Landscape ecological assessment of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

被引:16
|
作者
Weber, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Maryland Dept Nat Resources, Landscape & Watershed Anal Div, Annapolis, MD 21401 USA
关键词
conservation; ecoregions; Chesapeake Bay; corridors; landscape assessment; geographic information systems;
D O I
10.1023/B:EMAS.0000016878.15260.52
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Chesapeake Bay Watershed, located in the Mid-Atlantic Region of the United States, is experiencing rapid habitat loss and fragmentation from sprawling low-density development. The bay itself is heavily stressed by excess sediment and nutrient runoff. Three states, the District of Columbia, and the federal government signed an agreement in 2000 to address these problems. The commitments included an assessment of the watershed's resource lands, and targeting the most valued lands for protection. As part of this task, the Resource Lands Assessment identified an ecological network comprised of large contiguous blocks (hubs) of forests, wetlands, and streams, interconnected by corridors to allow animal and plant propagule dispersal and migration. Hubs were prioritized by ecoregion, by analyzing a variety of ecological parameters, including: rare species presence, rarity and population viability; vegetation and vertebrate richness; habitat area, condition, and diversity; intactness and remoteness; connectivity potential; and the nature of the surrounding landscape. I found that much of the watershed was still fairly intact, although this varied dramatically by ecoregion. Current protection also varied, and an assessment of vulnerability will help focus protection efforts among the most valuable hubs and corridors.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 53
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ecological Forecasting and the Science of Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay
    Testa, Jeremy M.
    Clark, J. Blake
    Dennison, William C.
    Donovan, E. Caroline
    Fisher, Alexander W.
    Ni, Wenfei
    Parker, Matthew
    Scavia, Donald
    Spitzer, Suzanne E.
    Waldrop, Anthony M.
    Vargas, Vanessa M. D.
    Ziegler, Gregory
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2017, 67 (07) : 614 - 626
  • [32] Multiple Stressor Effects on Benthic Biodiversity of Chesapeake Bay: Implications for Ecological Risk Assessment
    Benjamin L. Preston
    Jeremiah Shackelford
    [J]. Ecotoxicology, 2002, 11 : 85 - 99
  • [33] Multiple stressor effects on benthic biodiversity of Chesapeake Bay: Implications for ecological risk assessment
    Preston, BL
    Shackelford, J
    [J]. ECOTOXICOLOGY, 2002, 11 (02) : 85 - 99
  • [34] The landscape ecological assessment and planning in the control watershed by reservoir of erlong mountain
    Shu-ying Zang
    Hui Yuan
    Jing Ning
    [J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2002, 12 : 176 - 181
  • [35] THE LANDSCAPE ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING IN THE CONTROL WATERSHED BY RESERVOIR OF ERLONG MOUNTAIN
    Zang Shu-ying
    Yuan Hui
    Ning Jing
    [J]. CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 12 (02) : 176 - 181
  • [36] Performance and economics of BNR plants in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USA
    Randall, CW
    Cokgor, EU
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 41 (09) : 21 - 28
  • [37] Atmospheric deposition to the Chesapeake Bay watershed - Regional and local sources
    Mason, RP
    Lawson, NM
    Sullivan, KA
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 31 (21) : 3531 - 3540
  • [38] Enhanced HSPF Model Structure for Chesapeake Bay Watershed Simulation
    Shenk, Gary W.
    Wu, Jing
    Linker, Lewis C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 138 (09) : 949 - 957
  • [39] Maryland, the Power Plant Research Program, and the Chesapeake Bay watershed
    Patty, SS
    Roth, N
    Mountain, D
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 240 (1-3) : 171 - 188
  • [40] Factors driving nutrient trends in streams of the Chesapeake Bay watershed
    Ator, Scott W.
    Blomquist, Joel D.
    Webber, James S.
    Chanat, Jeffrey G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2020, 49 (04) : 812 - 834