The EU vs US corporate R&D intensity gap: investigating key sectors and firms

被引:6
|
作者
Moncada-Paterno-Castello, Pietro [1 ]
Grassano, Nicola [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr JRC, Growth & Innovat Directorate, Edf Expo,Calle Inca Garcilaso 3, Seville 41092, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; SIZE; HETEROGENEITY; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1093/icc/dtab043
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper presents a firm-level examination of the European Union (EU) vs US research and development (R&D) intensity differences based on four pictures taken during the time span 2005-2017. It contributes to the literature on the topic by inspecting for the first time which sectors and firms account the most for the aggregate R&D intensity performance of these two economies. Analyzing the top 1250 R&D investors worldwide in four different years, it finds that (i) only few companies within key (for their relative impact on the overall R&D intensity) high-tech sectors determine (positively and negatively) the bulk of the sector's intensity, (ii) the EU holds a much lower number of both larger and smaller R&D investors than the United States in the key high-tech sectors, and (iii) there is a high heterogeneity in firms' R&D intensity within such key sectors. These findings are crucial to better understand the aggregate transatlantic corporate R&D intensity gap.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 38
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Corporate R&D intensity decomposition: different data, different results?
    Moncada-Paterno-Castello, Pietro
    Amoroso, Sara
    Cincera, Michele
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2020, 47 (04) : 458 - 473
  • [42] New technology and corporate strategy: The international management of R&D by multinational firms
    Arai, S
    [J]. IEMC-2002: IEEE INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS: MANAGING TECHNOLOGY FOR THE NEW ECONOMY, 2002, : 14 - 19
  • [43] R&D, foreign ownership, and corporate groups: Evidence from Japanese firms
    Kwon, Hyeog Ug
    Park, Jungsoo
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2018, 47 (02) : 428 - 439
  • [44] Assessing the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and R&D Effectiveness of Firms
    Ochirova, Elena
    Miriakov, Mikhail
    Dranev, Yury
    Kamunin, Nikita
    [J]. GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2024,
  • [45] Firms' environmental R&D cooperation strategy with strategic corporate social responsibility
    Li, Dongdong
    Shang, Chenxuan
    Sun, Zhao-Yong
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2024, 36 (10) : 3128 - 3145
  • [46] Corporate tax, R&D and export decisions: Evidence from European firms
    Bournakis, Ioannis
    Romero-Jordan, Desiderio
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [47] Technology vs. terror - The TR corporate R&D scorecard
    不详
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, 2001, 104 (10): : 75 - +
  • [49] R&D and productivity in the US and the EU: Sectoral specificities and differences in the crisis
    Castellani, Davide
    Piva, Mariacristina
    Schubert, Torben
    Vivarelli, Marco
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 138 : 279 - 291
  • [50] How does R&D intensity influence firm explorativeness? Evidence of R&D active firms in four advanced countries
    Lee, Cheng-Yu
    Wu, Hsueh-Liang
    Pao, Huei-Wen
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2014, 34 (10) : 582 - 593