Feasibility and acceptability of the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the delivery of nurse-led supportive care to people with colorectal cancer

被引:30
|
作者
Kotronoulas, Grigorios [1 ]
Papadopoulou, Constantina [2 ]
MacNicol, Lorna [3 ]
Simpson, Mhairi [3 ]
Maguire, Roma [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Livingstone Wer LT14-11,26 Richmond St, Glasgow G1 1XH, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ West Scotland, Sch Hlth Nursing & Midwifery, Paisley, Renfrew, Scotland
[3] NHS Lanarkshire, Wishaw Gen Hosp, Bothwell, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; Unmet needs; Supportive care; Colorectal cancer; Cancer nurse specialist; Feasibility; Acceptability; Nurse led; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; UNMET NEEDS; SURVIVORS; INTERVENTION; PREFERENCES; VALIDATION; DISTRESS; CONNECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Logistical issues pertinent to the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by colorectal cancer nurse specialists (CNS) to identify the needs of people with colorectal cancer (CRC) in acute care remain unknown. We explored the feasibility and acceptability of PROMs-driven, CNS-led consultations to enhance delivery of supportive care to people with CRC completing adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: A systematic literature review and focus groups with patients and CNS (Phase 1) were followed by a repeated-measures, exploratory study (Phase 2), whereby pre-consultation PROM data were collected during three consecutive, monthly consultations, and used by the CNS to enable delivery of personalised supportive care. Results: Based on Phase 1 data, the Supportive Care Needs Survey was selected for use in Phase 2. Fourteen patients were recruited (recruitment rate: 56%); thirteen (93%) completed all study assessments. Forty in-clinic patient-clinician consultations took place. At baseline, 219 unmet needs were reported in total, with a notable 21% (T2) and 32% (T3) over-time reduction. Physical/daily living and psychological domain scores declined from T1 to T3, yet not statistically significantly. In exit interviews, patients described how using the PROM helped them shortlist and prioritise their needs. CNS stressed how the PROM helped them tease out more issues with patients than they would normally. Conclusions: Nurse-led, PROMs-driven needs assessments with patients with CRC appear to be feasible and acceptable in clinical practice, possibly associated with a sizeable reduction in the frequency of unmet needs, and smaller decreases in physical/daily living and psychosocial needs in the immediate post-chemotherapy period. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 124
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Achieving patient priorities: an alternative to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for promoting patient-centred care
    Naik, Aanand D.
    Catic, Angela
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2021, 30 (02) : 92 - 95
  • [42] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) use in post-stroke patient care and clinical practice: a realist synthesis protocol
    A. Smith
    J. Hewitt
    T. J. Quinn
    M. Robling
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [43] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) use in post-stroke patient care and clinical practice: a realist synthesis protocol
    Smith, A.
    Hewitt, J.
    Quinn, T. J.
    Robling, M.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [44] Feasibility and utilization of electronic patient-reported outcome measures for lung cancer in routine clinical care
    Basch, Ethan
    Lin, Huamao Mark
    Cala, Mary Lynn
    Styliadou, Melpomeni
    Galaznik, Aaron
    Wujcik, Debra
    Rusli, Emelly
    Coombs, Nicholas C.
    Beamon, Emily R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [45] Digitally enabled patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care
    Lindner, Oana C.
    Velikova, Galina
    Stark, Dan P.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (01): : E2 - E2
  • [46] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Hematology Cancer Care
    Kirkpatrick, Suriya
    Campbell, Karen
    Harding, Samantha
    Rudd, Sarah
    CANCER NURSING, 2024,
  • [47] A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
    S. Ishaque
    J. Karnon
    G. Chen
    R. Nair
    A. B. Salter
    Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28 : 567 - 592
  • [48] A Systematic Review of the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Adults Undergoing Liver Transplantation
    van Knippenberg, Samira
    Powell-Brett, Sarah
    Joshi, Kunal
    Calvert, Melanie
    Turner, Grace
    Aiyegbusi, Lee O.
    Weeda, Viola B.
    Hartog, Hermien
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 106 (09) : S658 - S658
  • [49] A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
    Ishaque, S.
    Karnon, J.
    Chen, G.
    Nair, R.
    Salter, A. B.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (03) : 567 - 592
  • [50] Acceptability of Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures for Hepatitis C Treatment Among People Who Use Drugs
    Annie Madden
    Max Hopwood
    Joanne Neale
    Carla Treloar
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2019, 12 : 259 - 265