Assessment of nursing students' competence in clinical practice: A systematic review of reviews

被引:99
|
作者
Immonen, Kati [1 ]
Oikarainen, Ashlee [1 ]
Tomietto, Marco [1 ]
Kaariainen, Maria [1 ,6 ]
Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria [1 ]
Kaucic, Boris Miha [2 ]
Filej, Bojana [2 ]
Riklikiene, Olga [3 ]
Vizcaya-Moreno, M. Flores [4 ]
Perez-Canaveras, Rosa M. [4 ]
De Raeve, Paul [5 ]
Mikkonen, Kristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Res Unit Nursing Sci & Hlth Management, Oulu, Finland
[2] Coll Nursing Celje, Celje, Slovenia
[3] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Fac Nursing, Kaunas, Lithuania
[4] Univ Alicante, Nursing Dept, Clin Nursing Res Croup, Alicante, Spain
[5] European Federat Nurses Assoc, Ixelles, Belgium
[6] Finnish Ctr Evidence Based Hlth Care, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Assessment; Clinical practice; Evaluation; Nursing student; Systematic review; LEARNING-ENVIRONMENT; EDUCATION; MENTORS; SUPERVISION; EXPERIENCE; PERCEPTIONS; TEACHERS; FEEDBACK; NURSES; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103414
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The assessment of nursing students' nursing competence is a matter of concern worldwide and the complexity of assessing students' clinical competence has challenged educators for decades. It has been recognized that there is inconsistency among assessment methods and tools between countries and institutions. Objective: To identify the current best evidence on the assessment of nursing students' competence in clinical practice. Design: Systematic review of reviews. Data sources: The electronic databases CINAHL, PubMed, Eric, Medic and the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports were searched in autumn 2018. Review methods: Two researchers independently assessed the eligibility of the studies by title, abstract and full-text, and then assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Analysis of study findings was conducted using the thematic synthesis approach. Results: Six reviews were included following critical appraisal. Assessment tools used to assess students' nursing competence commonly focus on the domains of professional attributes, ethical practices, communication and interpersonal relationships, nursing processes, critical thinking and reason. Clinical learning environments and mentoring provide important support structures and guide the learning of students. The availability of assessment tools and criteria along with providing individualized feedback and time for reflection strengthen the objectivity and reliability of assessment. Conclusions: There continues to be a need to develop consistent and systematic approaches in assessment, and to use reliable and valid instruments in assessment. Mentors find assessment of students' competence to be particularly challenging and emphasize the importance of clear assessment criteria, support from nurse educators and further education on assessment. Further development in feedback practices and providing students with opportunities for reflection are important in supporting the continuous learning process of students. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical competence assessment in nursing: a systematic review of the literature
    Watson, R
    Stimpson, A
    Topping, A
    Porock, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2002, 39 (05) : 421 - 431
  • [2] A systematic review of clinical assessment for undergraduate nursing students
    Wu, Xi Vivien
    Enskar, Karin
    Lee, Cindy Ching Siang
    Wang, Wenru
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2015, 35 (02) : 347 - 359
  • [3] Nurses' experiences of their competence at mentoring nursing students during clinical practice: A systematic review of qualitative studies
    Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria
    Ruotsalainen, Heidi
    Mikkonen, Kristina
    Kaariainen, Maria
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2020, 85
  • [4] A review of clinical competence assessment in nursing
    Chen Yanhua
    Watson, Roger
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2011, 31 (08) : 832 - 836
  • [5] Mentors' self-assessed competence in mentoring nursing students in clinical practice: A systematic review of quantitative studies
    Pramila-Savukoski, Sari
    Juntunen, Jonna
    Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria
    Kaariainen, Maria
    Tomietto, Marco
    Kaucic, Boris Miha
    Filej, Bojana
    Riklikiene, Olga
    Vizcaya-Moreno, Maria Flores
    Perez-Canaveras, Rosa M.
    De Raeve, Paul
    Mikkonen, Kristina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2020, 29 (5-6) : 684 - 705
  • [6] Assessing preregistration nursing students' clinical competence: A systematic review of objective measures
    Cant, Robyn
    McKenna, Lisa
    Cooper, Simon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2013, 19 (02) : 163 - 176
  • [7] Nursing and midwifery students' encounters with poor clinical practice: A systematic review
    Ion, Robin
    Smith, Kate
    Dickens, Geoff
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2017, 23 : 67 - 75
  • [8] Assessing the Competence of Nursing Students in Clinical Practice: The Clinical Preceptors' Perspective
    Alkhelaiwi, Watin Arif
    Traynor, Marian
    Rogers, Katherine
    Wilson, Iseult
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [9] Assessing competence in undergraduate nursing students: The Amalgamated Students Assessment in Practice model
    Zasadny, Mark F.
    Bull, Rosalind M.
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2015, 15 (02) : 126 - 133
  • [10] Nursing students' experience of workplace violence in clinical practice: A qualitative systematic review
    Dafny, Hila Ariela
    McCloud, Christine
    Pearson, Vincent
    Brown, Shannon
    Phillips, Craig
    Waheed, Nasreena
    Freeling, Michelle
    Parry, Yvonne Karen
    Champion, Stephanie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (17-18) : 6136 - 6164