Assessment of nursing students' competence in clinical practice: A systematic review of reviews

被引:99
|
作者
Immonen, Kati [1 ]
Oikarainen, Ashlee [1 ]
Tomietto, Marco [1 ]
Kaariainen, Maria [1 ,6 ]
Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria [1 ]
Kaucic, Boris Miha [2 ]
Filej, Bojana [2 ]
Riklikiene, Olga [3 ]
Vizcaya-Moreno, M. Flores [4 ]
Perez-Canaveras, Rosa M. [4 ]
De Raeve, Paul [5 ]
Mikkonen, Kristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Res Unit Nursing Sci & Hlth Management, Oulu, Finland
[2] Coll Nursing Celje, Celje, Slovenia
[3] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Fac Nursing, Kaunas, Lithuania
[4] Univ Alicante, Nursing Dept, Clin Nursing Res Croup, Alicante, Spain
[5] European Federat Nurses Assoc, Ixelles, Belgium
[6] Finnish Ctr Evidence Based Hlth Care, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Assessment; Clinical practice; Evaluation; Nursing student; Systematic review; LEARNING-ENVIRONMENT; EDUCATION; MENTORS; SUPERVISION; EXPERIENCE; PERCEPTIONS; TEACHERS; FEEDBACK; NURSES; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103414
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The assessment of nursing students' nursing competence is a matter of concern worldwide and the complexity of assessing students' clinical competence has challenged educators for decades. It has been recognized that there is inconsistency among assessment methods and tools between countries and institutions. Objective: To identify the current best evidence on the assessment of nursing students' competence in clinical practice. Design: Systematic review of reviews. Data sources: The electronic databases CINAHL, PubMed, Eric, Medic and the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports were searched in autumn 2018. Review methods: Two researchers independently assessed the eligibility of the studies by title, abstract and full-text, and then assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Analysis of study findings was conducted using the thematic synthesis approach. Results: Six reviews were included following critical appraisal. Assessment tools used to assess students' nursing competence commonly focus on the domains of professional attributes, ethical practices, communication and interpersonal relationships, nursing processes, critical thinking and reason. Clinical learning environments and mentoring provide important support structures and guide the learning of students. The availability of assessment tools and criteria along with providing individualized feedback and time for reflection strengthen the objectivity and reliability of assessment. Conclusions: There continues to be a need to develop consistent and systematic approaches in assessment, and to use reliable and valid instruments in assessment. Mentors find assessment of students' competence to be particularly challenging and emphasize the importance of clear assessment criteria, support from nurse educators and further education on assessment. Further development in feedback practices and providing students with opportunities for reflection are important in supporting the continuous learning process of students. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Objective structured clinical examination vs traditional clinical examination to evaluate students' clinical competence: A systematic review of nursing faculty and students' perceptions and experiences
    Vincent, Sophia Cyril
    Arulappan, Judie
    Amirtharaj, Anandhi
    Matua, Gerald Amandu
    Al Hashmi, Iman
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2022, 108
  • [22] Nursing students' exposure to violence in clinical practice and violence management competence levels
    Aksoy, Fatma
    Bayram, Sule Biyik
    Ozsaban, Aysel
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2024, 139
  • [23] A global perspective of advanced practice nursing research: A review of systematic reviews protocol
    Kilpatrick, Kelley
    Savard, Isabelle
    Audet, Li-Anne
    Kra-Friedman, Abby
    Atallah, Renee
    Jabbour, Mira
    Zhou, Wentao
    Wheeler, Kathy
    Ladd, Elissa
    Gray, Deborah C. C.
    Henderson, Colette
    Spies, Lori A. A.
    McGrath, Heather
    Rogers, Melanie
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [24] Effectiveness of Educational Programs for Clinical Competence in Family Nursing: A Systematic Review
    Gutierrez-Aleman, Teresa
    Esandi, Nuria
    Pardavila-Belio, Miren, I
    Pueyo-Garrigues, Maria
    Canga-Armayor, Navidad
    Alfaro-Diaz, Cristina
    Canga-Armayor, Ana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING, 2021, 27 (04) : 255 - 274
  • [25] Clinical simulation for nursing competence development in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: systematic review
    Garcia Nascimento, Juliana da Silva
    Nascimento, Kleiton Goncalves
    Gouvea de Oliveira, Jordana Luiza
    Alves, Mateus Goulart
    da Silva, Aline Roberta
    Barcellos Dalri, Maria Celia
    [J]. REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2020, 28 : e3391
  • [26] Undergraduate nursing students' perspectives on clinical assessment at transition to practice
    Wu, Xi Vivien
    Wang, Wenru
    Pua, Lay Hoon
    Heng, Doreen Gek Noi
    Enskaer, Karin
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2015, 51 (2-3) : 272 - 285
  • [27] Clinical Stress and Clinical Performance in Prelicensure Nursing Students: A Systematic Review
    Welch, Susan R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2023, 62 (01) : 36 - +
  • [28] COMPETENCE SELF-ASSESSMENT OF NURSING STUDENTS
    Vulinec, Stefanija Ozimec
    [J]. VII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF GENERAL NURSES AND WORKERS EDUCATING PARAMEDICAL STAFF, 2013, : 102 - 109
  • [29] Medication errors by nursing students on clinical practice: An integrative review
    Stolic, Snezana
    Ng, Linda
    Southern, Joanne
    Sheridan, Georgina
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2022, 112
  • [30] Anaesthesia nursing competence: Self-assessment of nursing students
    Jeon, Yunsuk
    Ritmala-Castren, Marita
    Meretoja, Riitta
    Vahlberg, Tero
    Leino-Kilpi, Helena
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2020, 94