Using in situ hyperspectral reflectance data to distinguish nine aquatic plant species

被引:6
|
作者
Everitt, J. H. [1 ]
Yang, C. [1 ]
Summy, K. R. [2 ]
Owens, C. S. [3 ]
Glomski, L. M. [3 ]
Smart, R. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Weslaco, TX 78596 USA
[2] Univ Texas Pan Amer, Dept Biol, Edinburg, TX 78539 USA
[3] USA, Lewisville Aquat Ecosyst Res Facil, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Lewisville, TX 75057 USA
关键词
hyperspectral reflectance; spectral signature; multiple comparison range test; stepwise discriminant analysis; Eichhornia crassipes; Nelumbo lutea; Nuphar lutea; Nymphaea mexicana; Nymphaea odorata; Pistia stratiotes; Potamogeton nodusus; Salvinia molesta; Spirodela polyrrhiza;
D O I
10.1080/10106049.2011.591944
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In situ hyperspectral reflectance data were studied at 50 bands (10 nm bandwidth) over the 400-900 nm spectral range to determine their potential for distinguishing among nine aquatic plant species: American lotus [Nelumbo lutea (Willd.) Pers.], American pondweed (Potamogeton nodusus Poir.), giant duckweed [Spirodela polyrrhiza (L.) Schleid.], Mexican waterlily (Nymphaea mexicana Zucc.), white waterlily (Nymphaea odorata Aiton), spatterdock [Nuphar lutea (L.) Sm.], giant salvinia (Salvinia molesta Mitchell), waterhyacinth [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms] and waterlettuce (Pistia stratiotes L.). The species were studied on three dates: 30 May, 1 July and 3 August 2009. All nine species were studied in July and August, while only eight species were studied in May; giant duckweed was not studied in May due to insufficient availability. Two procedures were used to determine the optimum bands for discriminating among species: multiple comparison range tests and stepwise discriminant analysis. Multiple comparison range tests results for May showed that most separations among species occurred at bands 795-865 nm in the near-infrared (NIR) spectral region where up to six species could be distinguished. For July, few species could be distinguished among the 50 bands; most separations occurred at the 715 nm red-NIR edge band where four species could be differentiated. The optimum bands in August occurred in the green (525-595 nm), red (605-635 nm) and red-NIR edge (695-705 nm) spectral regions where up to six species could be distinguished. Stepwise discriminant analysis identified 11 bands in the blue, green, red-NIR edge and NIR spectral regions to be significant to discriminate among the eight species in May. For July and August, stepwise discriminant analysis identified 15 bands and 13 bands, respectively, from the blue to NIR regions to be significant for discriminating among the nine species.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 473
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Discrimination of Seagrass Species and Cover Classes with in situ Hyperspectral Data
    Pu, Ruiliang
    Bell, Susan
    Baggett, Lesley
    Meyer, Cynthia
    Zhao, Yongchao
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2012, 28 (06) : 1330 - 1344
  • [22] Conifer species recognition: An exploratory analysis of in situ hyperspectral data
    Gong, P
    Pu, RL
    Yu, B
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 62 (02) : 189 - 200
  • [23] Conifer species recognition: An exploratory analysis of in situ hyperspectral data
    Dept. of Environmental Science, Univ. of California, 15 Hilgard Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3110, United States
    Remote Sens. Environ., 2 (189-200):
  • [24] Tree species classification using plant functional traits from LiDAR and hyperspectral data
    Shi, Yifang
    Skidmore, Andrew K.
    Wang, Tiejun
    Holzwarth, Stefanie
    Heiden, Uta
    Pinnel, Nicole
    Zhu, Xi
    Heurich, Marco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2018, 73 : 207 - 219
  • [25] Phytoplankton Group Identification Using Simulated and In situ Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Reflectance
    Xi, Hongyan
    Hieronymi, Martin
    Krasemann, Hajo
    Roettgers, Ruediger
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2017, 4
  • [26] Light reflectance characteristics and film image relations among three aquatic plant species
    Everitt, JH
    Escobar, DE
    Webster, CF
    Lonard, RI
    TEXAS JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2000, 52 (02): : 153 - 158
  • [27] Extraction of the Red Edge Position from Hyperspectral Reflectance Data for Plant Stress Monitoring
    Velichkova, Kalinka
    Krezhova, Dora
    10TH JUBILEE CONFERENCE OF THE BALKAN PHYSICAL UNION, 2019, 2075
  • [28] Using hyperspectral reflectance data to assess biocontrol damage of giant salvinia
    Everitt, James H.
    Yang, Chenghai
    Summy, Kenneth
    Nachtrieb, Julie G.
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 28 (06) : 502 - 516
  • [29] Using Neural Networks to Identify Mixture Components in Hyperspectral Reflectance Data
    Zastrow, Allison M.
    Flynn, Eric
    STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND DATA MINING, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [30] Monitoring plant response to phenanthrene using the red edge of canopy hyperspectral reflectance
    Zhu, Linhai
    Chen, Zhongxin
    Wang, Jianjian
    Ding, Jinzhi
    Yu, Yunjiang
    Li, Junsheng
    Xiao, Nengwen
    Jiang, Lianhe
    Zheng, Yuanrun
    Rimmington, Glyn M.
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2014, 86 (1-2) : 332 - 341