A Systematic Review Protocol to Identify the Key Benefits and Associated Program Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations

被引:3
|
作者
Tracey, Danielle [1 ]
Gray, Tonia [2 ]
Sweeting, Joanna [2 ]
Kingsley, Jonathan [3 ]
Bailey, Aisling [4 ]
Pettitt, Philip [5 ]
机构
[1] Western Sydney Univ, Ctr Educ Res, Translat Hlth Res Inst, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Ctr Educ Res, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia
[3] Swinburne Univ Technol, Sch Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3122, Australia
[4] Swinburne Univ Technol, Sch Social Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3122, Australia
[5] Bot Gardens & Centennial Parklands, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
关键词
community gardening; vulnerable; health; well-being; social inclusion; systematic review; protocol; HEALTH; FOOD; FRUIT;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17062029
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Gardening has long been a popular pastime. There is a growing evidence base for the health and well-being benefits of gardening. Community gardening brings a social aspect to gardening, thereby increasing the potential benefits to include addressing social inclusion and poor community health through sharing of values, support of others, and building networks. This systematic review protocol aims to determine the characteristics of community gardening that could lead to beneficial outcomes such as connection with the community and development of new skills. Thirteen academic databases will be searched for studies looking at the benefits of community gardening, with a focus on vulnerable populations. Data will be extracted from all studies meeting the inclusion criteria and summarized to provide an overview of the current literature. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive investigation into community gardening, its benefits, and how they are achieved for the target population. By gathering and synthesizing this information, the review should allow policy makers and practitioners to work more effectively to address health and social inequities, by highlighting areas of need and enabling optimization of future interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics.
    Portalupi S.
    von Elm E.
    Schmucker C.
    Lang B.
    Motschall E.
    Schwarzer G.
    Gross I.T.
    Scherer R.W.
    Bassler D.
    Meerpohl J.J.
    OPEN Consortium
    Systematic Reviews, 2 (1) : 2
  • [32] Epidemiology, tumour characteristics, treatment and outcomes associated with spinal nerve sheath tumours: a systematic review protocol
    Mahdi, Omar Ali
    Gharios, Maria
    Fatfat, Adnan
    El-Hajj, Victor Gabriel
    Singh, Aman
    Edstroem, Erik
    Elmi-Terander, Adrian
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (10):
  • [33] Global, regional, and national prevalence of hepatitis B infection in the general and key populations living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Leumi, Steve
    Bigna, Jean Joel
    Amougou, Marie A.
    Aminde, Leopold N.
    Nyaga, Ulrich Flore
    Noubiap, Jean Jacques
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [34] Global, regional, and national prevalence of hepatitis B infection in the general and key populations living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Steve Leumi
    Jean Joel Bigna
    Marie A. Amougou
    Leopold N. Aminde
    Ulrich Flore Nyaga
    Jean Jacques Noubiap
    Systematic Reviews, 7
  • [35] Examining ways in which contact opportunities associated with transfers might help identify vulnerable households and link them with social welfare services: A systematic review of the literature
    Sherr, Lorraine
    Rodgers, Anna
    Varrall, Rebecca
    Mueller, Joanne
    Adato, Michelle
    VULNERABLE CHILDREN AND YOUTH STUDIES, 2009, 4 : 10 - 40
  • [36] Effects of eHealth interventions on physical activity and weight among pregnant and postpartum women and the sociodemographic characteristics of study populations: a systematic review protocol
    Gamble, Abigail
    Baskin, Monica L.
    Cranston, Katherine L.
    Herring, Sharon J.
    Hinton, Elizabeth
    Saulters, Mary Margaret
    Moore, Justin B.
    Welsch, Michael A.
    Beech, Bettina M.
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (11) : 2396 - 2403
  • [37] PROTOCOL: Key characteristics of effective preschool-based interventions to promote self-regulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kanayama, Atsushi
    Siraj, Iram
    Moeyaert, Mariola
    Steiner, Kat
    Yu, Elie ChingYen
    Ereky-Stevens, Katharina
    Iwasa, Kaoru
    Ishikawa, Moeko
    Kahlon, Mehar
    Warnatsch, Rahel
    Dascalu, Andreea
    He, Ruoying
    Mehta, Pinal P.
    Robinson, Natasha
    Shi, Yining
    CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 20 (02)
  • [38] Identifying the key characteristics of a culturally safe mental health service for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: A qualitative systematic review protocol
    Milroy, Helen
    Kashyap, Shraddha
    Collova, Jemma R.
    Platell, Monique
    Gee, Graham
    Ohan, Jeneva L.
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [39] Midwifery-led antenatal care models: mapping a systematic review to an evidence-based quality framework to identify key components and characteristics of care
    Andrew Symon
    Jan Pringle
    Helen Cheyne
    Soo Downe
    Vanora Hundley
    Elaine Lee
    Fiona Lynn
    Alison McFadden
    Jenny McNeill
    Mary J Renfrew
    Mary Ross-Davie
    Edwin van Teijlingen
    Heather Whitford
    Fiona Alderdice
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16
  • [40] Midwifery-led antenatal care models: mapping a systematic review to an evidence-based quality framework to identify key components and characteristics of care
    Symon, Andrew
    Pringle, Jan
    Cheyne, Helen
    Downe, Soo
    Hundley, Vanora
    Lee, Elaine
    Lynn, Fiona
    McFadden, Alison
    McNeill, Jenny
    Renfrew, Mary J.
    Ross-Davie, Mary
    van Teijlingen, Edwin
    Whitford, Heather
    Alderdice, Fiona
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16