Maintaining dosimetric quality when switching to a Monte Carlo dose engine for head and neck volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning

被引:10
|
作者
Feygelman, Vladimir [1 ]
Latifi, Kujtim [1 ]
Bowers, Mark [1 ]
Greco, Kevin [1 ]
Moros, Eduardo G. [1 ]
Isacson, Max [2 ]
Angerud, Agnes [2 ]
Caudell, Jimmy [1 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] RaySearch Labs AB, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
关键词
head and neck planning; Monte Carlo treatment planning; treatment planning algorithm transition; CALCULATION ALGORITHM; STATISTICAL UNCERTAINTIES; RADIATION-THERAPY; BEAM THERAPY; TO-MEDIUM; RADIOTHERAPY; PHOTON; IMRT; VALIDATION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13572
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Head and neck cancers present challenges in radiation treatment planning due to the large number of critical structures near the target(s) and highly heterogeneous tissue composition. While Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations currently offer the most accurate approximation of dose deposition in tissue, the switch to MC presents challenges in preserving the parameters of care. The differences in dose-to-tissue were widely discussed in the literature, but mostly in the context of recalculating the existing plans rather than reoptimizing with the MC dose engine. Also, the target dose homogeneity received less attention. We adhere to strict dose homogeneity objectives in clinical practice. In this study, we started with 21 clinical volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans previously developed in Pinnacle treatment planning system. Those plans were recalculated "as is" with RayStation (RS) MC algorithm and then reoptimized in RS with both collapsed cone (CC) and MC algorithms. MC statistical uncertainty (0.3%) was selected carefully to balance the dose computation time (1-2 min) with the planning target volume (PTV) dose-volume histogram (DVH) shape approaching that of a "noise-free" calculation. When the hot spot in head and neck MC-based treatment planning is defined as dose to 0.03 cc, it is exceedingly difficult to limit it to 105% of the prescription dose, as we were used to with the CC algorithm. The average hot spot after optimization and calculation with RS MC was statistically significantly higher compared to Pinnacle and RS CC algorithms by 1.2 and 1.0 %, respectively. The 95% confidence interval (CI) observed in this study suggests that in most cases a hot spot of <= 107% is achievable. Compared to the 95% CI for the previous clinical plans recalculated with RS MC "as is" (upper limit 108%), in real terms this result is at least as good or better than the historic plans.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Monte Carlo Dose Verification for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Multiple Brain Metastases
    Tominaga, H.
    Araki, F.
    Kanetake, N.
    Sakata, J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3546 - 3547
  • [32] Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Head & Neck Cancer
    Afghan, M. K. N.
    Cao, D.
    Mehta, V.
    Shepard, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06) : 2901 - +
  • [33] Verification of Mechanical and Dosimetric Accuracy for Head and Neck Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy With Jaw Tracking
    Okumura, T.
    Nakashima, T.
    Aita, M.
    Ochi, Y.
    Kawahara, D.
    Masuda, H.
    Hioki, K.
    Ohno, Y.
    Saito, A.
    Nagata, Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E638 - E638
  • [34] Dosimetric Impact of Statistical Uncertainty On Monte Carlo Dose Calculation in Monaco TPS Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Lung Cancer
    Mohandass, P.
    Khanna, D.
    Manigandan, D.
    Kumar, M.
    Puri, A.
    Bhalla, N.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2921 - 2921
  • [35] Treatment Planning for Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy: Model and Heuristic Algorithms
    Song, Jie
    Shi, Zhongshun
    Sun, Bofei
    Shi, Leyuan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 12 (01) : 116 - 126
  • [36] A class solution for volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning in postprostatectomy radiotherapy
    Forde, Elizabeth
    Bromley, Regina
    Kneebone, Andrew
    Eade, Thomas
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (03) : 261 - 265
  • [37] Analysis of prostate intensity- and volumetric-modulated arc radiation therapy planning quality with PlanIQTM
    Sasaki, Motoharu
    Nakaguuchi, Yuji
    Kamomae, Takeshi
    Tsuzuki, Akira
    Kobuchi, Satoshi
    Kuwahara, Kenmei
    Ueda, Shoji
    Endo, Yuto
    Ikushima, Hitoshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (04): : 132 - 142
  • [38] Automatic interactive optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning of head and neck cancer
    Tol, J.
    Dahele, M.
    Doornaert, P.
    Slotman, B. J.
    Verbakel, W. F. A. R.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S35 - S35
  • [39] An Automated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Optimization Solution for Head and Neck Treatment Planning
    Verbakel, W. F.
    Tol, J. P.
    Doornaert, P.
    Slotman, B. J.
    Dahele, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S938 - S939
  • [40] ON THE QUALITY OF ACUROSXB DOSE CALCULATION FOR VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC HEAD AND NECK TREATMENT PLANS
    Frauchiger, D.
    Manser, P.
    Bigler, R.
    Geretschlaeger, A.
    Aebersold, D. M.
    Fix, M. K.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 187 (08) : 517 - 517