Using in situ hyperspectral reflectance data to distinguish nine aquatic plant species

被引:6
|
作者
Everitt, J. H. [1 ]
Yang, C. [1 ]
Summy, K. R. [2 ]
Owens, C. S. [3 ]
Glomski, L. M. [3 ]
Smart, R. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Weslaco, TX 78596 USA
[2] Univ Texas Pan Amer, Dept Biol, Edinburg, TX 78539 USA
[3] USA, Lewisville Aquat Ecosyst Res Facil, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Lewisville, TX 75057 USA
关键词
hyperspectral reflectance; spectral signature; multiple comparison range test; stepwise discriminant analysis; Eichhornia crassipes; Nelumbo lutea; Nuphar lutea; Nymphaea mexicana; Nymphaea odorata; Pistia stratiotes; Potamogeton nodusus; Salvinia molesta; Spirodela polyrrhiza;
D O I
10.1080/10106049.2011.591944
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In situ hyperspectral reflectance data were studied at 50 bands (10 nm bandwidth) over the 400-900 nm spectral range to determine their potential for distinguishing among nine aquatic plant species: American lotus [Nelumbo lutea (Willd.) Pers.], American pondweed (Potamogeton nodusus Poir.), giant duckweed [Spirodela polyrrhiza (L.) Schleid.], Mexican waterlily (Nymphaea mexicana Zucc.), white waterlily (Nymphaea odorata Aiton), spatterdock [Nuphar lutea (L.) Sm.], giant salvinia (Salvinia molesta Mitchell), waterhyacinth [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms] and waterlettuce (Pistia stratiotes L.). The species were studied on three dates: 30 May, 1 July and 3 August 2009. All nine species were studied in July and August, while only eight species were studied in May; giant duckweed was not studied in May due to insufficient availability. Two procedures were used to determine the optimum bands for discriminating among species: multiple comparison range tests and stepwise discriminant analysis. Multiple comparison range tests results for May showed that most separations among species occurred at bands 795-865 nm in the near-infrared (NIR) spectral region where up to six species could be distinguished. For July, few species could be distinguished among the 50 bands; most separations occurred at the 715 nm red-NIR edge band where four species could be differentiated. The optimum bands in August occurred in the green (525-595 nm), red (605-635 nm) and red-NIR edge (695-705 nm) spectral regions where up to six species could be distinguished. Stepwise discriminant analysis identified 11 bands in the blue, green, red-NIR edge and NIR spectral regions to be significant to discriminate among the eight species in May. For July and August, stepwise discriminant analysis identified 15 bands and 13 bands, respectively, from the blue to NIR regions to be significant for discriminating among the nine species.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 473
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Plant Species Discrimination in a Tropical Wetland Using In Situ Hyperspectral Data
    Prospere, Kurt
    McLaren, Kurt
    Wilson, Byron
    REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 6 (09) : 8494 - 8523
  • [2] Recognition of eucalyptus forest species using hyperspectral reflectance data
    Datt, B
    IGARSS 2000: IEEE 2000 INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOL I - VI, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 1405 - 1407
  • [3] Using vegetation reflectance variability for species level classification of hyperspectral data
    Cochrane, MA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2000, 21 (10) : 2075 - 2087
  • [4] Evaluation of hyperspectral reflectance data for discriminating six aquatic weeds
    Everitt, James H.
    Yang, Chenghai
    Summy, Kenneth R.
    Glomski, Leeann M.
    Owens, Chetta S.
    JOURNAL OF AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 49 : 94 - U119
  • [5] Comparison of the Different Classifiers in Vegetation Species Discrimination Using Hyperspectral Reflectance Data
    Dian, Yuanyong
    Fang, Shenghui
    Le, Yuan
    Xu, Yongrong
    Yao, Chonghuai
    JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 42 (01) : 61 - 72
  • [6] Comparison of the Different Classifiers in Vegetation Species Discrimination Using Hyperspectral Reflectance Data
    Yuanyong Dian
    Shenghui Fang
    Yuan Le
    Yongrong Xu
    Chonghuai Yao
    Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2014, 42 : 61 - 72
  • [7] Corn chlorophyll estimation with in situ collected hyperspectral reflectance data
    Wang, ZM
    Zhang, B
    Song, KS
    Li, F
    Duan, HT
    IGARSS 2005: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Vols 1-8, Proceedings, 2005, : 2984 - 2986
  • [8] Broadleaf species recognition with in situ hyperspectral data
    Department of Geography, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, United States
    Int. J. Remote Sens., 11 (2759-2779):
  • [9] Broadleaf species recognition with in situ hyperspectral data
    Pu, Ruiliang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 30 (11) : 2759 - 2779
  • [10] Describing prairie C4 plant species area coverage using hyperspectral reflectance
    Huemmrich, Karl Fred
    Campbell, Petya E.
    Voorhies, Sarah K.
    Landis, David R.
    Middleton, Elizabeth M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 39 (23) : 8615 - 8626