Involvement of expert judgement in dynamic model

被引:0
|
作者
Krikstolaitis, R. [1 ]
Lutynska, A. E. [1 ]
Peciulyte, S. [1 ]
Zutautaite, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vytautas Magnus Univ, Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In many areas models of different processes take into account various factors that are time-dependent and dependent on each other. Thus, it is advisable to construct a dynamic model in order to describe these dependences. In the dynamic model we use indicators. An indicator is a special index, which provides numerical values to important factors for the investigated sector. The values of indicators are obtained from statistical data. Also this dynamic model enables to forecast the dynamics of the indicators according to different new factors. Since the parameters of new factors are not exactly known (got from expert judgement), their influences on indicators are expressed as random variables with known probabilistic distributions. Indicators model based on historic data is adjusted by probabilistic model with the influence of new factors on indicators using a Bayesian method.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 397
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modelling competing risks and opportunistic maintenance with expert judgement
    Bedford, T.
    Alkali, B. M.
    SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK ANALYSIS: THEORY, METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 515 - 521
  • [42] Expert judgement in pharmacoeconomic studies - Guidance and future use
    Evans, C
    Crawford, B
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2000, 17 (06) : 545 - 553
  • [43] Expert judgement for a probabilistic accident consequence uncertainty analysis
    Goossens, LHJ
    Harper, FT
    Kraan, BCP
    Métivier, H
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2000, 90 (03) : 295 - 301
  • [44] The role of expert judgement in risk assessment of complex plant
    Dumitrescu, M
    Carcadea, E
    Preda, IA
    Lazar, RE
    FORESIGHT AND PRECAUTION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2000, : 1083 - 1085
  • [45] Direct costs of transfusion reactions - an expert judgement approach
    Janssen, M. P.
    van Tilborgh, A. J. W.
    de Vooght, K. M. K.
    Bokhorst, A. G.
    Wiersum-Osselton, J. C.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2018, 113 (02) : 143 - 151
  • [46] An investigation of dependence in expert judgement studies with multiple experts
    Wilson, Kevin J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2017, 33 (01) : 325 - 336
  • [47] Comparing expert judgement and numerical criteria for hydrograph evaluation
    Crochemore, Louise
    Perrin, Charles
    Andreassian, Vazken
    Ehret, Uwe
    Seibert, Simon P.
    Grimaldi, Salvatore
    Gupta, Hoshin
    Paturel, Jean-Emmanuel
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2015, 60 (03): : 402 - 423
  • [48] Expert judgement for assessment of management influences on risk control
    Hale, AR
    Goossens, LHJ
    Costa, MF
    Matos, L
    Smit, K
    FORESIGHT AND PRECAUTION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2000, : 1077 - 1082
  • [49] Expert judgement and accident consequence uncertainty analysis (COSYMA)
    Goossens, LHJ
    Kelly, GN
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2000, 90 (03) : 293 - 294
  • [50] Expert judgement in a risk assessment model for Salmonella spp. in pork: The performance of different weighting schemes
    Boone, Ides
    Van der Stede, Yves
    Bollaerts, Kaatje
    Messens, Winy
    Vose, David
    Daube, Georges
    Aerts, Marc
    Mintiens, Koen
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2009, 92 (03) : 224 - 234