Asymmetric diversification of mating pheromones in fission yeast

被引:16
|
作者
Seike, Taisuke [1 ,3 ]
Shimoda, Chikashi [2 ]
Niki, Hironori [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Genet, Genet Strains Res Ctr, Mishima, Shizuoka, Japan
[2] Osaka City Univ, Grad Sch Sci, Sumiyoshi Ku, Osaka, Japan
[3] RIKEN, Ctr Biosyst Dynam Res, Suita, Osaka, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES-POMBE; P-FACTOR; SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; GENE ENCODES; MECHANISMS; EVOLUTION; GENOMICS; RECEPTOR;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pbio.3000101
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In fungi, mating between partners depends on the molecular recognition of two peptidyl mating pheromones by their respective receptors. The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sp) has two mating types, Plus (P) and Minus (M). The mating pheromones P-factor and M-factor, secreted by P and M cells, are recognized by the receptors mating type auxiliary minus 2 (Mam2) and mating type auxiliary plus 3 (Map3), respectively. Our recent study demonstrated that a few mutations in both M-factor and Map3 can trigger reproductive isolation in S. pombe. Here, we explored the mechanism underlying reproductive isolation through genetic changes of pheromones/receptors in nature. We investigated the diversity of genes encoding the pheromones and their receptor in 150 wild S. pombe strains. Whereas the amino acid sequences of M-factor and Map3 were completely conserved, those of P-factor and Mam2 were very diverse. In addition, the P-factor gene contained varying numbers of tandem repeats of P-factor (4-8 repeats). By exploring the recognition specificity of pheromones between S. pombe and its close relative Schizosaccharomyces octosporus (So), we found that So-M-factor did not have an effect on S. pombe P cells, but So-P-factor had a partial effect on S. pombe M cells. Thus, recognition of M-factor seems to be stringent, whereas that of P-factor is relatively relaxed. We speculate that asymmetric diversification of the two pheromones might be facilitated by the distinctly different specificities of the two receptors. Our findings suggest that M-factor communication plays an important role in defining the species, whereas P-factor communication is able to undergo a certain degree of flexible adaptation-perhaps as a first step toward prezygotic isolation in S. pombe.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiple epigenetic events regulate mating-type switching of fission yeast
    Klar, AJS
    Ivanova, AV
    Dalgaard, JZ
    Bonaduce, MJ
    Grewal, SIS
    EPIGENETICS, 1998, 214 : 87 - 99
  • [42] The role of recombinational repair proteins in mating type switching in fission yeast cells
    D. A. Vagin
    F. K. Khasanov
    V. I. Bashkirov
    Russian Journal of Genetics, 2006, 42 : 385 - 391
  • [43] ORIENTATION OF PLUS GENES AT MATING-TYPE LOCUS IN HOMOTHALLIC FISSION YEAST
    EGEL, R
    MOLECULAR & GENERAL GENETICS, 1978, 161 (03): : 305 - 309
  • [44] LINEAGE-DEPENDENT MATING-TYPE TRANSPOSITION IN FISSION AND BUDDING YEAST
    KLAR, AJS
    CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 3 (05) : 745 - 751
  • [45] Mating type switching in fission yeast: A unique model system of development and differentiation
    Singh, J
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 1999, 77 (10): : 1262 - 1272
  • [46] The fission yeast Map4 protein is a novel adhesin required for mating
    Reza Sharifmoghadam, Mohammad
    Bustos-Sanmamed, Pilar
    Valdivieso, Maria-Henar
    FEBS LETTERS, 2006, 580 (18): : 4457 - 4462
  • [47] Expression-state boundaries in the mating-type region of fission yeast
    Thon, G
    Bjerling, P
    Bünner, CM
    Verhein-Hansen, J
    GENETICS, 2002, 161 (02) : 611 - 622
  • [48] Molecular signature of the imprintosome complex at the mating-type locus in fission yeast
    Raimondi, Celia
    Jagla, Bernd
    Proux, Caroline
    Waxin, Herve
    Gangloff, Serge
    Arcangioli, Benoit
    MICROBIAL CELL, 2018, 5 (04): : 169 - 183
  • [49] The role of recombinational repair proteins in mating type switching in fission yeast cells
    Vagin, D. A.
    Khasanov, F. K.
    Bashkirov, V. I.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2006, 42 (04) : 385 - 391