Palliative radiotherapy for thoracic spine metastases: Dosimetric advantage of three-dimensional conformal plans

被引:6
|
作者
Yeo, Seung-Gu [1 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Soonchunhyang Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coll Med, Cheonan 330721, South Korea
关键词
spine; metastases; palliation; three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy; dosimetry; BONE METASTASES; BREAST-CANCER; HEART-DISEASE; LUNG-CANCER; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.3892/ol.2015.3205
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to investigate the dosimetric advantages of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) for thoracic spine metastases and compare it with conventional two-dimensional (2D) plans. Radiation therapy (RT) planning data of 10 patients with mid-to-low thoracic spine metastases were analyzed. Computed tomography simulation was performed and the planning target volume (PTV), heart, esophagus, lung and spinal cord were contoured. The 3DCRT plan comprised one posteroanterior (PA) field and two posterior oblique fields. The 2D plans used a single PA field or opposed anteroposterior (AP)/PA fields. The prescription dose of radiation was 30 Gy in 10 fractions. All comparisons of the maximum or mean doses to the organs at risk or the PTV, between two of the three RT plans, demonstrated statistically significant differences (P<0.05), with the exception of the mean esophageal doses between the single PA vs. AP/PA (P=0.285) plans. The mean heart doses were 15.0 +/- 3.1 Gy in single PA, 17.3 +/- 4.3 Gy in AP/PA and 8.5 +/- 1.7 Gy using 3DCRT. The median reduction rates using 3DCRT were 38.9% compared with single PA (range, 29.4-58.5%) or 47.5% relative to AP/PA (range, 34.5-67.1%). The mean esophageal doses were 17.9 +/- 2.3 Gy in single PA, 18.2 +/- 2.2 Gy in AP/PA and 15.3 +/- 1.9 Gy in 3DCRT. The median reduction rate using 3DCRT was 12.8% compared with single PA or 15.6% relative to AP/PA. Compared with the single PA or AP/PA 2D plan, 3DCRT reduced the median dose by 13.7 or 1.9% of the maximum spinal cord dose, respectively, and 14.7 or 2.9% of the maximum PTV dose, respectively. The mean lung doses were 2.7 +/- 0.7 Gy in single PA, 2.6 +/- 0.7 Gy in AP/PA and 5.1 +/- 1.0 Gy in 3DCRT. In conclusion, 3DCRT for mid-to-low thoracic spine metastases demonstrated significant dosimetric advantages by reducing the unnecessary irradiation of critical organs, particularly the heart, and by achieving a homogeneous target dose.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 501
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Survival advantage for prostate cancer patients treated with high-dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy
    Hanks, GE
    Hanlon, AL
    Pinover, WH
    Horwitz, EM
    Schultheiss, TE
    CANCER JOURNAL, 1999, 5 (03): : 152 - 158
  • [32] Comparison of treatment plans using intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for paranasal sinus carcinoma
    Huang, D
    Xia, P
    Akazawa, P
    Akazawa, C
    Quivey, JM
    Verhey, LJ
    Kaplan, M
    Lee, N
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (01): : 158 - 168
  • [33] Intensity-modulated three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy
    Mohan, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (02): : 121 - 121
  • [34] Dosimetric Evaluation of Three-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy, RapidArc, and Hybrid RapidArc Radiotherapy Techniques for Left-sided Breast Cancer
    Mishra, Atul
    Yadav, Neha
    Sharma, Madhu
    Mittal, Kailash Kumar
    Mishra, Surendra Prasad
    Verma, Teerth Raj
    Tiwari, Shilpa
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025, 50 (01) : 93 - 99
  • [35] Comparsion of Tomotherapy,Volumetric Arc Therapy and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy Planning Techniques with Dosimetric Parameters in Pediatric Craniospinal Radiotherapy
    Pepele, Eda Kaya
    Dirican, Bahar
    Temelli, Oztun
    UHOD-ULUSLARARASI HEMATOLOJI-ONKOLOJI DERGISI, 2023, 33 (01): : 45 - 53
  • [36] Dosimetric analysis of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for chest wall irradiation in breast cancer patients
    Kausar, Mehlam
    Gurjar, Om Prakash
    Bagdare, Priyusha
    Gupta, Krishna Lal
    Bhandari, Virendra
    Naik, Ayush
    Nag, Pulkit
    Kancherla, Jeetendra
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2016, 15 (01) : 30 - 37
  • [37] Dosimetric effect of Elekta Beam Modulator micromultileaf in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Carosi, Alessandra
    Ingrosso, Gianluca
    Ponti, Elisabetta
    Tolu, Barbara
    Murgia, Alessandra
    di Cristino, Daniela
    Santoni, Riccardo
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (02) : 180 - 184
  • [38] Verification of Monitor Unit Calculations for Breast Field-In-Field Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy Plans
    Kosztyla, Robert
    Pierce, Greg
    Ploquin, Nicolas
    Roumeliotis, Michael
    Schinkel, Colleen
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (08) : 4940 - 4941
  • [39] Pain after Palliative Radiotherapy for Spine Metastases
    Zaikova, O.
    Fossa, S. D.
    Kongsgaard, U.
    Kvaloy, S.
    Giercksky, K-E
    Skjeldal, S.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 22 (10) : 828 - 836
  • [40] Dosimetric comparison of three dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy in high grade gliomas
    Sarkar, Biplab
    Goswami, Jyotirup
    Basu, Ayan
    Sriramprasath, S.
    POLISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2011, 17 (02) : 75 - 84