Effect of abciximab on the outcome of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting after failed percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:0
|
作者
Singh, M
Nuttall, GA
Ballman, KV
Mullany, CJ
Berger, PB
Holmes, DR
Bell, MR
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Cardiovasc Dis & Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Cardiovasc Thorac Anesthesia, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Biostat Sect, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for failed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients who had received abciximab. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the records of patients who had PCI at our institution between January 1994 and December 1998 and identified those who had urgent or emergency CABG within 48 hours after PCI. CABG was performed for failed PCI in patients who had ongoing ischemia, hemodynamic compromise, or both. These patients were categorized into 2 groups depending on whether they had been given abciximab during PCI. We compared blood product transfusion requirements, bleeding complications, and frequency of in-hospital adverse events of the 2 groups. Results: Of 5636 patients who had PCI, 77 (1.4%) had urgent or emergency CABG within 48 hours, including 11 who were given abciximab (abciximab group) during PCI and 66 who were not given abciximab (no abciximab group). The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics. The mean SD time to surgery was 8.4 +/-8.0 hours (median, 6 hours) for the abciximab group vs 12.1 +/- 12.5 hours (median, 4 hours) for the no abciximab group. Major bleeding (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction criteria) occurred in 9 (90%) of 10 patients in the abciximab group vs 48 (77%) of 62 patients in the no abciximab group. The total volumes of intraoperative autotransfusion and transfusion of red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma tended to be higher for the abciximab group. Also, this group received a mean of 13.9 U of platelets vs 3.2 U for the no abciximab group (P < .001). However, no in-hospital deaths occurred among patients in the abciximab group, and adverse events were infrequent and comparable between the 2 groups. No difference was noted between the 2 groups in the frequency of surgical reexploration for bleeding. Conclusion: Transfusion requirements are higher for patients who undergo emergency or urgent CABG after having received abciximab during PCI. However, in-hospital adverse events are infrequent and comparable to those for patients who do not receive abciximab.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 788
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting to Treat Ischemic Cardiomyopathy?
    Velazquez, Eric J.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 5 (06) : 641 - 642
  • [42] Multivessel disease: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting
    Munir, Muhammad S.
    Delaughter, Craig
    Ahmed, Amany H.
    Lee, Vei-Vei
    Elayda, MacArthur A.
    Wilson, James M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (09) : 40B - 40B
  • [43] Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Diabetes
    Bianco, Valentino
    Kilic, Arman
    Mulukutla, Suresh R.
    Gleason, Thomas G.
    Kliner, Dustin
    Aranda-Michel, Edgar
    Brown, James A.
    Wang, Yisi
    Allen, Christopher C.
    Habertheuer, Andreas
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 33 (02) : 368 - 377
  • [44] Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ESRD
    Chang, Tara I.
    Shilane, David
    Kazi, Dhruv S.
    Montez-Rath, Maria E.
    Hlatky, Mark A.
    Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 23 (12): : 2042 - 2049
  • [45] Comparison of Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Kumar, Ratan
    Mal, Kheraj
    Razaq, Muhammad Khalid
    Magsi, Mansoor
    Memon, Muhammad Khizar
    Memon, Sidra
    Irfan, Sana
    Bansari, Kanwal
    Ali, Basma
    Rizwan, Amber
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [46] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting A Surgical Perspective
    Gaudino, Mario
    Taggart, David P.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 4 (06) : 505 - 506
  • [47] Neuropsychological outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting -: Results from the Stent or Surgery (SoS) Trial
    Währborg, P
    Booth, JE
    Clayton, T
    Nugara, F
    Pepper, J
    Weintraub, WS
    Sigwart, U
    Stables, RH
    CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (22) : 3411 - 3417
  • [48] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Stenting versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Stable Coronary Artery Disease
    Glenn, Ian C.
    Iacona, Gabriele M.
    Mangi, Abeel A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANGIOLOGY, 2021, 30 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [49] Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Diabetics: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?
    Disney, Logan
    Ramaiah, Chandrashekhar
    Ramaiah, Meghna
    Keshavamurthy, Suresh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANGIOLOGY, 2021, 30 (03) : 194 - 201
  • [50] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for the Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
    Cho, Sang-Cheol
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Park, Seung-Jung
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2019, 49 (05) : 369 - 383