Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic women in Hungary -: An epidemiological and cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Nyári, T
Nyári, C
Woodward, M
Mészáros, G
Deák, J
Nagy, E
Kovács, L
机构
[1] Univ Szeged, Dept Med Informat, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary
[2] Univ Szeged, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Szeged, Hungary
[3] Univ Szeged, Dept Clin Microbiol, Szeged, Hungary
[4] Univ Sydney, Inst Int Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
C. trachomatis infection; cost-effectiveness analysis; preventive strategy; risk factors;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080004300.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background. A multicenter survey was carried out in order to determine the prevalence and risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the population of asymptomatic: women in Hungary. Results were used to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for chlamydial infection in women with asymptomatic genital infections. Methods. The non-amplified nucleic acid hybridization method (PACE 2 Gen-Probe) was used to diagnose C. trachomatis and Bayes' theorem was applied to assess the prevalence of the infection. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to differentiate the risk factors for chlamydial infections. Results. According to the test, the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis among 1300 pregnant women was 4.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of the test are estimated to be 70% and 99%. respectively. After Bayes' correction, the overall estimated prevalence of chlamydial infection was 5.1%. There were significant differences in proportions of chlamydial infection in different regions, and also in different age groups and different family status groups. The highest rate was for women aged below 20 years: 16.9%. Cost-effectiveness analysis, with associated sensitivity analysis was carried out for women aged below 20 years. Three screening strategies were compared: using the ELISA method, using amplified Gen-Probe method and no screening. The amplified Gen-Probe method was best provided, the infection prevalence exceeded 16.7%, the PID rate exceeded 24% and the probability of tubal infertility in untreated women exceeded 25%. Conclusion. We conclude that screening with amplified Gen-Probe assays (followed by treatment of positive patients) is the preferred screening strategy for young women in Hungary.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 306
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Doxycycline compared with azithromycin for treating women with genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections: An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis
    Magid, D
    Douglas, JM
    Schwartz, JS
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 124 (04) : 389 - +
  • [32] Women for Chlamydia trachomatis in family planning clinics - The cost-effectiveness of DNA amplification assays
    Howell, MR
    Quinn, TC
    Brathwaite, W
    Gaydos, CA
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 1998, 25 (02) : 108 - 117
  • [33] Overestimation of complication rates in evaluations of Chlamydia trachomatis screening programmes -: implications for cost-effectiveness analyses
    van Valkengoed, IGM
    Morré, SA
    van den Brule, AJC
    Meijer, CJLM
    Bouter, LM
    Boeke, AJP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 33 (02) : 416 - 425
  • [34] Systematic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis:: Estimating cost-effectiveness using dynamic modeling and Dutch data
    de Vries, R
    van Bergen, JEAM
    de Jong-van den Berg, LTW
    Postma, MJ
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [35] Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis:: a review of published studies
    Honey, E
    Augood, C
    Templeton, A
    Russell, I
    Paavonen, J
    Mårdh, PA
    Stary, A
    Stray-Pedersen, B
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2002, 78 (06) : 406 - 412
  • [36] Cost-effectiveness of oral cancer screening in Hungary
    Voko Zoltan
    Turi Gergo
    Zsolyom Adriana
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2016, 157 (29) : 1161 - 1170
  • [37] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SEROLOGY AND CELL-CULTURE FOR CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS IN LOW PREVALENCE WOMEN
    NETTLEMAN, M
    JONES, R
    ROBERTS, S
    DITTUS, R
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1986, 34 (02): : A527 - A527
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness of screening for asymptomatic carotid stenosis
    Yin, DP
    Carpenter, JP
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 27 (02) : 245 - 255
  • [39] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SCREENING COLONOSCOPY IN ASYMPTOMATIC INDIVIDUALS
    LIEBERMAN, D
    SMITH, F
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1990, 36 (02) : 209 - 210
  • [40] Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for chlamydia on admission to detention
    Blake, DR
    Gaydos, CA
    Quinn, TC
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2004, 31 (02) : 85 - 95