Feasibility and acceptability of the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the delivery of nurse-led supportive care to people with colorectal cancer

被引:30
|
作者
Kotronoulas, Grigorios [1 ]
Papadopoulou, Constantina [2 ]
MacNicol, Lorna [3 ]
Simpson, Mhairi [3 ]
Maguire, Roma [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Livingstone Wer LT14-11,26 Richmond St, Glasgow G1 1XH, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ West Scotland, Sch Hlth Nursing & Midwifery, Paisley, Renfrew, Scotland
[3] NHS Lanarkshire, Wishaw Gen Hosp, Bothwell, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; Unmet needs; Supportive care; Colorectal cancer; Cancer nurse specialist; Feasibility; Acceptability; Nurse led; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; UNMET NEEDS; SURVIVORS; INTERVENTION; PREFERENCES; VALIDATION; DISTRESS; CONNECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Logistical issues pertinent to the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by colorectal cancer nurse specialists (CNS) to identify the needs of people with colorectal cancer (CRC) in acute care remain unknown. We explored the feasibility and acceptability of PROMs-driven, CNS-led consultations to enhance delivery of supportive care to people with CRC completing adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: A systematic literature review and focus groups with patients and CNS (Phase 1) were followed by a repeated-measures, exploratory study (Phase 2), whereby pre-consultation PROM data were collected during three consecutive, monthly consultations, and used by the CNS to enable delivery of personalised supportive care. Results: Based on Phase 1 data, the Supportive Care Needs Survey was selected for use in Phase 2. Fourteen patients were recruited (recruitment rate: 56%); thirteen (93%) completed all study assessments. Forty in-clinic patient-clinician consultations took place. At baseline, 219 unmet needs were reported in total, with a notable 21% (T2) and 32% (T3) over-time reduction. Physical/daily living and psychological domain scores declined from T1 to T3, yet not statistically significantly. In exit interviews, patients described how using the PROM helped them shortlist and prioritise their needs. CNS stressed how the PROM helped them tease out more issues with patients than they would normally. Conclusions: Nurse-led, PROMs-driven needs assessments with patients with CRC appear to be feasible and acceptable in clinical practice, possibly associated with a sizeable reduction in the frequency of unmet needs, and smaller decreases in physical/daily living and psychosocial needs in the immediate post-chemotherapy period. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 124
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Acceptability and accuracy of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for surveillance of breathlessness in routine lung cancer care: A mixed-method study
    Sung, Ji Hyun
    Brown, M. Catherine
    Perez-Cosio, Andrea
    Pratt, Laura
    Houad, Jacy
    Liang, Mindy
    Gill, Gursharan
    Moradian, Saeed
    Liu, Geoffrey
    Howell, Doris
    LUNG CANCER, 2020, 147 : 1 - 11
  • [22] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and fragility hip fracture: a systematic review of quality and acceptability
    Haywood, Kirstie L.
    Brett, Jo
    Tutton, Liz
    Stanisewska, Sophie
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 22
  • [23] Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia
    Alshehri, Fayez
    Alarabi, Abdulaziz
    Alharthi, Mohammed
    Alanazi, Thamer
    Alohali, Ahmed
    Alsaleem, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [24] Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia
    Fayez Alshehri
    Abdulaziz Alarabi
    Mohammed Alharthi
    Thamer Alanazi
    Ahmed Alohali
    Mohammad Alsaleem
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [25] Gender perspective in the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in rare diseases
    Perez, Sara
    Funes, Silvina
    Leyra, Begona
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (SUPPL 1) : 5 - 5
  • [26] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of lung cancer: A systematic review
    Ben Bouazza, Youssef
    Chiairi, Ibrahim
    El Kharbouchi, Ouiam
    De Backer, Lesley
    Vanhoutte, Greetje
    Janssens, Annelies
    Van Meerbeeck, Jan P.
    LUNG CANCER, 2017, 113 : 140 - 151
  • [27] Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) for the Delivery of Supportive Care to People With Lung Cancer - Identification and Selection of Existent Tools
    Kotronoulas, G.
    Papadopoulou, C.
    Simpson, M.
    Maguire, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S317 - S318
  • [28] Patient outcomes, patient experiences and process indicators associated with the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cancer care: a systematic review
    Caitlin Graupner
    Merel L. Kimman
    Suzanne Mul
    Annerika H. M. Slok
    Danny Claessens
    Jos Kleijnen
    Carmen D. Dirksen
    Stéphanie O. Breukink
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021, 29 : 573 - 593
  • [29] Patient outcomes, patient experiences and process indicators associated with the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cancer care: a systematic review
    Graupner, Caitlin
    Kimman, Merel L.
    Mul, Suzanne
    Slok, Annerika H. M.
    Claessens, Danny
    Kleijnen, Jos
    Dirksen, Carmen D.
    Breukink, Stephanie O.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (02) : 573 - 593
  • [30] The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) For People with the Four Most Common Cancers in the UK: A Structured Review
    Hadi, Monica
    Casanas i Comabella, Carolina
    Gibbons, Elizabeth
    Mackintosh, Anne
    Fitzpatrick, Ray
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 92 - 93