The honeycomb of engineering framework: Philosophy of engineering guiding precollege engineering education

被引:13
|
作者
Purzer, Senay [1 ]
Quintana-Cifuentes, Jenny [1 ]
Menekse, Muhsin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Coll Engn, Sch Engn Educ, 516 Northwestern Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
design-build-test; engineering analysis; engineering science; epistemology; honeycomb framework; K-12; optimization; precollege; reverse engineering; user-centered design; DESIGN; INQUIRY; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; EXPERT;
D O I
10.1002/jee.20441
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Understanding the nature of engineering is important for shaping engineering education, especially precollege education. While much research has established the pedagogical benefits of teaching engineering in kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12), the philosophical foundations of engineering remain under-examined. Purpose This conceptual paper introduces the honeycomb of engineering framework, which offers an epistemologically justified theoretical position and a pedagogical lens that can be used to examine ways engineering concepts and practices are taught in precollege education. Scope/Method The honeycomb of engineering was developed as a descriptive framework by examining existing literature over a wide range of related disciplines such as the philosophy of engineering and technology, as well as design thinking and practice. The pedagogical translation of the framework was then developed to examine published precollege engineering curricula. Results The framework categorizes the multiple goals of engineering using an ontological classification of engineering inquiries anchored in the central practice of negotiating risks and benefits (i.e., trade-offs). This framework also illustrates the adaptability of design methodology in guiding six inquiries: (1) user-centered design, (2) design-build-test, (3) engineering science, (4) optimization, (5) engineering analysis, and (6) reverse engineering. The published curricula represented these inquiries with varying degrees, with design-build-test lessons seeing the most representation followed by user-centered design. Conclusions The honeycomb of engineering framework delineates variations in engineering education based on an epistemological explanation. The pedagogical translations offer guidance to educators, researchers, and curriculum designers for differentiating curricular aims and learning outcomes resulting from participation in different engineering inquiries.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 39
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Engineering and Engineering Technology Education in Brazil
    Giorgetti, Marcius F.
    European Journal of Engineering Education, 1993, 18 (04) : 351 - 357
  • [42] Engineering design education and rehabilitation engineering
    Mann, RW
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 39 (06): : 23 - 37
  • [43] Problems in Engineering Education, Engineering and Invention
    Likholetov, Valeriy
    Aliukov, Sergei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2019, 35 (06) : 1605 - 1617
  • [44] Trends in Software Engineering for Engineering Education
    Angel Conde-Gonzalez, Miguel
    Sarasa-Cabezuelo, Antonio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2016, 32 (02) : 869 - 872
  • [45] Special Session - Continuing The FIE 2007 Conversation on: Can Philosophy of Engineering Education Improve The Practice of Engineering Education?
    Heywood, John
    McGrann, Roy
    Smith, Karl
    FIE: 2008 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 468 - +
  • [46] ENGINEERING-EDUCATION AND ENGINEERING PROFESSION
    WANDMACHER, C
    AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 1975, 56 (02): : 17 - 19
  • [47] Training of Engineering Spirit in Engineering Education
    Zhao, Meng
    Cui, Di
    Wang, Guicheng
    EDUCATION AND EDUCATION MANAGEMENT, 2013, 28 : 37 - 40
  • [48] FUTURE OF ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING-EDUCATION
    KEIL, AH
    ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 1973, 63 (05): : 335 - 337
  • [49] Science to Engineering Approach in Engineering Education
    Rao, J. S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION FOR THE PROMOTION OF MECHANISM AND MACHINE SCIENCE WORLD CONGRESS, 2015, : 440 - 446
  • [50] Trends in software engineering for engineering education
    1600, Tempus Publications (32):