Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders

被引:154
|
作者
Falagario, Marco [1 ]
Sciancalepore, Fabio [1 ]
Costantino, Nicola [1 ]
Pietroforte, Roberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Bari, Dipartimento Ingn Meccan & Gest, I-70126 Bari, Italy
[2] Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
关键词
Auctions/bidding; Data envelopment analysis; Supplier selection; Decision analysis; Multiple criteria analysis; SUPPLIER SELECTION; DECISION-MAKING; UTILITY; SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; CONTRACT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.031
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The paper addresses the topic of supplier selection in public procurement. According to European directives, when tenders are awarded through the Most Economically Advantageous Tender" (MEAT) criterion, the awarding committee has to decide the tender evaluation criteria of the presented bids in advance. The authors propose a decision making tool that is aimed at helping the awarding committee in this difficult task and, at the same time, maintaining a transparent procedure in accordance with governmental procurement regulations and requirements as well as guaranteeing fair and equal evaluation of all bids. In this regard, the decision problem of supplier selection is addressed by applying an extension of the DEA (data envelopment analysis) methodology. The cross-efficiency evaluation is used for selecting the best supplier among the eligible candidates. The proposed technique allows the evaluation of quantitative data related to vendor selection and keeps the transparency features requested by public procurement. In addition, all bids are equally assessed according to the same objectively defined weights without any subjective setting by the public officers. The effectiveness and efficiency of the approach is supported by a case study that pertains to the tender of an Italian public agency. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 529
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Informal practices and efficiency in public procurement
    Rodionova, Yuliya
    Nemec, Juraj
    Tkachenko, Andrey
    Yakovlev, Andrei
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 44 (03) : 225 - 233
  • [32] ASSESSMENT SYSTEM OF THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT EFFICIENCY
    Pysmenna, Mariia
    Pohribna, Nataliia
    Kalnytska, Maryna
    BALTIC JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 5 (05) : 136 - 144
  • [33] Award Price Estimator for Public Procurement Auctions Using Machine Learning Algorithms: Case Study with Tenders from Spain
    Garcia Rodriguez, Manuel J.
    Rodriguez Montequin, Vicente
    Aranguren Ubierna, Andoni
    Santana Hermida, Roberto
    Sierra Araujo, Basilio
    Zelaia Jauregi, Ana
    STUDIES IN INFORMATICS AND CONTROL, 2021, 30 (04): : 67 - 76
  • [34] Pareto approach for DEA cross efficiency evaluation based on interval programming
    Huang, Yan
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 33 (04) : 2375 - 2389
  • [35] Dea approach for the current and the cross period efficiency for evaluating the vocational education
    Liu, LC
    Lee, C
    Tzeng, GH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2004, 3 (02) : 353 - 374
  • [36] Ranking DMUs in the DEA context using super and cross efficiency
    Jeong, Byungho
    Ha, Jae-Won
    Ok, Chang-Soo
    THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING: WKDD 2010, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, : 212 - 215
  • [37] AN ECONOMIC APPROACH TO PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
    Chen, Tsong Ho
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, 2008, 8 (03) : 407 - 430
  • [38] An Emergent Approach to Public Procurement
    Fletcher, Jo
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT, 2006, 12 (01): : 75 - 91
  • [39] DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model to Urban Public Infrastructure Investment Comprehensive Efficiency of China
    Sun, Yu
    Huang, Huixia
    Zhou, Chi
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2016, 2016