Informed Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction

Background: Evidence suggests that when patients have a role in medical decisions they are more satisfied with their health care. Objective: To assess predictors of patient satisfaction, ratings' of the provider's informed shared decision-making (ISDM), and disability among patients with orthopedic pain complaints. Research Design: A total of 130 patients with nontraumatic painful conditions of the upper extremity were enrolled Medical encounters were audio recorded and coded by 2 independent coders. Eight ISDM elements and a total ISDM score were evaluated. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to answer the study questions. Measures: Participants' completed the Princess Margaret Hospital Patient Satisfaction with their Doctor Questionnaire to measure satisfaction; the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 to measure depression; the Whiteley Index to assess heightened illness concerns; and the pain catastrophizing scale to assess coping strategies in response to pain. Results: Less health anxiety, female gender, the ISDM element Identify choice, and any specific diagnosis determined 22% of the variation in satisfaction. Less health anxiety and unemployed unable to work compared with full-time working status were associated with a better rating of shared decision-making on the ISDM. Catastrophic thinking, female gender, symptoms of depression, and any specific diagnosis were associated with greater disability. Catastrophic thinking and symptoms of depression were the greatest contributors to the variation in disability. Conclusions: Psychologic factors are the strongest determinants of patient action, ratings of shared decision-making on the ISDM, and upper-extremity disability. Health anxiety is the most important,factor in ratings of patient satisfaction and ISD M whereas depression and catastrophizing are salient predictors' of disability, Level of Evidence: Prognostic level 1.