Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic women in Hungary -: An epidemiological and cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Nyári, T
Nyári, C
Woodward, M
Mészáros, G
Deák, J
Nagy, E
Kovács, L
机构
[1] Univ Szeged, Dept Med Informat, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary
[2] Univ Szeged, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Szeged, Hungary
[3] Univ Szeged, Dept Clin Microbiol, Szeged, Hungary
[4] Univ Sydney, Inst Int Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
C. trachomatis infection; cost-effectiveness analysis; preventive strategy; risk factors;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080004300.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background. A multicenter survey was carried out in order to determine the prevalence and risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the population of asymptomatic: women in Hungary. Results were used to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for chlamydial infection in women with asymptomatic genital infections. Methods. The non-amplified nucleic acid hybridization method (PACE 2 Gen-Probe) was used to diagnose C. trachomatis and Bayes' theorem was applied to assess the prevalence of the infection. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to differentiate the risk factors for chlamydial infections. Results. According to the test, the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis among 1300 pregnant women was 4.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of the test are estimated to be 70% and 99%. respectively. After Bayes' correction, the overall estimated prevalence of chlamydial infection was 5.1%. There were significant differences in proportions of chlamydial infection in different regions, and also in different age groups and different family status groups. The highest rate was for women aged below 20 years: 16.9%. Cost-effectiveness analysis, with associated sensitivity analysis was carried out for women aged below 20 years. Three screening strategies were compared: using the ELISA method, using amplified Gen-Probe method and no screening. The amplified Gen-Probe method was best provided, the infection prevalence exceeded 16.7%, the PID rate exceeded 24% and the probability of tubal infertility in untreated women exceeded 25%. Conclusion. We conclude that screening with amplified Gen-Probe assays (followed by treatment of positive patients) is the preferred screening strategy for young women in Hungary.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 306
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effectiveness of screening swab or urine specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis from young Canadian women in Ontario
    Goeree, R
    Jang, D
    Blackhouse, G
    Chong, S
    Mahony, J
    Sellors, J
    Foy, A
    Chernesky, M
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2001, 28 (12) : 701 - 709
  • [22] The impact of natural history parameters on the cost-effectiveness of Chlamydia trachomatis screening strategies
    Hu, Delphine
    Hook, Edward W., III
    Goldie, Sue J.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2006, 33 (07) : 428 - 436
  • [23] Screening asymptomatic women for Chlamydia trachomatis -: Abstract and commentary
    Handsfield, HH
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (20): : 1800 - 1801
  • [24] Universal Chlamydia Screening for Women With Threatened Preterm Labor: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Gimovsky, Alexis
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Werner, Erika
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 : 136S - 136S
  • [25] The Cost-Effectiveness of a Chlamydia Trachomatis Vaccination Program in Young Women in the United States
    Ditkowsky, Jared
    Rahman, Afsana
    Hammerschlag, Margaret
    Kohlhoff, Stephan
    Smith-Norowitz, Tamar A.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2017, 139 (02) : AB58 - AB58
  • [26] Cost effectiveness analysis of a population based screening programme for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women by means of home obtained urine specimens
    van Valkengoed, IGM
    Postma, MJ
    Morré, SA
    van den Brule, AJC
    Meijer, CJLM
    Bouter, LM
    Boeke, AJP
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2001, 77 (04) : 276 - 282
  • [27] Comparing cost effectiveness of screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis in systematic and opportunistic approaches
    Postma, MJ
    Welte, R
    van den Hoek, JAR
    Morré, SA
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2002, 78 (01) : 73 - 74
  • [28] Relative cost-effectiveness of different tests for Chlamydia trachomatis
    Jackson, B
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (04) : 308 - 308
  • [29] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PRENATAL TESTING FOR CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS
    NETTLEMAN, MD
    BELL, TA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 164 (05) : 1289 - 1294
  • [30] Cost-effectiveness of screening programs for Chlamydia trachomatis -: A population-based dynamic approach
    Welte, R
    Kretzschmar, M
    Leidl, R
    Van den Hoek, A
    Jager, JC
    Postma, MJ
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2000, 27 (09) : 518 - 529