Single and Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Based on Hunger Games Search with Pareto Concept Optimization

被引:16
|
作者
Al-Kaabi, Murtadha [1 ]
Dumbrava, Virgil [1 ]
Eremia, Mircea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politehn Bucuresti, Fac Energy, Dept Power Syst, Bucharest 060029, Romania
关键词
multi-objective optimal power flow (MOOPF); hunger games search (HGS); multi-objective hunger games search (MOHGS); Pareto concept; fuzzy set theory; fuel cost; active power losses; emission; voltage deviation; voltage stability index; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; BEE COLONY ALGORITHM; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION ALGORITHM; LEARNING-BASED OPTIMIZATION; COST; EMISSION; SOLVE;
D O I
10.3390/en15228328
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this study, a new meta-heuristic optimization method inspired by the behavioral choices of animals and hunger-driven activities, called hunger games search (HGS), is suggested to solve and formulate the single- and multi-objective optimal power flow problem in power systems. The main aim of this study is to optimize the objective functions, which are total fuel cost of generator, active power losses in transmission lines, total emission issued by fossil-fueled thermal units, voltage deviation at PQ bus, and voltage stability index. The proposed HGS approach is optimal and easy, avoids stagnation in local optima, and can solve multi-constrained objectives. Various single-and multi-objective (conflicting) functions were proposed simultaneously to solve OPF problems. The proposed algorithm (HGS) was developed to solve the multi-objective function, called the multi-objective hunger game search (MOHGS), by incorporating the proposed optimization (HGS) with Pareto optimization. The fuzzy membership theory is the function responsible to extract the best compromise solution from non-dominated solutions. The crowding distance is the strategies carried out to determine and ordering the Pareto non-dominated set. Two standard tests (IEEE 30 bus and IEEE 57 bus systems) are the power systems that were applied to investigate the performance of the proposed approaches (HGS and MOHGS) for solving single and multiple objective functions with 25 studied cases using MATLAB software. The numerical results obtained by the proposed approaches (HGS and MOHGS) were compared to other optimization algorithms in the literature. The numerical results confirmed the efficiency and superiority of the proposed approaches by achieving an optimal solution and giving the faster convergence characteristics in single objective functions and extracting the best compromise solution and well-distributed Pareto front solutions in multi-objective functions.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Strength Pareto Gravitational Search Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization Problems
    Yuan, Xiaohui
    Chen, Zhihuan
    Yuan, Yanbin
    Huang, Yuehua
    Zhang, Xiaopan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2015, 29 (06)
  • [32] A Multi-Objective Topology Optimization Methodology Based on Pareto Optimal Min-Cut
    Xia, Meng
    Zhou, Qiang
    Sykulski, Jan
    Yang, Shiyou
    Ma, Yanhong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2020, 56 (03)
  • [33] Solution of multi-objective optimal power flow using gravitational search algorithm
    Bhattacharya, A.
    Roy, P. K.
    IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2012, 6 (08) : 751 - 763
  • [34] Differential search algorithm for solving multi-objective optimal power flow problem
    Abaci, Kadir
    Yamacli, Volkan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 79 : 1 - 10
  • [35] Multi-Objective Optimization Design of Vehicle Transmission System Based on Pareto Optimal Theory
    Fan Qin-man
    ICICTA: 2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATION, VOL III, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 198 - 201
  • [36] Multi-objective optimal power flow problem using constrained dynamic multitasking multi-objective optimization algorithm
    Zhu, Junhua
    Yu, Xiaobing
    Wang, Feng
    Mao, Yaqi
    SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2025, 93
  • [37] Multi-objective particle swarm optimization with comparison scheme and new pareto-optimal search strategy
    Wang Wen
    Shen Wei
    Ying Chao-long
    Yang Xin-yi
    FRONTIERS OF MANUFACTURING AND DESIGN SCIENCE IV, PTS 1-5, 2014, 496-500 : 1895 - +
  • [38] Searching for robust Pareto-optimal solutions in multi-objective optimization
    Deb, K
    Gupta, H
    EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-CRITERION OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 3410 : 150 - 164
  • [39] A Pareto-optimal genetic algorithm for warehouse multi-objective optimization
    Poulos, PN
    Rigatos, GG
    Tzafestas, SG
    Koukos, AK
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2001, 14 (06) : 737 - 749
  • [40] Robust Multi-Objective Optimization using Conditional Pareto Optimal Dominance
    Mirjalili, Seyedeh Zahra
    Chalup, Stephan
    Mirjalili, Seyedali
    Noman, Nasimul
    2020 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2020,