"What Is the Right Decision for Me?" Integrating Patient Perspectives Through Shared Decision-Making for Valvular Heart Disease Therapy

被引:19
|
作者
Lauck, Sandra B. [1 ,2 ]
Lewis, Krystina B. [3 ]
Borregaard, Britt [4 ]
de Sousa, Ismalia [2 ]
机构
[1] St Pauls Hosp, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sch Nursing, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Univ Ottawa Heart Inst, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Odense, Denmark
关键词
CITY CARDIOMYOPATHY QUESTIONNAIRE; AORTIC-VALVE IMPLANTATION; REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; FORM HEALTH SURVEY; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; INFORMED-CONSENT; QUALITY; CARE; STENOSIS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.cjca.2021.02.022
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Innovations in the treatment of valvular heart disease have transformed treatment options for people with valvular heart disease. In this rapidly evolving environment, the integration of patients' perspectives is essential to close the potential gap between what can be done and what patients want. Shared decision-making (SDM) and the measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are two strategies that are in keeping with this aim and gaining significant momentum in clinical practice, research, and health policy. SDM is a process that involves an individualised, intentional, and bidirectional exchange among patients, family, and health care providers that integrates patients' preferences, values, and priorities to reach a high-quality consensus treatment decision. SDM is widely endorsed by international valvular heart disease guidelines and increasingly integrated in health policy. Patient decision aids are evidence-based tools that facilitate SDM. The measurement of PROs-an umbrella term that refers to the standardised reporting of symptoms, health status, and other domains of health-related quality of life-provides unique data that come directly from patients to inform clinical practice and augment the reporting of quality of care. Sensitive and validated instruments are available to capture generic, dimensional, and disease-specific PROs in patients with valvular heart disease. The integration of PROs in clinical care presents significant opportunities to help guide treatment decision and monitor health status. The integration of patients' perspectives promotes the shift to patient-centred care and optimal outcomes, and contributes to transforming the way we care for patients with valvular heart disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1054 / 1063
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening
    Melzer, Anne C.
    Golden, Sara E.
    Ono, Sarah S.
    Datta, Santanu
    Crothers, Kristina
    Slatore, Christopher G.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (02) : 546 - 553
  • [22] Shared decision-making in advanced disease
    Garcia Martinez, Ma Aranzazu
    Vila Iglesias, Isabel
    Veiga Cando, Dolores
    GALICIA CLINICA, 2013, 74 (04): : 157 - 160
  • [23] Patient Perspectives on Dialogue and Shared Decision Making
    Dauer, Lawrence T.
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2019, 116 (02): : 212 - 213
  • [24] Informed decision-making in patients with valvular disease
    Alfieri, Ottavio
    NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 16 (02) : 81 - 82
  • [25] Informed decision-making in patients with valvular disease
    Ottavio Alfieri
    Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2019, 16 : 81 - 82
  • [26] What's in shared decision-making for the physician?
    Gulbrandsen, Pal
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2014, 97 (02) : 145 - 146
  • [27] Lessons in Integrating Shared Decision-Making Into Cancer Care
    Steffensen, Karina Dahl
    Vinter, Mette
    Cruger, Dorthe
    Dankl, Kathrina
    Coulter, Angela
    Stuart, Brad
    Berry, Leonard L.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2018, 14 (04) : 229 - +
  • [28] Patient participation for better shared decision-making
    Steinmeijer, L.
    Van Veenendaal, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 57 : S21 - S21
  • [29] Reciprocal acknowledgement and decision-making shared with the patient
    Costa-Alcaraz, A. M.
    Siurana-Aparisi, J. C.
    Almendro-Padilla, C.
    Garcia-Vicente, S.
    Ordovas-Casaurran, R.
    REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA, 2011, 211 (11): : 581 - 586
  • [30] Informed Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction
    Bot, Arjan G. J.
    Bossen, Jeroen K. J.
    Herndon, James H.
    Ruchelsman, David E.
    Ring, David
    Vranceanu, Ana-Maria
    PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2014, 55 (06) : 586 - 594