The Strengths Assessment Inventory: Reliability of a New Measure of Psychosocial Strengths for Youth

被引:14
|
作者
Brazeau, James N. [2 ]
Teatero, Missy L. [2 ]
Rawana, Edward P. [2 ]
Brownlee, Keith [1 ]
Blanchette, Loretta R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Lakehead Univ, Sch Social Work, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
[2] Lakehead Univ, Dept Psychol, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
关键词
Strengths; Assessment; Positive psychology; Youth; Reliability; GUIDE;
D O I
10.1007/s10826-011-9489-5
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
A new measure, the Strengths Assessment Inventory-Youth self-report (SAI-Y), was recently developed to assess the strengths of children and adolescents between the ages of 10 and 18 years. The SAI-Y differs from similar measures in that it provides a comprehensive assessment of strengths that are intrinsic to the individual as well as strengths associated with an individual's interaction with his or her environment. Based on over 10 years of test development as well as previous research, the 120 items of the SAI-Y contribute to 11 content scales (e.g., Strengths at Home) and 12 empirical scales (e.g., Commitment to Family Values). The purpose of the current report is to describe the procedure that guided the development of the SAI-Y coupled with an initial study of the psychometric properties of the instrument. The SAI-Y was administered to 572 elementary and secondary school students of which 455 also completed the measure following a one- to two-week interval. Based on this data, the following psychometric properties were examined: internal consistency, standard error of measurement, and test-retest reliability. Overall, results indicated that the SAI-Y demonstrates acceptable to good levels of reliability and may be a valuable addition to current measures that assess aspects of positive functioning. Ongoing research projects and future directions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 390
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Character Strengths Among Youth
    Tracy A. Steen
    Lauren V. Kachorek
    Christopher Peterson
    Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2003, 32 : 5 - 16
  • [22] Character strengths among youth
    Steen, TA
    Kachorek, LV
    Peterson, C
    JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 2003, 32 (01) : 5 - 16
  • [23] Development and validation of a new instrument to measure nursing students compassion strengths: The Bolton Compassion Strengths Indicators
    Durkin, Mark
    Gurbutt, Russell
    Carson, Jerome
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2020, 46
  • [24] Validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth (VIA-Youth) among South African learners
    van Eeden, Chrizanne
    Wissing, Marie P.
    Dreyer, Jeanette
    Park, Nansook
    Peterson, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY IN AFRICA, 2008, 18 (01) : 143 - 154
  • [25] Assessing Character Strengths in Youth With Intellectual Disability: Reliability and Factorial Validity of the VIA-Youth
    Shogren, Karrie A.
    Shaw, Leslie A.
    Raley, Sheida K.
    Wehmeyer, Michael L.
    Niemiec, Ryan M.
    Adkins, Megan
    INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2018, 56 (01) : 13 - 29
  • [26] The preschool strengths inventory: development and validation
    Owens, Rhea L.
    Patterson, Meagan M.
    Multon, Karen D.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 16
  • [27] Hebrew Adaptation of the VIA Inventory of Strengths
    Littman-Ovadia, Hadassah
    Lavy, Shiri
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2012, 28 (01) : 41 - 50
  • [28] The short form of the VIA Inventory of Strengths
    Azanedo, Carolina M.
    Fernandez-Abascal, Enrique G.
    Barraca, Jorge
    PSICOTHEMA, 2017, 29 (02) : 254 - 260
  • [29] Coachees experiences of strengths-based coaching when identifying their strengths with the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS)
    Simmons, Phoebe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED COACHING & MENTORING, 2023, : 179 - 192
  • [30] The transdiagnostic nature of distress tolerance: Strengths, detriments, and a new measure
    Goodman, Fallon R.
    Alexander, Lisa A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 637 - 638