A Systematic Review Protocol to Identify the Key Benefits and Associated Program Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations

被引:3
|
作者
Tracey, Danielle [1 ]
Gray, Tonia [2 ]
Sweeting, Joanna [2 ]
Kingsley, Jonathan [3 ]
Bailey, Aisling [4 ]
Pettitt, Philip [5 ]
机构
[1] Western Sydney Univ, Ctr Educ Res, Translat Hlth Res Inst, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Ctr Educ Res, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia
[3] Swinburne Univ Technol, Sch Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3122, Australia
[4] Swinburne Univ Technol, Sch Social Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3122, Australia
[5] Bot Gardens & Centennial Parklands, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
关键词
community gardening; vulnerable; health; well-being; social inclusion; systematic review; protocol; HEALTH; FOOD; FRUIT;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17062029
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Gardening has long been a popular pastime. There is a growing evidence base for the health and well-being benefits of gardening. Community gardening brings a social aspect to gardening, thereby increasing the potential benefits to include addressing social inclusion and poor community health through sharing of values, support of others, and building networks. This systematic review protocol aims to determine the characteristics of community gardening that could lead to beneficial outcomes such as connection with the community and development of new skills. Thirteen academic databases will be searched for studies looking at the benefits of community gardening, with a focus on vulnerable populations. Data will be extracted from all studies meeting the inclusion criteria and summarized to provide an overview of the current literature. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive investigation into community gardening, its benefits, and how they are achieved for the target population. By gathering and synthesizing this information, the review should allow policy makers and practitioners to work more effectively to address health and social inequities, by highlighting areas of need and enabling optimization of future interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] HIV-related data among key populations to inform evidence-based responses: protocol of a systematic review
    Amrita Rao
    Sheree Schwartz
    Keith Sabin
    Tisha Wheeler
    Jinkou Zhao
    James Hargreaves
    Stefan Baral
    Systematic Reviews, 7
  • [22] HIV-related data among key populations to inform evidence-based responses: protocol of a systematic review
    Rao, Amrita
    Schwartz, Sheree
    Sabin, Keith
    Wheeler, Tisha
    Zhao, Jinkou
    Hargreaves, James
    Baral, Stefan
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [23] Effects of Community-Based Health Worker Interventions to Improve Chronic Disease Management and Care Among Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review
    Kim, Kyounghae
    Choi, Janet S.
    Choi, Eunsuk
    Nieman, Carrie L.
    Joo, Jin Hui
    Lin, Frank R.
    Gitlin, Laura N.
    Han, Hae-Ra
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 106 (04) : E3 - E28
  • [24] The characteristics of national health initiatives promoting earlier cancer diagnosis among adult populations: a systematic review protocol
    Calanzani, Natalia
    Weller, David
    Campbell, Christine
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (07):
  • [25] Study protocol for a systematic review of evidence for digital interventions for comorbid excessive drinking and depression in community-dwelling populations
    Schulte, Bernd
    Kaner, Eileen F. S.
    Beyer, Fiona
    Schmidt, Christiane S.
    O'Donnell, Amy
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (10):
  • [26] Key components in models of community-based interventions coordinating care in dementia: a mixed studies systematic review protocol
    Backhouse, Amy
    Dickens, Chris
    Richards, David
    McCabe, Rose
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, 4
  • [27] Mapping evidence on tuberculosis active case finding policies, strategies, and interventions for tuberculosis key populations: a systematic scoping review protocol
    Kuupiel, Desmond
    Bawontuo, Vitalis
    Mashamba-Thompson, Tivani P.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (1)
  • [28] Mapping evidence on tuberculosis active case finding policies, strategies, and interventions for tuberculosis key populations: a systematic scoping review protocol
    Desmond Kuupiel
    Vitalis Bawontuo
    Tivani P. Mashamba-Thompson
    Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [29] Organizational participatory research: a systematic mixed studies review exposing its extra benefits and the key factors associated with them
    Bush, Paula L.
    Pluye, Pierre
    Loignon, Christine
    Granikov, Vera
    Wright, Michael T.
    Pelletier, Jean-Francois
    Bartlett-Esquilant, Gillian
    Macaulay, Ann C.
    Haggerty, Jeannie
    Parry, Sharon
    Repchinsky, Carol
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
  • [30] Organizational participatory research: a systematic mixed studies review exposing its extra benefits and the key factors associated with them
    Paula L. Bush
    Pierre Pluye
    Christine Loignon
    Vera Granikov
    Michael T. Wright
    Jean-François Pelletier
    Gillian Bartlett-Esquilant
    Ann C. Macaulay
    Jeannie Haggerty
    Sharon Parry
    Carol Repchinsky
    Implementation Science, 12