Corporate R&D intensity decomposition: different data, different results?

被引:3
|
作者
Moncada-Paterno-Castello, Pietro [1 ]
Amoroso, Sara [1 ]
Cincera, Michele [2 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr JRC, Growth & Innovat Directorate, Edificio Expo,Calle Inca Garcilaso 3, Seville 41092, Spain
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, iCite, Solvay Brussels Sch Econ & Management, Ave Franklin Roosevelt 42, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
corporate R&D intensity gap; decomposition; literature survey; R&D policy; methodological hints; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; TECHNICAL CHANGE; PRODUCTIVITY; EU; US; HETEROGENEITY; INDUSTRIES; TECHNOLOGY; EMPLOYMENT; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scaa026
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Research and Development (R&D) indicators are used to facilitate international comparisons and as targets for research and innovation policy. An example of such an indicator is R&D intensity. The decomposition of the aggregate corporate R&D intensity is able to explain the differences in R&D intensity between countries by determining whether is the result of firms' underinvestment in R&D or of the differences across sectors. Despite its importance, the literature of corporate R&D intensity decomposition has been developed only recently. This article reviews for the first time the different methodological frameworks of corporate R&D intensity decomposition and how they are used in practice, shedding light on why sometimes empirical results seem to be contradictory. It inspects how the use of different data sources and analytical methods affect R&D intensity decomposition results, and what the analytical and policy implications are. The article also provides methodological and analytical guidance to analysts and policymakers.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 473
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A mathematical model of interaction of the results of different R&D types
    V. M. Moskovkin
    N. E. Bilal Suleiman
    N. A. Golikov
    [J]. Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics, 2011, 45 (1) : 33 - 38
  • [2] A Mathematical Model of Interaction of the Results of Different R&D Types
    Moskovkin, V. M.
    Suleiman, N. E. Bilal
    Golikov, N. A.
    [J]. AUTOMATIC DOCUMENTATION AND MATHEMATICAL LINGUISTICS, 2011, 45 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [3] The Effect of R&D Intensity on Corporate Social Responsibility
    Robert C. Padgett
    Jose I. Galan
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 93 : 407 - 418
  • [4] The Effect of R&D Intensity on Corporate Social Responsibility
    Wei Huihui
    [J]. NEW THINKING FOR STRATEGY: GREEN, INNOVATION AND SHARING, 2017, : 490 - 495
  • [5] The Effect of R&D Intensity on Corporate Social Responsibility
    Padgett, Robert C.
    Galan, Jose I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 93 (03) : 407 - 418
  • [6] Corporate decision-making in R&D outsourcing and the impact on internal R&D employment intensity
    Teirlinck, Peter
    Dumont, Michel
    Spithoven, Andre
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2010, 19 (06) : 1741 - 1768
  • [7] Corporate governance mechanisms and R&D intensity in OECD courtiers
    AlHares, Aws
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2020, 20 (05): : 863 - 885
  • [8] Exploratory results on the importance of R&D knowledge domains in businesses with different strategies
    Langerak, F
    Nijssen, E
    Frambach, R
    Gupta, A
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 1999, 29 (03) : 209 - 217
  • [9] Untangling the Influence of Corporate Sustainability on Export Intensity: The Moderating Role of R&D Intensity
    Aksoy, Mine
    Yilmaz, Mustafa K.
    Golgeci, Ismail
    Tatoglu, Ekrem
    Canci, Metin
    Hizarci, Atike Elanur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MARKETING, 2024,
  • [10] Research collaboration and R&D outsourcing: Different R&D personnel requirements in SMEs
    Teirlinck, Peter
    Spithoven, Andre
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2013, 33 (4-5) : 142 - 153