Radiation dose and fluoroscopy time of conventional versus fluoroscopic computer assisted pedicle screw implantation

被引:17
|
作者
Linhardt, O
Perlick, L
Lüring, C
Stern, U
Plitz, W
Grifka, J
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Orthopad Klin, D-93074 Bad Abbach, Germany
[2] Univ Regensburg, Inst Rontgendiagnost Klinikum, D-93074 Bad Abbach, Germany
[3] Univ Munich, Labor Biomech & Expt Orthopad, Munich, Germany
来源
关键词
pedicle screws; computer-assisted surgery; fluoroscopy; radiacopy dose; fluoroscopy time;
D O I
10.1055/s-2005-836489
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: Goal of the current study was to compare radiation dose and fluoroscopy time of fluoroscopic computer assisted pedicle screw implantation versus the conventional technique. Method: For each of 10 specimens two pedicle screws were placed using conventional technique (group 1) and two screws were inserted with fluoroscopic navigation system (group 2) contralateraly. Results: For implantation of two pedicle screws the mean radiation dose was 0.041 mSv in group 1 and 0.029 mSv in group 2. Fluoroscopy time was 34 seconds in group 1 and 25 seconds in group 2. The differences of radiation dose and fluoroscopy time for group 1 and, 2 were statistically significant (radiation dose p = 0.00044, fluoroscopy time p = 0.00039). Conclusion: We achieved significantly lower radiation dose and fluoroscopy time with fluoroscopic computer assisted pedicle screw implantation compared with the conventional technique. Concerning exposure to radiation for patients and personnels fluoroscopic navigated screw insertion is to favour.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 178
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion -: Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery
    Slomczykowski, M
    Roberto, M
    Schneeberger, P
    Ozdoba, C
    Vock, P
    SPINE, 1999, 24 (10) : 975 - 982
  • [2] Radiation dose of fluoroscopic vs computer-assisted pedicle screw insertion
    Schaeren, S
    Roth, J
    Dick, W
    ORTHOPADE, 2002, 31 (04): : 392 - 396
  • [3] Pullout resistance of conventional pedicle screw implantation in comparison to fluoroscopic computer-assisted technique
    Linhardt, O.
    Perlick, L.
    Renkawitz, T.
    Matussek, J.
    Plitz, W.
    Grifka, J.
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2006, 131 (05): : 407 - 410
  • [4] Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion -: Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery -: Point of view
    Singer, KP
    SPINE, 1999, 24 (10) : 983 - 983
  • [5] Computer-assisted fluoroscopic targeting system for pedicle screw insertion
    Choi, WW
    Green, BA
    Levi, ADO
    NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 47 (04) : 872 - 878
  • [6] Clinical accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement: a retrospective comparative study of conventional versus computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement
    Ishikawa, Yoshimoto
    Kanemura, Tokumi
    Yoshida, Go
    Ito, Zenya
    Muramoto, Akio
    Ohno, Shuichiro
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 13 (05) : 606 - 611
  • [7] Computer-assisted fluoroscopic targeting system for pedicle screw insertion - Comment
    Traynelis, VC
    NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 47 (04) : 878 - 878
  • [8] Time Demand and Radiation Dose in 3D-Fluoroscopy-based Navigation-assisted 3D-Fluoroscopy-controlled Pedicle Screw Instrumentations
    Balling, Horst
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (09) : E512 - E519
  • [9] Clinical accuracy of fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screw fixation: A CT analysis
    Rampersaud, YR
    Pik, JHT
    Salonen, D
    Farooq, S
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (07) : E183 - E190
  • [10] Computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation of pedicle screw insertion - An in vivo feasibility study
    Fu, TS
    Chen, LH
    Wong, CB
    Lai, PL
    Tsai, TT
    Niu, CC
    Chen, WJ
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 75 (06): : 730 - 735