Effect of abciximab on the outcome of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting after failed percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:0
|
作者
Singh, M
Nuttall, GA
Ballman, KV
Mullany, CJ
Berger, PB
Holmes, DR
Bell, MR
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Cardiovasc Dis & Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Cardiovasc Thorac Anesthesia, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Biostat Sect, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for failed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients who had received abciximab. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the records of patients who had PCI at our institution between January 1994 and December 1998 and identified those who had urgent or emergency CABG within 48 hours after PCI. CABG was performed for failed PCI in patients who had ongoing ischemia, hemodynamic compromise, or both. These patients were categorized into 2 groups depending on whether they had been given abciximab during PCI. We compared blood product transfusion requirements, bleeding complications, and frequency of in-hospital adverse events of the 2 groups. Results: Of 5636 patients who had PCI, 77 (1.4%) had urgent or emergency CABG within 48 hours, including 11 who were given abciximab (abciximab group) during PCI and 66 who were not given abciximab (no abciximab group). The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics. The mean SD time to surgery was 8.4 +/-8.0 hours (median, 6 hours) for the abciximab group vs 12.1 +/- 12.5 hours (median, 4 hours) for the no abciximab group. Major bleeding (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction criteria) occurred in 9 (90%) of 10 patients in the abciximab group vs 48 (77%) of 62 patients in the no abciximab group. The total volumes of intraoperative autotransfusion and transfusion of red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma tended to be higher for the abciximab group. Also, this group received a mean of 13.9 U of platelets vs 3.2 U for the no abciximab group (P < .001). However, no in-hospital deaths occurred among patients in the abciximab group, and adverse events were infrequent and comparable between the 2 groups. No difference was noted between the 2 groups in the frequency of surgical reexploration for bleeding. Conclusion: Transfusion requirements are higher for patients who undergo emergency or urgent CABG after having received abciximab during PCI. However, in-hospital adverse events are infrequent and comparable to those for patients who do not receive abciximab.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 788
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Coronary artery bypass grafting after failed percutaneous angioplasty compared to direct coronary bypass grafting in patients with unstable angina
    Bartram, U
    Wahlers, T
    Aebert, H
    Muegge, H
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 1996, 44 (01): : 31 - 34
  • [22] Coronary revascularization in octogenarians, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting
    Saito, N
    Yokomatsu, T
    Nobuyoshi, M
    Kimura, T
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 414 - 414
  • [23] Predictors of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting in percutaneous coronary interventions
    Seshadri, N
    Acharya, N
    Houghtaling, P
    Blackstone, E
    Ellis, SG
    Whitlow, PL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (05) : 334A - 335A
  • [24] Coronary Artery Bypass With Multiarterial Grafting vs Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Bianco, Valentino
    Mulukutla, Suresh
    Aranda-Michel, Edgar
    Chu, Danny
    Kaczorowski, David
    Bonatti, Johannes
    Yoon, Pyongsoo
    Kliner, Dustin
    Toma, Catalin
    Wang, Yisi
    Koscumb, Steve
    Thoma, Floyd
    Navid, Forozan
    Serna-Gallegos, Derek
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 115 (02): : 404 - 410
  • [25] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in CKD
    Berger, Alan K.
    Herzog, Charles A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2010, 55 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [26] Differences in outcome between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary bypass grafting
    Joseph S. Alpert
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2001, 3 (3) : 173 - 174
  • [27] Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting on outcome after nonfatal cardiac arrest outside the hospital
    van der Burg, AEB
    Bax, JJ
    Boersma, E
    Bootsma, M
    van Erven, L
    van der Wall, EE
    Schalij, MJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 91 (07): : 785 - 789
  • [28] Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease
    Weirick T.
    Anderson H.V.
    Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 2009, 3 (5) : 309 - 310
  • [29] Stroke After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Pathogenesis, and Outcomes
    Gaudino, Mario
    Angiolillo, Dominick J.
    Di Franco, Antonino
    Capodanno, Davide
    Bakaeen, Faisal
    Farkouh, Michael E.
    Fremes, Stephen E.
    Holmes, David
    Girardi, Leonard N.
    Nakamura, Sunao
    Head, Stuart J.
    Park, Seung-Jung
    Mack, Michael
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Ruel, Marc
    Stone, Gregg W.
    Tam, Derrick Y.
    Vallely, Michael
    Taggart, David P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2019, 8 (13):
  • [30] Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting after failed coronary angioplasty: What has changed in a decade?
    Reinecke, H
    Fetsch, T
    Roeder, N
    Schmid, C
    Winter, A
    Ribbing, M
    Berendes, E
    Block, M
    Scheld, HH
    Breithardt, G
    Kerber, S
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 70 (06): : 1997 - 2003