Plastic Packaging, Food Supply, and Everyday Life Adopting a Social Practice Perspective in Social-Ecological Research

被引:13
|
作者
Sattlegger, Lukas [1 ]
Stiss, Immanuel [2 ]
Raschewski, Luca [2 ]
Reindl, Katharina [3 ]
机构
[1] ISOE Inst Social Ecol Res, Res Unit Energy & Climate Protect Everyday Life, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] ISOE, Res Unit Energy & Climate Protect Everyday Life, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Lund Univ, Int Inst Ind Environm Econ, Lund, Sweden
来源
NATURE + CULTURE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
everyday life; materiality; practice theory; provisioning systems; social ecology; CONSUMPTION; MATERIALITY; MANAGEMENT; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3167/nc.2020.150203
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article presents practice-theoretical conceptions of societal relations to nature as a fruitful alternative to common system approaches in social-ecological research. Via the example of plastic food packaging, two different practice-theoretical approaches to food supply are discussed regarding their suitability for relating the material properties of packaging to their everyday use by producers, retailers, and consumers: (1) the network approach (portraying food supply as a network of practices; these practices include material elements that interrelate with other elements like competence or meaning) and (2) the nexus approach (investigating the interrelation between social practices and material arrangements in which they take place). Depending on the given research interest, both perspectives have their pros and cons: the network approach is stronger in understanding the everyday use of technologies, while the nexus approach encourages the integration of infrastructures and environmental contexts that are not directly observable within the practice.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 172
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Supply network resilience capabilities: a social-ecological perspective
    Statsenko, Larissa
    Jayasinghe, Ruchini Senarath
    Soosay, Claudine
    SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 29 (01) : 1 - 26
  • [2] Social Innovation in the Social-Ecological Research
    Wilhelm, Ralph
    Schulz, Thomas
    GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2017, 26 (02): : 145 - 146
  • [3] A social-ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation
    Wittman, Hannah
    Chappell, Michael Jahi
    Abson, David James
    Kerr, Rachel Bezner
    Blesh, Jennifer
    Hanspach, Jan
    Perfecto, Ivette
    Fischer, Joern
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2017, 17 (05) : 1291 - 1301
  • [4] Adopting process-relational perspectives to tackle the challenges of social-ecological systems research
    Garcia, Maria Mancilla
    Hertz, Tilman
    Schluter, Maja
    Preiser, Rika
    Woermann, Minka
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2020, 25 (01):
  • [5] Current research on school-based bullying: A social-ecological perspective
    Espelage, Dorothy L.
    Rao, Mrinalini A.
    De la Rue, Lisa
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL DISTRESS AND THE HOMELESS, 2013, 22 (01) : 7 - 21
  • [6] Social-Ecological Resilience as Practice: A Household Perspective from Agua Blanca (Ecuador)
    Ruiz-Ballesteros, Esteban
    Ramos-Ballesteros, Paulino
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (20)
  • [7] Expanding the contribution of the social sciences to social-ecological resilience research
    Stone-Jovicich, Samantha
    Goldstein, Bruce E.
    Brown, Katrina
    Plummer, Ryan
    Olsson, Per
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (01):
  • [8] Building Resilience in Ecological Restoration Processes: A Social-Ecological Perspective
    Krievins, Katrina
    Plummer, Ryan
    Baird, Julia
    ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION, 2018, 36 (03) : 195 - 207
  • [9] Research on Sports Participation Among College Students in China: a Social-Ecological Perspective
    Wang, Xiaopeng
    Guo, Qi
    Samsudin, Shamsulariffin
    Abdullah, Borhannudin
    REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA DEL DEPORTE, 2024, 33 (02): : 1 - 13
  • [10] Social-ecological research in India - A 'Status' report
    Guha, R
    ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY, 1997, 32 (07) : 345 - 352