidence on the assessment of nursing students' competence in clinical practice. Design: Systematic review of reviews. Data sources: The electronic databases CINAHL, PubMed, Eric, Medic and the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports were searched in autumn 2018. Review methods: Two researchers independently assessed the eligibility of the studies by title, abstract and full-text, and then assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Analysis of study findings was conducted using the thematic synthesis approach. Results: Six reviews were included following critical appraisal. Assessment tools used to assess students' nursing competence commonly focus on the domains of professional attributes, ethical practices, communication and interpersonal relationships, nursing processes, critical thinking and reason. Clinical learning environments and mentoring provide important support structures and guide the learning of students. The availability of assessment tools and criteria along with providing individualized feedback and time for reflection strengthen the objectivity and reliability of assessment. Conclusions: There continues to be a need to develop consistent and systematic approaches in assessment, and to use reliable and valid instruments in assessment. Mentors find assessment of students' competence to be particularly challenging and emphasize the importance of clear assessment criteria, support from nurse educators and further education on assessment. Further development in feedback practices and providing students with opportunities for reflection are important in supporting the continuous learning process of students. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integrative Review of Sources of Baccalaureate Nursing Students' Clinical Practice Anxiety
    Gaberson, Kathleen B.
    Foreman, Ruth M.
    Brzustowicz, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2024, 63 (06)
  • [42] Analysis of Nursing Students Learning Experiences in Clinical Practice: Literature Review
    Kaphagawani, N. C.
    Useh, U.
    [J]. STUDIES ON ETHNO-MEDICINE, 2013, 7 (03) : 181 - 185
  • [43] Integrative Review of Sources of Baccalaureate Nursing Students' Clinical Practice Anxiety
    Foreman, Ruth
    Gaberson, Kathleen
    Brzustowicz, Richard
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2024, 73 (03) : E95 - E95
  • [44] The importance of academic literacy for undergraduate nursing students and its relationship to future professional clinical practice: A systematic review
    Jefferies, Diana
    McNally, Stephen
    Roberts, Katriona
    Wallace, Anna
    Stunden, Annette
    D'Souza, Suzanne
    Glew, Paul
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2018, 60 : 84 - 91
  • [45] Why nursing students do not report workplace bullying during clinical practice: A mixed methods systematic review☆
    Yang, Liping
    Zeng, Qinglin
    Wang, Yuqiang
    Zhou, Jing
    Zeng, Yanli
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2024, 142
  • [46] Nursing students' evaluation of clinical practice placements using the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher scale - A systematic review
    Cant, Robyn
    Ryan, Colleen
    Cooper, Simon
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2021, 104
  • [47] Portfolios and the assessment of competence in nursing: A literature review
    McCready, Tracey
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2007, 44 (01) : 143 - 151
  • [48] Supervision of nursing students in clinical practice
    Ivarjord, Lena
    Kitzmueller, Gabriele
    [J]. NORDISK SYGEPLEJEFORSKNING-NORDIC NURSING RESEARCH, 2019, 9 (01): : 6 - 19
  • [49] Nursing Students' Knowledge, Competence and Attitudes towards Vital Signs Monitoring during Clinical Practice
    Alshehry, Abdualrahman Saeed
    Cruz, Jonas Preposi
    Bashtawi, Meshrif Ahmad
    Almutairi, Khalid Obaid
    Tumala, Regie B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2021, 30 (5-6) : 664 - 675
  • [50] Mentors' competence in mentoring nursing students in clinical practice: Detecting profiles to enhance mentoring practices
    Mikkonen, Kristina
    Tomietto, Marco
    Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria
    Miha Kaucic, Boris
    Riklikiene, Olga
    Vizcaya-Moreno, Flores
    Perez-Canaveras, Rosa M.
    Filej, Bojana
    Baltinaite, Giedre
    Cicolini, Giancarlo
    Kaariainen, Maria
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2022, 9 (01): : 593 - 603