Using in situ hyperspectral reflectance data to distinguish nine aquatic plant species

被引:6
|
作者
Everitt, J. H. [1 ]
Yang, C. [1 ]
Summy, K. R. [2 ]
Owens, C. S. [3 ]
Glomski, L. M. [3 ]
Smart, R. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Weslaco, TX 78596 USA
[2] Univ Texas Pan Amer, Dept Biol, Edinburg, TX 78539 USA
[3] USA, Lewisville Aquat Ecosyst Res Facil, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Lewisville, TX 75057 USA
关键词
hyperspectral reflectance; spectral signature; multiple comparison range test; stepwise discriminant analysis; Eichhornia crassipes; Nelumbo lutea; Nuphar lutea; Nymphaea mexicana; Nymphaea odorata; Pistia stratiotes; Potamogeton nodusus; Salvinia molesta; Spirodela polyrrhiza;
D O I
10.1080/10106049.2011.591944
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In situ hyperspectral reflectance data were studied at 50 bands (10 nm bandwidth) over the 400-900 nm spectral range to determine their potential for distinguishing among nine aquatic plant species: American lotus [Nelumbo lutea (Willd.) Pers.], American pondweed (Potamogeton nodusus Poir.), giant duckweed [Spirodela polyrrhiza (L.) Schleid.], Mexican waterlily (Nymphaea mexicana Zucc.), white waterlily (Nymphaea odorata Aiton), spatterdock [Nuphar lutea (L.) Sm.], giant salvinia (Salvinia molesta Mitchell), waterhyacinth [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms] and waterlettuce (Pistia stratiotes L.). The species were studied on three dates: 30 May, 1 July and 3 August 2009. All nine species were studied in July and August, while only eight species were studied in May; giant duckweed was not studied in May due to insufficient availability. Two procedures were used to determine the optimum bands for discriminating among species: multiple comparison range tests and stepwise discriminant analysis. Multiple comparison range tests results for May showed that most separations among species occurred at bands 795-865 nm in the near-infrared (NIR) spectral region where up to six species could be distinguished. For July, few species could be distinguished among the 50 bands; most separations occurred at the 715 nm red-NIR edge band where four species could be differentiated. The optimum bands in August occurred in the green (525-595 nm), red (605-635 nm) and red-NIR edge (695-705 nm) spectral regions where up to six species could be distinguished. Stepwise discriminant analysis identified 11 bands in the blue, green, red-NIR edge and NIR spectral regions to be significant to discriminate among the eight species in May. For July and August, stepwise discriminant analysis identified 15 bands and 13 bands, respectively, from the blue to NIR regions to be significant for discriminating among the nine species.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 473
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MLR-based feature splitting regression for estimating plant traits using high-dimensional hyperspectral reflectance data
    Fei, Shuaipeng
    Xu, Demin
    Chen, Zhen
    Xiao, Yonggui
    Ma, Yuntao
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2023, 293
  • [42] Bayesian modelling of phosphorus content in wheat grain using hyperspectral reflectance data
    Rosa Angela Pacheco-Gil
    Ciro Velasco-Cruz
    Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez
    Juan Burgueño
    Sergio Pérez-Elizalde
    Francelino Rodrigues
    Ivan Ortiz-Monasterio
    David Hebert del Valle-Paniagua
    Fernando Toledo
    Plant Methods, 19
  • [43] Bayesian modelling of phosphorus content in wheat grain using hyperspectral reflectance data
    Pacheco-Gil, Rosa Angela
    Velasco-Cruz, Ciro
    Perez-Rodriguez, Paulino
    Burgueno, Juan
    Perez-Elizalde, Sergio
    Rodrigues, Francelino
    Ortiz-Monasterio, Ivan
    del Valle-Paniagua, David Hebert
    Toledo, Fernando
    PLANT METHODS, 2023, 19 (01)
  • [44] Use of field reflectance data for crop mapping using airborne hyperspectral image
    Nidamanuri, Rama Rao
    Zbell, Bernd
    ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 66 (05) : 683 - 691
  • [45] Predicting grain yield using canopy hyperspectral reflectance in wheat breeding data
    Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A.
    Montesinos-Lopez, Abelardo
    Crossa, Jose
    de los Campos, Gustavo
    Alvarado, Gregorio
    Suchismita, Mondal
    Rutkoski, Jessica
    Gonzalez-Perez, Lorena
    Burgueno, Juan
    PLANT METHODS, 2017, 13
  • [46] Study of the classification efficiency of difficult-to-distinguish vegetation types using hyperspectral data
    Borzov, S. M.
    Guryanov, M. A.
    Potaturkin, O. I.
    COMPUTER OPTICS, 2019, 43 (03) : 464 - 473
  • [47] Method Analysis for Collecting and Processing in-situ Hyperspectral Needle Reflectance Data for Monitoring Norway Spruce
    Einzmann, Kathrin
    Ng, Wai-Tim
    Immitzer, Markus
    Bachmann, Martin
    Pinnel, Nicole
    Atzberger, Clement
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIE FERNERKUNDUNG GEOINFORMATION, 2014, (05): : 423 - 434
  • [48] Analysis of Vegetation Canopy Spectral Features and Species Discrimination in Reclamation Mining Area Using In Situ Hyperspectral Data
    Wang, Xu
    Xu, Hang
    Zhou, Jianwei
    Fang, Xiaonan
    Shuai, Shuang
    Yang, Xianhua
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [49] Differentiating aquatic plant communities in a eutrophic river using hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing
    Tian, Yong Q.
    Yu, Qian
    Zimmerman, Marc J.
    Flint, Suzanne
    Waldron, Marcus C.
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (08) : 1658 - 1673
  • [50] Plant functional trait data and reflectance spectra for 22 palmiet wetland species
    Rebelo, Alanna J.
    Somers, Ben
    Esler, Karen J.
    Meire, Patrick
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2018, 20 : 1209 - 1219