Maintaining dosimetric quality when switching to a Monte Carlo dose engine for head and neck volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning

被引:10
|
作者
Feygelman, Vladimir [1 ]
Latifi, Kujtim [1 ]
Bowers, Mark [1 ]
Greco, Kevin [1 ]
Moros, Eduardo G. [1 ]
Isacson, Max [2 ]
Angerud, Agnes [2 ]
Caudell, Jimmy [1 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] RaySearch Labs AB, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
关键词
head and neck planning; Monte Carlo treatment planning; treatment planning algorithm transition; CALCULATION ALGORITHM; STATISTICAL UNCERTAINTIES; RADIATION-THERAPY; BEAM THERAPY; TO-MEDIUM; RADIOTHERAPY; PHOTON; IMRT; VALIDATION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13572
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Head and neck cancers present challenges in radiation treatment planning due to the large number of critical structures near the target(s) and highly heterogeneous tissue composition. While Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations currently offer the most accurate approximation of dose deposition in tissue, the switch to MC presents challenges in preserving the parameters of care. The differences in dose-to-tissue were widely discussed in the literature, but mostly in the context of recalculating the existing plans rather than reoptimizing with the MC dose engine. Also, the target dose homogeneity received less attention. We adhere to strict dose homogeneity objectives in clinical practice. In this study, we started with 21 clinical volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans previously developed in Pinnacle treatment planning system. Those plans were recalculated "as is" with RayStation (RS) MC algorithm and then reoptimized in RS with both collapsed cone (CC) and MC algorithms. MC statistical uncertainty (0.3%) was selected carefully to balance the dose computation time (1-2 min) with the planning target volume (PTV) dose-volume histogram (DVH) shape approaching that of a "noise-free" calculation. When the hot spot in head and neck MC-based treatment planning is defined as dose to 0.03 cc, it is exceedingly difficult to limit it to 105% of the prescription dose, as we were used to with the CC algorithm. The average hot spot after optimization and calculation with RS MC was statistically significantly higher compared to Pinnacle and RS CC algorithms by 1.2 and 1.0 %, respectively. The 95% confidence interval (CI) observed in this study suggests that in most cases a hot spot of <= 107% is achievable. Compared to the 95% CI for the previous clinical plans recalculated with RS MC "as is" (upper limit 108%), in real terms this result is at least as good or better than the historic plans.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of photon energy on dose distribution in volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning for head and neck cancer
    Nguyen, Trang Hong Thi
    Takemura, Akihiro
    Ueda, Shinichi
    Noto, Kimiya
    Kojima, Hironori
    Isomura, Naoki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2021, 20 (03) : 316 - 320
  • [2] Impact of MLC leaf width on volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning for head and neck cancers
    Lafond, Caroline
    Chajon, Enrique
    Devillers, Anne
    Louvel, Guillaume
    Toublanc, Sandra
    Olivier, Mickael
    Simon, Antoine
    de Crevoisier, Renaud
    Manens, Jean-Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (06): : 40 - 52
  • [3] Predicting the complexity of head-and-neck volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using a radiation therapy planning quality assurance software
    Sasaki, Motoharu
    Nakaguchi, Yuji
    Kamomae, Takeshi
    Ueda, Shoji
    Endo, Yuto
    Sato, Daisuke
    Ikushima, Hitoshi
    [J]. REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2022, 27 (06) : 963 - 972
  • [4] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, coplanar volumetric-modulated arc, therapy, and noncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in, glioblastoma: A dosimetric comparison
    Hou, Yong
    Zhang, Yan
    Liu, Zhen
    Yv, Lili
    Liu, Kun
    Tian, Xiufang
    Lv, Yajuan
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 187
  • [5] Dosimetric impact of dental metallic crown on intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer
    Kamomae, Takeshi
    Itoh, Yoshiyuki
    Okudaira, Kuniyasu
    Nakaya, Takayoshi
    Tomida, Masashi
    Miyake, Yoshikazu
    Oguchi, Hiroshi
    Shiinoki, Takehiro
    Kawamura, Mariko
    Yamamoto, Noriyuki
    Naganawa, Shinji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (01): : 234 - 245
  • [6] Dosimetric Effect of Jaw Tracking in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy
    Thongsawad, Sangutid
    Khamfongkhruea, Chirasak
    Tannanonta, Chirapha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 43 (01) : 52 - 57
  • [7] Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy
    Gayen, Sanjib
    Kombathula, Harsha
    Manna, Sumanta
    Varshney, Sonal
    Pareek, Puneet
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 38 (02): : 138 - 147
  • [8] Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Dosimetric and Treatment Planning Comparison with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques
    Goswami, Brijesh
    Yadav, Suresh
    Jain, Rakesh Kumar
    Goswami, Pradeep
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (03)
  • [9] Dosimetric evaluation of helical tomotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a planning study for dose escalation
    Zhang, Fu-Li
    Lu, Na
    Jiang, Hua-Yong
    Chen, Dian-Dian
    Wang, Ya-Di
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (02) : 914 - 922
  • [10] Dosimetric comparison of tomotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for children with neuroblastoma
    Liu, Xia
    Liu, Zhikai
    Pang, Tingtian
    Dong, Tingting
    Qiu, Jie
    [J]. PEDIATRIC INVESTIGATION, 2020, 4 (03) : 186 - 191