Involvement of expert judgement in dynamic model

被引:0
|
作者
Krikstolaitis, R. [1 ]
Lutynska, A. E. [1 ]
Peciulyte, S. [1 ]
Zutautaite, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vytautas Magnus Univ, Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In many areas models of different processes take into account various factors that are time-dependent and dependent on each other. Thus, it is advisable to construct a dynamic model in order to describe these dependences. In the dynamic model we use indicators. An indicator is a special index, which provides numerical values to important factors for the investigated sector. The values of indicators are obtained from statistical data. Also this dynamic model enables to forecast the dynamics of the indicators according to different new factors. Since the parameters of new factors are not exactly known (got from expert judgement), their influences on indicators are expressed as random variables with known probabilistic distributions. Indicators model based on historic data is adjusted by probabilistic model with the influence of new factors on indicators using a Bayesian method.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 397
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Expert judgement and accident consequences uncertainty analysis
    Higson, D.
    Physicist, 2001, 38 (03):
  • [22] A configural model of expert judgement as a preliminary epidemiological study of injury problems: An application to drowning
    Morgan, Damian
    Ozanne-Smith, Joan
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (10):
  • [23] The role of expert judgement in the assurance of structural reliability
    Slominski, RJ
    Green, VR
    Lidbury, DPG
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ASSURING IT'S SAFE: INTEGRATING STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY, INSPECTION, AND MONITORING INTO SAFETY AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 1998, 1998 (06): : 333 - 344
  • [24] Modelling Burglary Susceptibility - An Expert Judgement Approach
    Azmy, S. N.
    Rahman, M. Z. A.
    Amerudin, S.
    Zainon, O.
    10TH IGRSM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION ON GEOSPATIAL & REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 540
  • [25] Software quality evaluation based on expert judgement
    Rosqvist, T
    Koskela, M
    Harju, H
    SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2003, 11 (01) : 39 - 55
  • [26] Expert judgement and uncertainty quantification for climate change
    Oppenheimer, Michael
    Little, Christopher M.
    Cooke, Roger M.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, 6 (05) : 445 - 451
  • [27] Expert Judgement in Pharmacoeconomic StudiesGuidance and Future Use
    Christopher Evans
    Bruce Crawford
    PharmacoEconomics, 2000, 17 : 545 - 553
  • [28] Software Quality Evaluation Based on Expert Judgement
    Tony Rosqvist
    Mika Koskela
    Hannu Harju
    Software Quality Journal, 2003, 11 : 39 - 55
  • [29] Expert judgement combination using moment methods
    Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
    不详
    Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2008, 5 (675-686):
  • [30] Bias, guess and expert judgement in actuarial work
    Tredger, E. R. W.
    Lo, J. T. H.
    Haria, S.
    Lau, H. H. K.
    Bonello, N.
    Hlavka, B.
    Scullion, C.
    BRITISH ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2016, 21 (03) : 545 - 578