DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model to Urban Public Infrastructure Investment Comprehensive Efficiency of China

被引:49
|
作者
Sun, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Huixia [1 ]
Zhou, Chi [3 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ Commerce, Sch Publ Adm, Tianjin 300134, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ Technol, Sch Management, Tianjin 300384, Peoples R China
关键词
RESOURCE;
D O I
10.1155/2016/9814313
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In managerial application, data envelopment analysis (DEA) is used by numerous studies to evaluate performances and solve the allocation problem. As the problem of infrastructure investment becomes more and more important in Chinese cities, it is of vital necessity to evaluate the investment efficiency and assign the fund. In practice, there are competitions among cities due to the scarcity of investment funds. However, the traditional DEA model is a pure self-evaluation model without considering the impacts of the other decision-making units (DMUs). Even though using the cross-efficiency model can figure out the best multiplier bundle for the unit and other DMUs, the solution is not unique. Therefore, this paper introduces the game theory into DEA cross-efficiency model to evaluate the infrastructure investment efficiency when cities compete with each other. In this paper, we analyze the case involving 30 provincial capital cities of China. And the result shows that the approach can accomplish a unique and efficient solution for each city (DMU) after the investment fund is allocated as an input variable.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A DEA game cross-efficiency based improved method for measuring urban carbon emission efficiency in China
    Li, Jinfa
    Guo, Jiahui
    Du, Xiaoyun
    Jiang, Hongbing
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 31 (14) : 22087 - 22101
  • [2] The DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model and Its Nash Equilibrium
    Liang, Liang
    Wu, Jie
    Cook, Wade D.
    Zhu, Joe
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2008, 56 (05) : 1278 - 1288
  • [3] A DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model with Loss Aversion for Contractor Selection
    Huang, Huixia
    Zhou, Chi
    Deng, Hepu
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [4] DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings
    Wu, Jie
    Liang, Liang
    Chen, Yao
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 37 (04): : 909 - 918
  • [5] Study on the Rural Revitalization and Urban-Rural Integration Efficiency in Anhui Province Based on Game Cross-Efficiency DEA Model
    Sun, Shanhui
    Zhang, Ni-Ni
    Liu, Jia-Bao
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 2022
  • [6] The DEA Game Cross-efficiency Model for Supplier Selection Problem under Competition
    Ma, Ruimin
    Yao, Lifei
    Jin, Maozhu
    Ren, Peiyu
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS & INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 8 (02): : 811 - 818
  • [7] The measurement and influences of China's urban total factor energy efficiency under environmental pollution: Based on the game cross-efficiency DEA
    Yang, Zhongshan
    Wei, Xiaoxue
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 209 : 439 - 450
  • [8] Research on the efficiency of agro-tourism integration in China: Based on the DEA cross-efficiency model
    Li, Huajin
    Zhang, Songbiao
    Deng, Yue
    Wang, Huilin
    [J]. AIMS MATHEMATICS, 2023, 8 (10): : 23164 - 23182
  • [9] Efficiency Evaluation of China's Provincial Digital Economy Based on a DEA Cross-Efficiency Model
    Xu, Yaqiao
    Hu, Jiayi
    Wu, Liusan
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (13)
  • [10] Cross-efficiency in DEA: A maximum resonated appreciative model
    Oral, Muhittin
    Amin, Gholam R.
    Oukil, Amar
    [J]. MEASUREMENT, 2015, 63 : 159 - 167